If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Annular Boosters versus Downleg Boostered Carbs
There was an interesting writeup in CarCraft mag. this month on an LS1
motor using a 750 cfm downleg Carb compared to a 750 cfm annular Carb ; the Dyno reported an unbelievable increase of 94 ft.lbs torque (at 1800 rpms) using the Annular over the Downleg. H.P. was up also especially at lower rpms. Is anyone running Annulars ? Whats your experience with them ? Dave |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I read that, it's for people that are trying to get an engine with giant
cams to have a better idle quality and get some torque down low. dave wrote: >There was an interesting writeup in CarCraft mag. this month on an LS1 >motor using a 750 cfm downleg Carb compared to a 750 cfm annular Carb ; >the Dyno reported an unbelievable increase of 94 ft.lbs torque (at 1800 >rpms) using the Annular over the Downleg. > H.P. was up also especially at lower rpms. > >Is anyone running Annulars ? Whats your experience with them ? > >Dave > > > -- Ric Seyler |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
'I read that, it's for people that are trying to get an engine with
giant cams to have a better idle quality and get some torque down low.' Reply: That is one of the applications for Annulars that work out well. But, just in general, they offer a healthy torque/hp increase between 1800-4000 rpms as the dyno chart showed in the article , versus a downleg carb using the same engine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|