AutoBanter

AutoBanter (http://www.autobanter.com/index.php)
-   4x4 (http://www.autobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Overfilled Oil (http://www.autobanter.com/showthread.php?t=6851)

shiden_kai December 20th 04 04:55 AM

Lawrence Glickman wrote:

> Suck my dick Ian.
> I didn't bring this *leaker* into this thread.
> Go **** yourself with a broomstick.
> I knew there was a reason I had you killfiled.
>
> PLONK


Oooooohh....noooooo....you "plonked" me!!!
I guess I've been told. Good luck on Monday,
I hope they run you out of the shop on a rail.
A little bit of tar and feathers wouldn't hurt either.

Ian



shiden_kai December 20th 04 04:57 AM

Whitelightning wrote:

> Or pre fill the oil filter before putting it on.


Right....I'd like to see you pre-fill the oil
filter on an Ecotec 4 cylinder engine. And
many other engines....good luck!

Ian



\Doc\ December 20th 04 05:56 AM


"shiden_kai" > wrote in message
news:EYsxd.545693$nl.113849@pd7tw3no...
> Whitelightning wrote:
>
>> Or pre fill the oil filter before putting it on.

>
> Right....I'd like to see you pre-fill the oil
> filter on an Ecotec 4 cylinder engine. And
> many other engines....good luck!
>
> Ian


Bingo.

The majority of 4-bangers I've worked on have the filter mounted parallel to
the ground, making it just a wee bit difficult <read:impossible> to pre-oil
the filter before install.

Doc


>
>




aarcuda69062 December 20th 04 12:50 PM

In article >,
Lawrence Glickman > wrote:

> Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
> Name ONE.


As of yesterday (12-19), the "Help diagnose starting problem"
thread.

No starter motor action and there you were, blathering about
Throttle Position Sensors, vacuum leaks, MAF sensors, fuel
pressure under load and your tinker toy scan tool.

That's five technical errors in ONE post!

Any other questions?

Lawrence Glickman December 20th 04 05:55 PM

On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:50:25 GMT, aarcuda69062
> wrote:

>In article >,
> Lawrence Glickman > wrote:
>
>> Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>> Name ONE.

>
>As of yesterday (12-19), the "Help diagnose starting problem"
>thread.
>
>No starter motor action and there you were, blathering about
>Throttle Position Sensors, vacuum leaks, MAF sensors, fuel
>pressure under load and your tinker toy scan tool.
>
>That's five technical errors in ONE post!
>
>Any other questions?


Yes just one.
WHY DO YOU EXIST?

You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
except negative criticism.

If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
minute.

The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.

I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.

PLONK

Lg


zonie December 21st 04 12:43 AM

Has anybody checked the oil yet to see if coolant getting in there, Im
wooried because he said the oil was light brown. Scott


WhyAsk December 21st 04 01:01 AM



Lawrence Glickman wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:22:27 -0600, "Bob" > wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Lawrence Glickman" > wrote in message
. ..
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:43:33 GMT, "shiden_kai"
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ken Weitzel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Is the gasket on the filter meant to be re-used ?
>>>>>
>>>>>And even if so, starting with an empty filter means another
>>>>>few seconds of engine running time before oil pressure,
>>>>>while the filter fills, right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>This is now an official "Lawrence Glickman" ****ed up
>>>>thread.
>>>>
>>>>Ian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Suck my dick Ian.
>>>I didn't bring this *leaker* into this thread.
>>>Go **** yourself with a broomstick.
>>>I knew there was a reason I had you killfiled.
>>>
>>>PLONK
>>>
>>>Lg
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>Glickman, you've just got to be one of the dumbest assholes on UseNet. If
>>you actually had Ian killfiled you wouldn't have even seen the post that you
>>just replied to. I'd have killfiled you long ago except that you're posts
>>have some entertainment value.
>>
>>

>
>Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>Name ONE.
>
>
>
>>Just when I think you couldn't possibly say
>>anything dumber you prove me wrong.
>>
>>

>
>Well bobbie, you live in a world of stupidity, so it doesn't surprise
>me that everything you see looks stupid to you.
>
>Now Name a SINGLE technical eror I've made, and the entire Usenet is
>WAITING.......................................... ...........................................
>
>

Don't now how to use spell check?

>Lg
>
>
>
>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>

>
>
>



Lawrence Glickman December 21st 04 01:47 AM

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:01:51 GMT, WhyAsk > wrote:

>
>
>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:22:27 -0600, "Bob" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Lawrence Glickman" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:43:33 GMT, "shiden_kai"
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ken Weitzel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Is the gasket on the filter meant to be re-used ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And even if so, starting with an empty filter means another
>>>>>>few seconds of engine running time before oil pressure,
>>>>>>while the filter fills, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>This is now an official "Lawrence Glickman" ****ed up
>>>>>thread.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Suck my dick Ian.
>>>>I didn't bring this *leaker* into this thread.
>>>>Go **** yourself with a broomstick.
>>>>I knew there was a reason I had you killfiled.
>>>>
>>>>PLONK
>>>>
>>>>Lg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Glickman, you've just got to be one of the dumbest assholes on UseNet. If
>>>you actually had Ian killfiled you wouldn't have even seen the post that you
>>>just replied to. I'd have killfiled you long ago except that you're posts
>>>have some entertainment value.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>>Name ONE.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Just when I think you couldn't possibly say
>>>anything dumber you prove me wrong.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Well bobbie, you live in a world of stupidity, so it doesn't surprise
>>me that everything you see looks stupid to you.
>>
>>Now Name a SINGLE technical eror I've made, and the entire Usenet is
>>WAITING......................................... ............................................
>>
>>

>Don't now how to use spell check?
>
>>Lg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bob


This is always the Last Resort of the Troll.
If you can win an argument with logic, go after typographical errors.
Now even you have to admit, that is about a Lame as it gets.
You can do better if you try.

Lg


aarcuda69062 December 21st 04 02:35 AM

In article >,
Lawrence Glickman > wrote:

> >Any other questions?

>
> Yes just one.
> WHY DO YOU EXIST?


Because nothing has been able to kill me yet.
(not for a lack of opportunity though)

> You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
> except negative criticism.


Key words being "to my [your] knowledge."

> If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
> starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
> minute.


Really? What happened to your thoughts of connecting your scan
tool as posted previously?
Seriously, how the hell can you misinterpret a statement like;
>>> When they turn the starter switch, nothing
>>> happens. You can't even hear the solenoid clicking or the
>>> starter trying to engage. No sound at all.




> The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
> out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.


What "he" said is directly above, it has >>> in front of it. Put
your finger underneath each word and sound them out if you have
to, take notes and reference them as often as you need.

> I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
> worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.


Gee Lawrence, you -did- ask the question, I merely provided
examples that satisfied your query.

> PLONK


Fine by me...

Whitelightning December 21st 04 02:45 AM


""Doc"" > wrote in message
...
>
> "shiden_kai" > wrote in message
> news:EYsxd.545693$nl.113849@pd7tw3no...
> > Whitelightning wrote:
> >
> >> Or pre fill the oil filter before putting it on.

> >
> > Right....I'd like to see you pre-fill the oil
> > filter on an Ecotec 4 cylinder engine. And
> > many other engines....good luck!
> >
> > Ian

>
> Bingo.
>
> The majority of 4-bangers I've worked on have the filter mounted parallel

to
> the ground, making it just a wee bit difficult <read:impossible> to

pre-oil
> the filter before install.
>
> Doc
>


You might not be able to completely fill it on all cars, but even if you can
get 1/4 qt in a 1/2 qt filter you have lessened the amount of time with no
oil pressure. I remember a few cars were your hands were completely tied
over the years, like the Chrysler slant six with the filter mounted upside
down, or more than a few toyotas were the filter was mounted angled down, or
any engine that used a cartridge instead of a spin on filter.
Whitelightning




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
AutoBanter.com