If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Joe Pfeiffer wrote: > " > writes: > > > I think you misunderstood me. The fellow who was supposedly in charge > > of an operation that used $30,000 air filters a week was going by what > > he heard from ads or even engineers at the K&N company itself? That > > sounded patently absurd or tremendously incompetent. Come on, if he > > Reread the report. Based on hearsay, he felt it was worth testing the > K&N. They conducted a test; K&N flunked. The only decision they made > based on the ads was to conduct a study and see if it was true; for > the kind of money he's talking about, that's the only responsible > thing to do. Au contraire, it was not responsible, highly irresponsible for a director of operations to base a large test on hearsay. Could he not take one truck and one car for one week or two weeks at first? I used to work in the desert with large machinery, a mining operation. There's a body of experience and previous literature on dust, dirt, and big earth movers. This brings back a memory at the end of the day they'd spray down the machines with a fine mist. It was not plain water but a type of oil? Kerosene? In any case, it's good he did a test. I was just playing skeptic that the story was true in the first place. Maybe part of it. Maybe he did just do the company car and one truck and being from maybe Texas, the story gets, uh, embellished... |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
" > writes:
> > In any case, it's good he did a test. I was just playing skeptic that > the story was true in the first place. Maybe part of it. Maybe he did > just do the company car and one truck and being from maybe Texas, the > story gets, uh, embellished... Yeah, there is room to doubt the story really happened. I'd want a larger sample set than just one vehicle, though. -- Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605 Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002 New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer skype: jjpfeifferjr |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I know! The documented HP improvements on all cars, boats, planes,
and bicycles -- thanks to the Tornado -- is pure fact, not myth. It should have been disproven on a show called Factbusters. ======= Are you saying you believe that ridiculous hype? I can't tell what you;re trying to say. Ridiculous it is that anyone thinks that that turbulence or tornado spin is going to hold after passing over the throttle plate. Even if it did it woudn't result in anyting because most direct injection cars and EVEN carburated for that matter get much of their mixture from the cyl intake draw not pre-intake. What it ends up doing is DECREASING HP because it blocks a part of the intake. MB |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On the www.bobistheoilguy.com website, there are many comments about K&N
filters resulting in higher silica values in the engine oil of the vehicles they are installed in--consistently. There are also some other air filter tests (and explanation of the SAE test "dirt particles") too. Before K&N really rose to fame, they were more of a specialized air filter company of sorts, as their filters cost a good bit more than normal paper filters and not just everybody sold them. Then came the Mount St. Helen's situation and the volcanic ash was clogging every air filter that was not a K&N filter element. This got to be one of their earlier marketing subjects, with appropriate endorsements from emergency vehicle users who had to have vehicles in service all the time. In the earlier times, it was said that the K&N element would not only filter the air, but "straighten" it as it went through the filter and into the carburetor throttle bores. Decreased turbulence and a smoother air flow should result in more consistent metering and performance from the engine--in a modern vehicle, this might not be the great attribute it once was. As for the factory oiling of K&N filters . . . it might be that they are putting more red oil in them than they used to. If there's too much you can always get the "recharge" kit and wash and clean and reoil the element. One curious thing about K&Ns is that their flow capacity does not drop off with "dirt" in the element. In some tests, they actually flowed better when "dirty" than when new--as I recall that report. In a later 1970s car magazine air filter test, done by David Vizard (in his earlier days). The test filter housing was the open element Corvette air filter (i.e., same as 302 Z-28), which has been copied by the aftermarket (but not the deeply recessed base plate that allows for the lower hood clearance issues of the Corvette over the Holley carb it was mounted to--the factory filter sits 1" lower than the more common aftermarket look-alikes). The K&N flowed the highest, followed a little ways back by a Motorcraft filter for that application. "Poor man's K&N"??? The AC-Delco filter (which also came with a light oil sprayed on it), was mid-pack. I think there are some industrial filter "cleaners" that recycle air filter elements by reverse flow cleaning them somehow. I don't know how they do what they do or how much it extends service life, just that I think I've heard of some fleets using those services. Enjoy! C-BODY |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'm not using a K&N air filter ever again... | [email protected] | Technology | 53 | September 19th 05 05:13 AM |
warman i am surprised you mix oil | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 5 | May 8th 05 04:04 AM |
REAL air filter testing. More proof that K&N is junk. | Steve W. | Dodge | 48 | January 12th 05 01:22 PM |
REAL air filter testing. More proof that K&N is junk. | Steve W. | 4x4 | 25 | January 12th 05 01:22 PM |