"Sobriety Checkpoints"

Hell, DUIs should be given rewards for dealing with moron LLB'rs like
yourself. By the way, you don't seem to be too interested in
prosecuting Tubby Kennedy, you hypocritical idiot.

Hell, DUIs should be given rewards for dealing with moron LLB'rs like
yourself. By the way, you don't seem to be too interested in
prosecuting Tubby Kennedy, you hypocritical idiot.

Hell, DUIs should be given rewards for dealing with moron LLB'rs like
yourself. By the way, you don't seem to be too interested in
prosecuting Tubby Kennedy, you hypocritical idiot.

Why don't you stop being a criminal coddler? Your hero Tubby Kennedy
murdered a gal while he was DUI, and yet you never make a peep over
that. Typical idiot hypocrite liberal.

Why don't you stop being a criminal coddler? Your hero Tubby Kennedy
murdered a gal while he was DUI, and yet you never make a peep over
that. Typical idiot hypocrite liberal.

(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article >, Jim Yanik
> wrote:
>
>> vehicle behaving erratically,saw an infraction,or noticed a vehicle
>> problem such as a dead or wrongly aimed headlight,or excessively
>> loud stereo.It would even be legit for them to wait down the road
>> from known bars and stop those observed to be driving erratically.
>
> That is where they fall back to under posted speed limits. Going the
> speed limit or less, 10+mph under the flow speed of traffic, must be a
> drunk. Go the speed of traffic, speeding. Simple as that.
>
>

Still better than violating everyone's right of free movement.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article >, Jim Yanik
> wrote:
>
>> vehicle behaving erratically,saw an infraction,or noticed a vehicle
>> problem such as a dead or wrongly aimed headlight,or excessively
>> loud stereo.It would even be legit for them to wait down the road
>> from known bars and stop those observed to be driving erratically.
>
> That is where they fall back to under posted speed limits. Going the
> speed limit or less, 10+mph under the flow speed of traffic, must be a
> drunk. Go the speed of traffic, speeding. Simple as that.
>
>

Still better than violating everyone's right of free movement.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article <pan.2005.01.07.01.55.12.626542@blutz>, Bob Lutz wrote:
>
>> How exactly does the state get away with stopping motorists at a
>> 'checkpoint'? Seems to me they have to have 'probable cause', and
>> I'm not sure the mere act of driving late at night constitutes that.
>
> This is one of those things where the spirit of the constitution +
> bill of rights is ignored and it becomes like a rule book for a game.
> Because driving isn't a right, but a privledge, they then in turn use
> that to deny any citizen in a motor vehicle the rights he should have
> regardless of his mode of transport.
>
> It's another aspect where the government and its police forces work
> around that pesky document known as The Bill of Rights.
>
>

It's called Judicial Activism.
Judges not going by the Constitution,but by how they feel,popular
opinion,or by what other countries do.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

(Brent P) wrote in
:

> In article <pan.2005.01.07.01.55.12.626542@blutz>, Bob Lutz wrote:
>
>> How exactly does the state get away with stopping motorists at a
>> 'checkpoint'? Seems to me they have to have 'probable cause', and
>> I'm not sure the mere act of driving late at night constitutes that.
>
> This is one of those things where the spirit of the constitution +
> bill of rights is ignored and it becomes like a rule book for a game.
> Because driving isn't a right, but a privledge, they then in turn use
> that to deny any citizen in a motor vehicle the rights he should have
> regardless of his mode of transport.
>
> It's another aspect where the government and its police forces work
> around that pesky document known as The Bill of Rights.
>
>

It's called Judicial Activism.
Judges not going by the Constitution,but by how they feel,popular
opinion,or by what other countries do.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net

wrote in
oups.com:

>
> Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
>> >James C. Reeves Jan 6, 7:57 pm
>>
>> >How does the level of penalty change the method/type of enforcement?
>>
>> Hey stupid. If DUIs knew they'd get prison time, they wouldn't drive
>> drunk and we wouldn't need checkpoints. And those few that still did
>> drive would find themselves in prison and no longer on the highways.
>> STOP BEING A CRIMINAL CODDLER.
>
> Yeah RIGHT. Because MURDER has been eliminated in this country because
> of stiff prison time, right? What an idiot!
>
>

Well,it will never be -eliminated-,but stiff prison terms HAS resulted in a
reduction in murder rates.Also other crime.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net