Hard evidence needed...

* wrote:
> Sniff! Sniff!
>
> Do I detect the faint odor of litigation here?
>
> Do the reasons REALLY "....take too long to go into....."?
>
> Or do you just NOT want to make it known that any "hard evidence" provided
> might be used in a lawsuit - with the subsequent subpoena of any "expert"
> providing such information?

Dude.

Okay, the short version is that my STBX is having an aneurism about our
kid riding with me in the truck. She is paranoid, but she may be
right. Personally, I hope there is hard evidence that the driver's
side airbag is NOT a hazard so I can cram it up her ass. But, if the
contrary is true, no reason to put my son in jeapordy, is there?

Secondly, if I'm asking for hard, verifiable evidence, why the ****
would I need to subpoena some phantom computer identity off usenet when
I've got an intstitutional study to prove or disprove my findings?

You should get out more.

No, really.

-Phil Crow

Marsh Monster > wrote in article
.com>...
> .
> .
> =============
> =============
> * wrote in message:
>
>
> > Sniff! Sniff!
> >
> > Do I detect the faint odor of litigation here?
> >
> > Do the reasons REALLY "....take too long to go into....."?
> >
> > Or do you just NOT want to make it known that any "hard evidence"
provided
> > might be used in a lawsuit - with the subsequent subpoena of any
"expert"
> > providing such information?
>
> ===========
> ===========
>
> You live in a weird world man.........
>
> life so good you worry about **** like that?
>
>
> lmao
>


It is obvious that you have never been subpoenaed as an "expert witness" in
a "wrongful death" lawsuit.....

.......unfortunately, I have been.....TWICE!

The second one almost cost me my business when I missed a contractual
deadline due to being in court.

My cynicism is well-grounded.

Once burned.....twice shy!

wrote in article
.com>...
>
> * wrote:
> > Sniff! Sniff!
> >
> > Do I detect the faint odor of litigation here?
> >
> > Do the reasons REALLY "....take too long to go into....."?
> >
> > Or do you just NOT want to make it known that any "hard evidence"
provided
> > might be used in a lawsuit - with the subsequent subpoena of any
"expert"
> > providing such information?
>
> Dude.
>
> Okay, the short version is that my STBX is having an aneurism about our
> kid riding with me in the truck. She is paranoid, but she may be
> right. Personally, I hope there is hard evidence that the driver's
> side airbag is NOT a hazard so I can cram it up her ass. But, if the
> contrary is true, no reason to put my son in jeapordy, is there?
>
> Secondly, if I'm asking for hard, verifiable evidence, why the ****
> would I need to subpoena some phantom computer identity off usenet when
> I've got an intstitutional study to prove or disprove my findings?
>
> You should get out more.
>
> No, really.


You came across like a lawyer trying to find an "expert witness" to call
upon in a lawsuit of some sort.

Been there, done that, and - trust me - they frown on wearing the T-shirt
in court.

You probably would have elicited many more responses if you hadn't come
across as being so clandestine about it all...... "Ex-wife thinks my
truck's air bag is unsafe for the kid. Any evidence to the contrary?"

Don't think a "phantom identity" is any way of stopping someone who really
wants to know who you are. I - like many others - just use it to avoid SPAM
and UCE.

* wrote:
> You came across like a lawyer trying to find an "expert witness" to call
> upon in a lawsuit of some sort.

And you come across as a trolling moron with a one-character name.

Kaz Kylheku > wrote in article
.com>...
> * wrote:
> > You came across like a lawyer trying to find an "expert witness" to
call
> > upon in a lawsuit of some sort.
>
> And you come across as a trolling moron with a one-character name.
>
>

"Kaz Kylheku" is, somehow, better?

"Mike Romain" > wrote in message
...

> It's a good question too.... Airbags even kill short drivers.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00

Friend's daughter was recently involved in an accident where the
airbag deployed. The young lady sustained a pretty severe cut
to her leg, but came out pretty well, all in all.

The airbag abraded a lot of skin off her, which was in itself pretty severe.
Despite the fact that an airbag can hurt you, I guess it is proven that they
save
lives too.

Someone told me that the designers have modified the pressurization on the
bags to make them tamer in later model cars. Maybe someone here know
if that is true.

wrote:
>
> "Mike Romain" > wrote in message
> ...
>
> > It's a good question too.... Airbags even kill short drivers.
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>
> Friend's daughter was recently involved in an accident where the
> airbag deployed. The young lady sustained a pretty severe cut
> to her leg, but came out pretty well, all in all.
>
> The airbag abraded a lot of skin off her, which was in itself pretty severe.
> Despite the fact that an airbag can hurt you, I guess it is proven that they
> save
> lives too.

I don't get your point....

It injured her you say. So that little fender bender ding that most
would walk away from with a cuss word or two turned into an injury
accident.

She is lucky. Last year one of those killed a Toronto woman. Broke her
neck if I remember right. The cops figured she would have walked away
with no injury otherwise.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

..
..
========
========
wrote:
> * wrote:
> > Sniff! Sniff!
> >
> > Do I detect the faint odor of litigation here?
> >
> > Do the reasons REALLY "....take too long to go into....."?
> >
> > Or do you just NOT want to make it known that any "hard evidence" provided
> > might be used in a lawsuit - with the subsequent subpoena of any "expert"
> > providing such information?
>
> Dude.
>
> Okay, the short version is that my STBX is having an aneurism about our
> kid riding with me in the truck. She is paranoid, but she may be
> right. Personally, I hope there is hard evidence that the driver's
> side airbag is NOT a hazard so I can cram it up her ass. But, if the
> contrary is true, no reason to put my son in jeapordy, is there?
>
> Secondly, if I'm asking for hard, verifiable evidence, why the ****
> would I need to subpoena some phantom computer identity off usenet when
> I've got an intstitutional study to prove or disprove my findings?
>
> You should get out more.
>
> No, really.
>
> -Phil Crow
=========
=========

I agree, keep him caged.

Better yet.......
let him out during hunting season.





~"~
MarshMonster
~:~