If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
Is it possible to pick up European Code tail lights for an 04 Town and
Country and install them in a North American vehicle with just some minor changes to the wires and bulb holders? I'm headed for Italy and would pick up a pair if this is possible. Remember, by 04 the North American version has just one bulb plus backup bulb. Thanks. Richard. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
The taillamp clusters themselves will fit. The single-bulb
tail/stop/turn setup in your 2004 means you will need to do some rewiring. It's not all that difficult to do if the 2004 wiring setup is the same one Chrysler's been using for years on their vehicles with single-bulb tail/stop/turn setups: You need to cut the wire that runs from the brake lamp switch to the turn signal switch. The existing brake lamp wires then become your turn signal wires, and you run a new wire from the brake lamp switch side of the cut wire to the rear of the vehicle, to power the brake lamps. Make it a nice 14ga wire and you can hook up both the factory brake and factory rear-fog lamps in the European-code taillamps to act as brake lamps (spend another couple minutes and add a diode or two and you can have a rear fog *and* quad brake lamps). While you're over there, why not get the good headlamps, too? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message oups.com... > The taillamp clusters themselves will fit. The single-bulb > tail/stop/turn setup in your 2004 means you will need to do some > rewiring. It's not all that difficult to do if the 2004 wiring setup is > the same one Chrysler's been using for years on their vehicles with > single-bulb tail/stop/turn setups: You need to cut the wire that runs > from the brake lamp switch to the turn signal switch. The existing > brake lamp wires then become your turn signal wires, and you run a new > wire from the brake lamp switch side of the cut wire to the rear of the > vehicle, to power the brake lamps. Make it a nice 14ga wire and you can > hook up both the factory brake and factory rear-fog lamps in the > European-code taillamps to act as brake lamps (spend another couple > minutes and add a diode or two and you can have a rear fog *and* quad > brake lamps). > > While you're over there, why not get the good headlamps, too? If I get these (if a dealer in Rome has them in stock, or if I find them at a local Roman junk yard, ha,) I will wire in one of the rear fog lights while I'm at it. Would all you nice newsgroup people please start up a fund to help me pay for all those nice parts? Richard. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
"Richard" > wrote in message ... > > "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message > oups.com... > > The taillamp clusters themselves will fit. The single-bulb > > tail/stop/turn setup in your 2004 means you will need to do some > > rewiring. It's not all that difficult to do if the 2004 wiring setup is > > the same one Chrysler's been using for years on their vehicles with > > single-bulb tail/stop/turn setups: You need to cut the wire that runs > > from the brake lamp switch to the turn signal switch. The existing > > brake lamp wires then become your turn signal wires, and you run a new > > wire from the brake lamp switch side of the cut wire to the rear of the > > vehicle, to power the brake lamps. Make it a nice 14ga wire and you can > > hook up both the factory brake and factory rear-fog lamps in the > > European-code taillamps to act as brake lamps (spend another couple > > minutes and add a diode or two and you can have a rear fog *and* quad > > brake lamps). > > > > While you're over there, why not get the good headlamps, too? > > If I get these (if a dealer in Rome has them in stock, or if I find them > at a local Roman junk yard, ha,) I will wire in one of the rear fog lights > while I'm at it. Would all you nice newsgroup people please start up a fund > to help me pay for all those nice parts? > Why not just sell it and buy one over there? Ted |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Why not just sell it and buy one over there? Perhaps it's because he's only *visiting* over there, I donno, on a vacation or somesuch, and wishes better lighting on his minivan when he returns home. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message oups.com... > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> Why not just sell it and buy one over there? > > Perhaps it's because he's only *visiting* over there, I donno, on a > vacation or somesuch, and wishes better lighting on his minivan when he > returns home. Exactly right. I just wish Mr. Stern was more successful at getting the government in Canada to mandate better lighting. Richard. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
"Richard" > wrote in message ... > > "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message > oups.com... >> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> >>> Why not just sell it and buy one over there? >> >> Perhaps it's because he's only *visiting* over there, I donno, on a >> vacation or somesuch, and wishes better lighting on his minivan when he >> returns home. > > Exactly right. I just wish Mr. Stern was more successful at getting the > government in Canada to mandate better lighting. > > Richard. > FMVSS should demand this: All lighting on a vehicle should be on at ALL times... when driving that is. I see far too many people in the rain, during the day, no lights on... (other than DRL). what's up with that?? I use my rear fogs in adverse conditions... that's why my bumper has no damage (Volvo) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
M.R.S. wrote: > "Richard" > wrote in message > ... > > > > "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message > > oups.com... > >> Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> > >>> Why not just sell it and buy one over there? > >> > >> Perhaps it's because he's only *visiting* over there, I donno, on a > >> vacation or somesuch, and wishes better lighting on his minivan when he > >> returns home. > > > > Exactly right. I just wish Mr. Stern was more successful at getting the > > government in Canada to mandate better lighting. > > > > Richard. > > > > FMVSS should demand this: > > All lighting on a vehicle should be on at ALL times... when driving that is. > > I see far too many people in the rain, during the day, no lights on... > (other than DRL). what's up with that?? > > I use my rear fogs in adverse conditions... that's why my bumper has no > damage (Volvo) These rear fogs sound like a great idea. Are they like tail lights only brighter? Are they required in all European Countries, or only Germany? -Kirk Matheson |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
Rear fogs are allowed in North America and several import vehicles have them
here. I understand that just one bright red rear segment pm the left rear is best but both sides lit is permitted here and many if not most imports with rear fogs sport that arrangement. Richard. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Tail light Conversion
Richard wrote:
> I just wish Mr. Stern was more successful at getting the > government in Canada to mandate better lighting. The government in Canada doesn't need convincing. They (or "he", more accurately, i.e. the Canadian regulator in charge of motor vehicle lighting and reflective devices) is fully aware that red rear turn signals are dumb. He knows there should be less glare from low beams and DRLs. He knows side turn signal repeaters should be on every car. He knows the value of a rear fog lamp. He knows there ought to be stringent standards for front fog lamps' performance, mounting and installation. The problem is with the Americans! Remember, the North American Auto Pact of 1965 effectively locked Canada into line with US vehicle regulations. What differences exist are generally minor, and it's kept that way by the US auto industry and the US DOT (specifically NHTSA). Canada was looking at accepting all ECE standards, as well as whole ECE vehicles. The idea passed all safety analyses (of course it would, for the road-safest nations in the world all require or permit ECE standards), but the automakers and US DOT hollered bloody murder about it. The automakers said "When we build a car for the German market, that's where we want it to stay. We don't want it showing up in Canada. If you do this, you'll be taking away our control over what vehicles enter the Canadian market, and that will undermine our marketing strategy." US DOT said "If you allow ECE, we'll be the only country in the world doing something different." So, the idea was quashed, because the US didn't want Canada to do it. But, when Canada last brought up the idea of mandating amber rear turn signals, the US auto industry threatened to take Canada to free-trade court over it. Because of the way the "free trade" agreements of the last four decades are written, Canada would lose. So, there you have it. Sign "free trade" agreements with one hand to eliminate tarrifs and monetary trade barriers, then write different-from-the-rest-of-the-world-but-not-better technical standards to hide trade barriers in with the right hand. There is no such a thing as "free trade", folks. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mopar Oil Filter Number(s) | do not spam | Chrysler | 3 | January 7th 06 01:18 PM |
The dangers of DRLs | 223rem | Driving | 399 | July 25th 05 11:28 PM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 5 | May 24th 05 05:27 AM |
tail light guard installation instructions | [email protected] | Jeep | 1 | February 12th 05 08:51 PM |
Chevy Blazer Broken/Stuck Bulb in Rear Right Tail Light | Spiderman | 4x4 | 10 | November 30th 04 01:03 AM |