If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Your opinion please
maurice wrote: > my hands on a particular '95 740i, > well it's about that time! > A couple questions though... the car has been maintained by the book, the > owner kept all the receipts, kept it in the garage etc., and only 91k km's, > I want to know if you think it wise to flush the engine, tranny, and switch > to synth motor and trans oils and if so which have you felt happy using (I'm > in Ontario, Canada). I don't believe in flushing trannies, unless the owner's man. specifically calls for it, or if there is an obvious need for some reason. Flush the engine? If the car has been maintained "by the book" as the owner claims, there is no need for any such nonsense. If the car has been using high quality conventional motor oil, it may well be best to stick with that, esp. if you drive the car on a regular basis without long periods of non-use (synthetics better for cold starts). >Lastly the car is really nice > condition, do you feel that $17,500.00 is a fair asking price? I just did a little checking for ya. As of yesterday, $17500 CAD equals $14406 US. Going to Edmunds.com I entered info for a '95 740i in Outstanding condition with 91k km (56,600 mi) and for color, I entered white (most common car color I think). I also used my own zip code (makes little dif- ference I'd guess). Here's what I got (converted all amounts to Can. dollars Trade-in: $9,873 CAD Private Party: $11,313 CAD (your case) Dealer Retail: $13,795 CAD Sounds like he's probably asking about $6,000 too much. -- Cliff |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
> Hi group!
> I want to mention off the top that I have been reading the posts here > since > last November and have learned much from you all, this is a great source > for > information. > I've been collecting info and perusing web-sites (Bavauto is great!) and > patiently waiting for my chance to get my hands on a particular '95 740i, > well it's about that time! > A couple questions though... the car has been maintained by the book, the > owner kept all the receipts, kept it in the garage etc., and only 91k > km's, > I want to know if you think it wise to flush the engine, tranny, and > switch > to synth motor and trans oils and if so which have you felt happy using > (I'm > in Ontario, Canada). I haven't seen yet many postings about clubs or > "meets" in this neck of the woods or northern New York - any suggestions. > Do you have any other tips about giving the car a fresh start - any fluid > lines or particular quirks I should look at? Lastly the car is really > nice > condition, do you feel that $17,500.00 is a fair asking price? ---------------------------------------------------- Was the '95 involved in the nikasil (sp?) engine issue? Believe it was, but not sure. Would not want to have to rebuild the engine, especially after having spent at least $5k more than the car was worth in the first place. DS |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"DFS" > wrote in message news:MME3e.4244$Jn2.3478@trnddc09... >> Hi group! >> I want to mention off the top that I have been reading the posts here >> since >> last November and have learned much from you all, this is a great source >> for >> information. >> I've been collecting info and perusing web-sites (Bavauto is great!) and >> patiently waiting for my chance to get my hands on a particular '95 740i, >> well it's about that time! >> A couple questions though... the car has been maintained by the book, the >> owner kept all the receipts, kept it in the garage etc., and only 91k >> km's, >> I want to know if you think it wise to flush the engine, tranny, and >> switch >> to synth motor and trans oils and if so which have you felt happy using >> (I'm >> in Ontario, Canada). I haven't seen yet many postings about clubs or >> "meets" in this neck of the woods or northern New York - any suggestions. >> Do you have any other tips about giving the car a fresh start - any fluid >> lines or particular quirks I should look at? Lastly the car is really >> nice >> condition, do you feel that $17,500.00 is a fair asking price? > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Was the '95 involved in the nikasil (sp?) engine issue? Believe it was, > but not sure. > > Would not want to have to rebuild the engine, especially after having > spent at least $5k more than the car was worth in the first place. > > DS I'm sure the poster was quoting $CDN. In any case, this car likely has the Nikasil block. I would suggest running away from this car as fast as possible. Sadly.... BMW released the M60B30 and M60B40 V8's with the 93 model year 5,7 and 8 series. These engines ran until the 95 model year. From the 96 model year, they were replaced by the M62B44. The 3.0L was dropped in the US, but the rest of the world got the M62B35, a 3.5 litre V8. There are many rumours about the fate of the M60 engine, but only one is true. The engines have been known to suffer damage to the cylinder bores from the excessive amounts of sulphur in the US fuels. The blocks are made of Nikasil, which is Aluminum impregnated with Nickel and Silicone. Apparently , sulphur reacts adversely with the Nickel , causing very slight blemishes in the top few millimetres of the cylinder bore. The cylinder bores are crosshatched, which is the name given to a pattern scratched into the surface of the cylinder wall. These scratches help seat and seal the piston rings, allowing good compression. When the cylinder walls become damaged, the piston rings can no longer seal properly. As a result, the engine suffers from "leak down". This is the term given for the amount of air that can escape past the piston as it attempts to compress the air into the combustion chamber. A near new engine , in good condition, should have a leak down rating of approximately 5-8%. BMW's maximum allowable leak down , on any engine, is 15%. Anything beyond that requires repair to the engine. Leak down can also be caused by poorly seated valves. The problem in the V8's manifests itself as an EXCESSIVELY rough idle. These engines, due to their performance oriented cam shafts, have a noticeable "rock" at idle, this is completely normal. However, excessively rough idle will cause the entire car to shake, usually unevenly. The problem can also cause the engine to lose so much compression that it will no longer start. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Forgot to credit Koala Motorsport for the info. Here is the full article:
What's wrong with the V8 ? 09/19/04. The original "What's wrong with the V8" article was written in 1997. It's time for an update. The original, unedited, article is below. First, let me make it clear that any and all warranties on this engine are long over. The 6yr 100K mile warranty ran out some time around 2001. Don't expect BMW to come to your aid if you have a problem, it's not their fault that previous owners of your car didn't act on the chance to have the problem corrected. An important point in the Nikasil issue that has become quite clear over the last couple of years is that it's really not an issue any more. BMW, for the second time in history, succeeded in forcing a change in US fuel production. Some time around 1997/1998, the US fuel companies cleaned up their fuel, removing the large amounts of sulphur that had been commonplace before then. If you are considering the purchase of an M60 equipped vehicle, you should have it checked to see if it has a Nikasil or Alusil engine. If it has a Nikasil engine, you should have a leak down test performed. If that leakdown test shows results below 15% on all cylinders, you should not consider the engine to be a problem. If the engine has not failed, it probably will not fail due to the new fuels. We personally have seen Nikasil engines with 30+K miles on them with 4% or less leak down, because the engines were installed at or about the time that the fuel changes took place. Read the original article below, determine the engine, have the leak down test performed if necessary, and make your own decision. Original article. BMW released the M60B30 and M60B40 V8's with the 93 model year 5,7 and 8 series. These engines ran until the 95 model year. From the 96 model year, they were replaced by the M62B44. The 3.0L was dropped in the US, but the rest of the world got the M62B35, a 3.5 litre V8. There are many rumours about the fate of the M60 engine, but only one is true. The engines have been known to suffer damage to the cylinder bores from the excessive amounts of sulphur in the US fuels. The blocks are made of Nikasil, which is Aluminum impregnated with Nickel and Silicone. Apparently , sulphur reacts adversely with the Nickel , causing very slight blemishes in the top few millimetres of the cylinder bore. The cylinder bores are crosshatched, which is the name given to a pattern scratched into the surface of the cylinder wall. These scratches help seat and seal the piston rings, allowing good compression. When the cylinder walls become damaged, the piston rings can no longer seal properly. As a result, the engine suffers from "leak down". This is the term given for the amount of air that can escape past the piston as it attempts to compress the air into the combustion chamber. A near new engine , in good condition, should have a leak down rating of approximately 5-8%. BMW's maximum allowable leak down , on any engine, is 15%. Anything beyond that requires repair to the engine. Leak down can also be caused by poorly seated valves. The problem in the V8's manifests itself as an EXCESSIVELY rough idle. These engines, due to their performance oriented cam shafts, have a noticeable "rock" at idle, this is completely normal. However, excessively rough idle will cause the entire car to shake, usually unevenly. The problem can also cause the engine to lose so much compression that it will no longer start. While BMW was investigating the cause of the problem, several different methods of repair were tried. First, they decided to raise the operating temperature of the engine, in an attempt to get a better burn of the gas, and therefore lessen the damage. The benefits of this campaign , which included replacement of the engine EPROM and thermostat, were negligible, if existent. However, they were an attempt to fix a problem that was not yet fully understood. Once it was decided the engines needed to be opened and repairs made, the first try was installation of new pistons and rings, this was only tried on a few engines and was immediately dismissed as not viable. Next step was to replace the short block assembly. This is what is still being done now, however, until the problem was 100 percent diagnosed by BMW, the replacement short blocks were of the same material as the original engines. This was not so much an oversight, but the only possible way of keeping cars on the road until a permanent solution could be found. As a measure of good faith, BMW initiated an engine warranty, covering all internally lubricated parts, which includes the short block, for 100,000 miles, or 6 years. Until this, the engines were only covered under the standard 4 year 50,000 mile warranty. Now, as the short blocks were being replaced with the same exact part, future problems could be expected without a doubt. The result of this situation is that some cars have had 2 and even 3 short block replacements. As of early 1997, all replacement short blocks were of the new material, called Alusil. This material has been used in the V12 engines since their inception. No reason was given for the change to Nikasil, but I'd like to bet that guy no longer has a job. Anyway, Alusil does not suffer the same problem as Nikasil and if the Alusil short block has been installed, you no longer need to worry about the situation. How do you tell which material is in your short block ? That part is fairly easy. But it requires getting under the right front of the car. All M60 and M62 blocks have casting numbers on the right side, directly alongside the 3rd cylinder, slightly above the coolant drain bolt. These are the casting numbers to look for : Nikasil M60B30 1 725 970 or 1 741 212 Nikasil M60B40 1 725 963 or 1 742 998 Alusil M60B30 1 745 871 Alusil M60B40 1 745 872 Alusil M62B44 1 745 873 NOTE, all US market M62 engines are Alusil. This is the only way to determine which M60 you have, short of removing a cylinder head. In performing engine repairs or rebuild procedures in the future, it is imperative that you correctly identify the cylinder block, as the pistons and rings used in each style are different and not interchangeable. What do I do if my engine idles rough ? If you feel your M60 is idling roughly, make an appointment with your dealer for an idle quality check. This check is free, under the conditions of the 100,000 mile engine warranty. During this test, the technician hooks the car up to the BMW diagnostic computer system, which monitors the condition of the engine. If, during this test, the computer finds that there is a potential problem, it will order the technician to perform a manual leak down test. If the tech finds any ONE cylinder to have more than 15% leak down, you will be advised of the need for a new short block. You will then be requested to either leave the vehicle, or make an appointment to bring the vehicle back. The dealer will require the car for approximately 5 days, during which , they are to make a rental or loaner car available to you. If you have the test performed, but the results do not show the need for a new engine, do not go running to the next dealer for a new test. The dealer gets paid by BMW for his time, however, repetitive testing will not be covered, so the second dealer will not get paid for his time. This is unfair to the dealer. If your car passes, but you feel it should fail, take it in for another test in a few months, not straight away. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
maurice wrote:
> I remember reading about that some time ago but was not able to confirm... > anyone know how to verify this? > Is it possible that only affected European builds? In regard to Nikasil engines, this was definitely NOT a european only problem. In fact it may have applied more to the US cars as the fueld was suspected to be higher in sulpher at that time. I have a '94 540iA and it had the block replaced with an Alusil block under warranty by a PO. The only way to know for certain is to crawl under the beast and get a look at the part number that is embossed on the block. The good news is that the prices of these V8 cars is depressed somewhat due to this issue, so if you can find one that *has* had the short block replaced you can get a good deal. However, and this is such a serious issue I would not take anyone's word for it, including the dealership. Just eyeball the block p/n and if it's one of the good ones you are in fat city. As a point of reference, I bought mine 2 years ago (found it down in Virginia - no rust) with less than 100k miles on it for $8500. -Fred W |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"maurice" > wrote in message ... >I remember reading about that some time ago but was not able to confirm... > anyone know how to verify this? > Is it possible that only affected European builds? No. All the engines had the Nicasil liners so the problem was world wide. In fact, I believe that it was more apparent in NA because of the higher sulfphur content in the gas. > > Maurice > > "DFS" > wrote in message > news:MME3e.4244$Jn2.3478@trnddc09... >> > Hi group! >> > I want to mention off the top that I have been reading the posts here >> > since >> > last November and have learned much from you all, this is a great >> > source >> > for >> > information. >> > I've been collecting info and perusing web-sites (Bavauto is great!) >> > and >> > patiently waiting for my chance to get my hands on a particular '95 > 740i, >> > well it's about that time! >> > A couple questions though... the car has been maintained by the book, > the >> > owner kept all the receipts, kept it in the garage etc., and only 91k >> > km's, >> > I want to know if you think it wise to flush the engine, tranny, and >> > switch >> > to synth motor and trans oils and if so which have you felt happy using >> > (I'm >> > in Ontario, Canada). I haven't seen yet many postings about clubs or >> > "meets" in this neck of the woods or northern New York - any > suggestions. >> > Do you have any other tips about giving the car a fresh start - any > fluid >> > lines or particular quirks I should look at? Lastly the car is really >> > nice >> > condition, do you feel that $17,500.00 is a fair asking price? >> ---------------------------------------------------- >> >> Was the '95 involved in the nikasil (sp?) engine issue? Believe it was, > but >> not sure. >> >> Would not want to have to rebuild the engine, especially after having > spent >> at least $5k more than the car was worth in the first place. >> >> DS >> >> > > |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Where are you located?
If you are in the Toronto area I can recommend an excellent independent BMW specialist. He saved me a ton of money when I was shopping for my E39 540i. He also worked on my BMWs for over 15 years. Wherever you are located, if you buy an older BMW and you are not an expert mechanic then you should rely on a good independent BMW specialist because any older car will require work. Some cars have the normal work and then there are other cars that turn out to be nightmares. You have to get an expert to check any used BMW out before you buy one. Just getting opinions on this NG is just for starters. Final advice: if you have found a good car you should run the car for a month or two and see how well it runs. At that point IMO you should replace all the normal wear items that your mechanic has flagged as either marginal or replaceable at that mileage. No sense using the car with worn parts only to replace them a few years later and sell the car. The car will run much better with new parts. You want to get the use out of the replacement parts as early as possible while you still own the car not after you decide to sell the car later or when the car gets really old. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hello from Toronto.
What's in your garage? "Michael Low" > wrote in message oups.com... > Where are you located? > > If you are in the Toronto area I can recommend an excellent independent > BMW specialist. He saved me a ton of money when I was shopping for my > E39 540i. He also worked on my BMWs for over 15 years. > > Wherever you are located, if you buy an older BMW and you are not an > expert mechanic then you should rely on a good independent BMW > specialist because any older car will require work. Some cars have the > normal work and then there are other cars that turn out to be > nightmares. You have to get an expert to check any used BMW out before > you buy one. Just getting opinions on this NG is just for starters. > > Final advice: if you have found a good car you should run the car for a > month or two and see how well it runs. At that point IMO you should > replace all the normal wear items that your mechanic has flagged as > either marginal or replaceable at that mileage. No sense using the car > with worn parts only to replace them a few years later and sell the > car. The car will run much better with new parts. > > You want to get the use out of the replacement parts as early as > possible while you still own the car not after you decide to sell the > car later or when the car gets really old. > |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I can also recommend and EXCELLENT shop in Oakville. The owner is a former
BMW service manager. Since 1987, when any of my cars (especially the BMW's) are out of warranty he's done all the work. "maurice" > wrote in message ... > I'm just west of T.O. and have been given the name of a mechanic up HWY > 404 > and Davidson Drive who I might make the trek up to see, where's your guy > located? > > > "Michael Low" > wrote in message > oups.com... >> Where are you located? >> >> If you are in the Toronto area I can recommend an excellent independent >> BMW specialist. He saved me a ton of money when I was shopping for my >> E39 540i. He also worked on my BMWs for over 15 years. >> >> Wherever you are located, if you buy an older BMW and you are not an >> expert mechanic then you should rely on a good independent BMW >> specialist because any older car will require work. Some cars have the >> normal work and then there are other cars that turn out to be >> nightmares. You have to get an expert to check any used BMW out before >> you buy one. Just getting opinions on this NG is just for starters. >> >> Final advice: if you have found a good car you should run the car for a >> month or two and see how well it runs. At that point IMO you should >> replace all the normal wear items that your mechanic has flagged as >> either marginal or replaceable at that mileage. No sense using the car >> with worn parts only to replace them a few years later and sell the >> car. The car will run much better with new parts. >> >> You want to get the use out of the replacement parts as early as >> possible while you still own the car not after you decide to sell the >> car later or when the car gets really old. >> > > |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
He's just off the Don Valley Parkway near Bayview and Danforth.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Troy or Berk strut compressor opinion. | Mike | Technology | 0 | January 30th 05 11:47 PM |
HELP: Opinion Needed | Billy | Corvette | 0 | August 19th 04 08:34 PM |
HELP: Opinion needed... | Billy | Audi | 0 | August 19th 04 07:38 PM |
Santa Fe 2004 your opinion | Santa | 4x4 | 0 | April 29th 04 06:48 PM |