|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 25th 05, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Cop threatens arrest over "F--- Bush" bumper sticker
Isn't it the conservatives who create the laws making it legal to only ****
bush anyway? 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
January 26th 05, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
> Alternately, what if I made a sticker that said 'Have Sex with Bush!'? > Would that be acceptable? It'd be more subtle to put the equivalent "do unto others as they do unto you".
|
|
#3
January 27th 05, 04:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's what bush thinks of you... (and the rest of us for that matter)
http://66.98.158.49/26mtvs/bushflipoff.wmv
|
|
#4
January 30th 05, 05:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > > "Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message > ... >> On 25 Jan 2005 18:49:03 -0800, >> >> >> >> The use of the word "****" is not obscene. >> > > Perhaps vulgar would be a better description. > Or liberal, perhaps progressive,,
|
|
#5
January 30th 05, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message ... > > "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On 25 Jan 2005 18:49:03 -0800, >>> >>> >>> >>> The use of the word "****" is not obscene. >>> >> >> Perhaps vulgar would be a better description. >> > Or liberal, perhaps progressive,, > I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly liberal leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is liberal/progressive or conservative.
|
|
#6
January 31st 05, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > > "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message > ... >> >> "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> "Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On 25 Jan 2005 18:49:03 -0800, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The use of the word "****" is not obscene. >>>> >>> >>> Perhaps vulgar would be a better description. >>> >> Or liberal, perhaps progressive,, >> > > I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly liberal > leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is > liberal/progressive or conservative. > It's a word, whoopy ****.
|
|
#7
January 31st 05, 02:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly > liberal leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is > liberal/progressive or conservative. Oh come on, It's just a friggin word.
|
|
#8
January 31st 05, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:19:00 -0800, "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov>
wrote: > >"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... >> >> "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> >>>> "Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> On 25 Jan 2005 18:49:03 -0800, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The use of the word "****" is not obscene. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Perhaps vulgar would be a better description. >>>> >>> Or liberal, perhaps progressive,, >>> >> >> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly liberal >> leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is >> liberal/progressive or conservative. >> > >It's a word, whoopy ****. > No ****. That's why people are outraged that a cop would threaten someone with arrest simply because he didn't like what they said.
|
|
#9
February 1st 05, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Olaf Gustafson" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:19:00 -0800, "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> > wrote: > >> >>"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> "Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message >>> ... >>>> >>>> "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> "Mike Z. Helm" > wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>>> On 25 Jan 2005 18:49:03 -0800, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The use of the word "****" is not obscene. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps vulgar would be a better description. >>>>> >>>> Or liberal, perhaps progressive,, >>>> >>> >>> I don't know. Cheney has used the word a few times...he's hardly >>> liberal >>> leaning. It remains vulgar regardless if the source is >>> liberal/progressive or conservative. >>> >> >>It's a word, whoopy ****. >> > > No ****. That's why people are outraged that a cop would threaten > someone with arrest simply because he didn't like what they said. A badge heavy dick head cop, how totally unbelievable NOT.
|
|
#10
February 1st 05, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim E" <FatboyPlonker@ FU.gov> wrote in message ... > > It's a word, whoopy ****. > Words have specific meanings and generate specific emotions...that is part of how they work in communication. If they were benign (no meaning) communication could not happen. As it turns out, use of certain words in communications can also generate a "picture" (or perception...real or not) of the type or class of individual using the "language". I would virtually guarantee that using words such as these on a resume probably won't get one a job as a CEO.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chevy Blazer Rear Bumper Removal | Spiderman | 4x4 | 1 | October 29th 04 12:28 PM |
| Are japs controlling the Blue Ribbon Coalition? | Sportsmen Against Bush | 4x4 | 6 | December 20th 03 03:58 AM |
Linear Mode
