If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tire question: buy pricier or more often?
I suppose this can apply to any product but in this case I am thinking
of tires: (1) I can buy a pricier model which will last a long time, but then I'd have an old tire most of that time. (2) I can buy a less expensive model but change it more frequently, so I'd have a newer tire most of the time. Which is the better way? Would you buy a new Lexus every 10-12 years , or a new Corolla/Camry every 4-5 years? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
It isn't quite that straightforward a tradeoff as price vs. treadwear.
Tires operate in a rather more complex parameter space than most consumer goods. The one thing I can say for sure is that buying really cheap tires is likely to be a poor bargain in the long run, unless your wear bars are on the pavement and money is so tight that you can't afford better. I've found that it's worthwhile to pay a bit extra for a better tire if you can. Just what that is, depends on your car and weather and driving style. Quite often a *lot* of tire parameters can be simultaneously improved by throwing money at the problem. Best of luck, --Joe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, RPS wrote:
> (1) I can buy a pricier model which will last a long time, but then I'd > have an old tire most of that time. > > (2) I can buy a less expensive model but change it more frequently, so > I'd have a newer tire most of the time. It's more complex than that. Tires that are extremely durable tend to have poorer road grip. Tires with better road grip tend to have shorter lifespans. > Would you buy a new Lexus every 10-12 years , or a new Corolla/Camry > every 4-5 years? Not a valid analogy. What do you drive, where, how, and in what conditions? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Price has little to do with quality - no matter what the product. I
always buy cheap. The four tires i have on my car right now combined cost $150 installed. That even includes the damn charge to GIVE them my old tires. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:22:59 +0000, RPS wrote:
> I suppose this can apply to any product but in this case I am thinking of > tires: > > (1) I can buy a pricier model which will last a long time, but then I'd > have an old tire most of that time. > > (2) I can buy a less expensive model but change it more frequently, so I'd > have a newer tire most of the time. > > Which is the better way? Depends on whether you value your life and the life of others. Take that LBMHBF guy. He howls and whines every day about others driving at a reasonable pace but claims to drive an old clunker with clapped out brakes and horrid cheap tires and thus, if this was true, would risk more people's lives than someone, who speeds within reason but drives a good car with good brakes and good tires. Of course he is just a little troll, who can't afford a car, but you get the idea. Btw, cheaper tires don't necessarily wear faster, but they usually grip much worse, and please don't insult our intelligence by claiming that you don't need good grip. I prefer better (more expensive) tires, which wear faster, but give me the edge in dangerous situations. And where this LBMHBF critter would plow into the other car with his imaginary shrieking cheapo tires and imaginary iron grinding on iron because of missing brake pads, I can comfortably stop and watch him get out of his imaginary wrecked clunker crying the blues about how he can't afford chewing tobacco for a month, because he has to replace his $150 wreck. Chris |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ad absurdum per aspera > wrote:
: It isn't quite that straightforward a tradeoff as price vs. treadwear. : Tires operate in a rather more complex parameter space than most : consumer goods. I realize there are different parameters but within a type and brand, I'd think a tire rated for 80,000 miles would cost more than one rated for 40,000 miles, is that not so? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
> I realize there are different parameters but within a type and brand,
> I'd think a tire rated for 80,000 miles would cost more than one rated > for 40,000 miles, is that not so? Actually, not necessarily true. Many very high performance tires do not have particularly good tread ratings. Generally the higher the speed rating (tires are have speed ratings such as S, H, V, etc) the less the tread life. That is because a tires ability to run at higher speeds depends partly on using a softer tread compound that wears faster. This is very evident in motor sports racing, where a very soft, but very high performance tire will need to be changed several times during a 500 mile race. Some people think that an S speed rated tire is sufficient because they will never exceed the 112 mph maximum speed rating for an S rated tire. However, an H, or V rated tire will almost always have superior handling, breaking, etc than a S or T rated tire (all other things being equal). However, there are some newer tread compounds that provide a better balance between performance and tread life, but they are more costly than conventional tread compounds. But even these newer compounds will usually not last 80,000 miles in a high performance V rated tire. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" > wrote in message oups.com... > Price has little to do with quality - no matter what the product. Absolutely not true. What IS true is that paying a lot of money for something doesen't guarentee good quality - you still have to do you research. BUT, it is definitely guarenteed that low price buys you low quality for every honestly gotten product. > always buy cheap. The four tires i have on my car right now combined > cost $150 installed. That even includes the damn charge to GIVE them > my old tires. > Without the size you bought such a statement is meaningless. Ted |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
>>but within a type and brand, I'd think a tire rated for 80,000 miles would cost more than one rated for 40,000 miles, is that not so?
all things equal, of course. But do they cost more per x miles driven? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > "Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" > wrote in message > oups.com... > > Price has little to do with quality - no matter what the product. > > Absolutely not true. > > What IS true is that paying a lot of money for something doesen't guarentee > good quality - you still have to do you research. > > BUT, it is definitely guarenteed that low price buys you low quality > for every honestly gotten product. > > > always buy cheap. The four tires i have on my car right now combined > > cost $150 installed. That even includes the damn charge to GIVE them > > my old tires. > > > > Without the size you bought such a statement is meaningless. > Unless he has 12 inch tires, that's damn cheap. Size notwithstanding. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tire question: buy pricier or more often? | RPS | Driving | 42 | June 25th 05 03:39 AM |
Calculating Tire Pressure question? | Tom Nakashima | VW air cooled | 3 | May 4th 05 02:28 PM |
Tire bubble question | Nick | Honda | 2 | May 4th 05 02:11 AM |
Interesting...Expired Tires | Patrick | Ford Mustang | 4 | November 10th 04 03:42 AM |
Attn Tire experts. Tire valve stem question | Jim Smith | Saturn | 1 | June 17th 04 07:03 AM |