If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
More "pie in the sky" alternate fuel nonsense
Anyone remember "fuel cells?" Back in the 1980s, companies
like Ballard Power were going to change the world by producing vehicles that ran on them. What happened? Not much. Now it's hydrogen power. Clean, cheap, etc, etc. What's the catch? You can't store enough in a car (unless you want a vehicle that looks like the Mad Max mobile) to go any distance. So now they are working to develop new materials to store it in some solid form. Good luck. It's not going to happen this decade, maybe not this century. http://www.physorg.com/news4721.html What WILL happen is that they'll develop ultra high pressure vessels to store hydrogen in it's traditional liquid form, and when one of those things runs into a wall, or a car, it won't be like a propane vehicle leak (which is bad enough)where they have to close down a whole block for fear of detonation, the hydrogen vehicle will go off like a small nuclear bomb. Do we really want this kind of thing on the road? Gasoline is safe. It's not stored under pressure and it takes a big accident to make it ignite, and when it does ignite, unlike in the movies, it doesn't go off like 10lbs of dynamite, it just flares. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote:
> Do we really want this kind of thing on > the road? We need something because, in case you haven't been paying attention to oil prices, gasoline is getting scarce, and it's only going to get scarcer. Sometimes cold, hard facts are tough to face. The real problem with hydrogen isn't storage or combustibility. Those can be managed, albeit with some inconvenience and compromise. The problem is that hydrogen isn't a primary energy source. It doesn't come from a hole in the ground. It has to be made from something else -- currently either from natural gas, which process is dirty and produces CO2, or from electrolysis of water, which is expensive, requiring electrical power. My vision of our best energy future is safe, modern nuclear plants (augmented with wind, tidal, solar, and whatever else can be made economical) that generate electrical power efficiently enough to make hydrogen feasible. If you crash and explode, so be it. Slow down, at least in traffic. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
It's presently projected that in another 20 years you will see
hydrogen stations all over the place, just as in the beginning, gas stations were very rare. The vehicle designs are moving toward storage in cells throughout the chassis rather than a single tank in the trunk. Essentially, the cabin area sits over the propulsion section. There is even talk of a capsule type cabin much like those used for hydroplanes which, in the event of an explosion would separate from the propulsion unit. Electrolysis will continue to be the method of breaking down water. Hydrogen's waste byproduct is water vapor, which is even safe to drink right from the exhaust (if you're that hard up for something to drink). Present hydrogen storage is safer than gasoline according to the latest crash tests. Hydrogen produces more power per volume (60-80% vs gasoline's roughly 40%). As for gasoline being safer... that's relative. True that in "most" cases, it burns rather than explodes, however, when it does explode it does so with the equivalence of approximately 12 sticks of dynamite per gallon (California Department of Justice Crime Lab) depending on the amount of vapor. Hydrogen tends to dissipate rapidly in air in the small amounts used for vehicle propulsion, while gasoline will easily soak clothing, etc, and it's oily properties cause it to adhere, thus making it harder to get rid of in the event of an ignition. If you want something to fear.... take one LNP container ship parked in any port, and have it explode. If you want cheaper, environmentally friendly, then we are back to hitching up animals. Of course, they won't be setting any records in the quarter mile..... I'm waiting for Ron Propeil to come up with something new to go with the Chop-O-Matic.... On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:10:43 -0400, RichA > wrote: >Anyone remember "fuel cells?" Back in the 1980s, companies >like Ballard Power were going to change the world by producing >vehicles that ran on them. What happened? Not much. >Now it's hydrogen power. Clean, cheap, etc, etc. >What's the catch? >You can't store enough in a car (unless you want a vehicle that looks >like the Mad Max mobile) to go any distance. >So now they are working to develop new materials to store it in some >solid form. Good luck. It's not going to happen this decade, maybe >not this century. > >http://www.physorg.com/news4721.html > >What WILL happen is that they'll develop ultra high pressure vessels >to store hydrogen in it's traditional liquid form, and when one of >those things runs into a wall, or a car, it won't be like a propane >vehicle leak (which is bad enough)where they have to close down a >whole block for fear of detonation, the hydrogen vehicle will go off >like a small nuclear bomb. Do we really want this kind of thing on >the road? Gasoline is safe. It's not stored under pressure and it >takes a big accident to make it ignite, and when it does ignite, >unlike in the movies, it doesn't go off like 10lbs of dynamite, it >just flares. > > Hey! Spikey Likes IT! 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:45:44 -0700, Spike > wrote:
>It's presently projected that in another 20 years you will see >hydrogen stations all over the place, just as in the beginning, gas >stations were very rare. > You'll have to see them all over, since you'll be filling up every 50 miles. >The vehicle designs are moving toward storage in cells throughout the >chassis rather than a single tank in the trunk. Essentially, the cabin >area sits over the propulsion section. There is even talk of a capsule >type cabin much like those used for hydroplanes which, in the event of >an explosion would separate from the propulsion unit. > >Electrolysis will continue to be the method of breaking down water. >Hydrogen's waste byproduct is water vapor, which is even safe to >drink right from the exhaust (if you're that hard up for something to >drink). Present hydrogen storage is safer than gasoline according to >the latest crash tests. Hydrogen produces more power per volume >(60-80% vs gasoline's roughly 40%). Only because it's on buses where you can afford to use space to reinforced the tanks. Cars are another matter. > >As for gasoline being safer... that's relative. True that in "most" >cases, it burns rather than explodes, however, when it does explode it >does so with the equivalence of approximately 12 sticks of dynamite >per gallon (California Department of Justice Crime Lab) depending on >the amount of vapor. Hydrogen tends to dissipate rapidly in air in the >small amounts used for vehicle propulsion, while gasoline will easily >soak clothing, etc, and it's oily properties cause it to adhere, thus >making it harder to get rid of in the event of an ignition. > >If you want something to fear.... take one LNP container ship parked >in any port, and have it explode. > >If you want cheaper, environmentally friendly, then we are back to >hitching up animals. Of course, they won't be setting any records in >the quarter mile..... I'm waiting for Ron Propeil to come up with >something new to go with the Chop-O-Matic.... > > >On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:10:43 -0400, RichA > wrote: > >>Anyone remember "fuel cells?" Back in the 1980s, companies >>like Ballard Power were going to change the world by producing >>vehicles that ran on them. What happened? Not much. >>Now it's hydrogen power. Clean, cheap, etc, etc. >>What's the catch? >>You can't store enough in a car (unless you want a vehicle that looks >>like the Mad Max mobile) to go any distance. >>So now they are working to develop new materials to store it in some >>solid form. Good luck. It's not going to happen this decade, maybe >>not this century. >> >>http://www.physorg.com/news4721.html >> >>What WILL happen is that they'll develop ultra high pressure vessels >>to store hydrogen in it's traditional liquid form, and when one of >>those things runs into a wall, or a car, it won't be like a propane >>vehicle leak (which is bad enough)where they have to close down a >>whole block for fear of detonation, the hydrogen vehicle will go off >>like a small nuclear bomb. Do we really want this kind of thing on >>the road? Gasoline is safe. It's not stored under pressure and it >>takes a big accident to make it ignite, and when it does ignite, >>unlike in the movies, it doesn't go off like 10lbs of dynamite, it >>just flares. >> >> > >Hey! Spikey Likes IT! >1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok >Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior >Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" >w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Like anything else... improvements are constant. The manufacturers
will push the envelope of engineering to exceed limitations because they know there's no profit in something nobody will buy. And apparently, you didn't see the prototypes I looked at. The same cab forward look of the GM types, the interior floor space was pretty wide open. The propulsion unit with fuel storage (not counting wheel height) is approximately 8" deep. Apparently for repairs, the cabin separates from the propulsion unit. Not too bad a concept for starters. But, what's the problem? New technologies come along all the time. They don't spread through the masses overnight. It takes years. Consider the time it took for computers to go from monsters with less power than the pocket calculator to the pc and notebooks of today. Or how long it took Al Gore to create the internet and spread it, with Bill gates help, around the globe.... >> >You'll have to see them all over, since you'll be filling up every 50 >miles. > >>The vehicle designs are moving toward storage in cells throughout the >>chassis rather than a single tank in the trunk. Essentially, the cabin >>area sits over the propulsion section. There is even talk of a capsule >>type cabin much like those used for hydroplanes which, in the event of >>an explosion would separate from the propulsion unit. >> >>Electrolysis will continue to be the method of breaking down water. >>Hydrogen's waste byproduct is water vapor, which is even safe to >>drink right from the exhaust (if you're that hard up for something to >>drink). Present hydrogen storage is safer than gasoline according to >>the latest crash tests. Hydrogen produces more power per volume >>(60-80% vs gasoline's roughly 40%). > >Only because it's on buses where you can afford to use space to >reinforced the tanks. Cars are another matter. >> >>As for gasoline being safer... that's relative. True that in "most" >>cases, it burns rather than explodes, however, when it does explode it >>does so with the equivalence of approximately 12 sticks of dynamite >>per gallon (California Department of Justice Crime Lab) depending on >>the amount of vapor. Hydrogen tends to dissipate rapidly in air in the >>small amounts used for vehicle propulsion, while gasoline will easily >>soak clothing, etc, and it's oily properties cause it to adhere, thus >>making it harder to get rid of in the event of an ignition. >> >>If you want something to fear.... take one LNP container ship parked >>in any port, and have it explode. >> >>If you want cheaper, environmentally friendly, then we are back to >>hitching up animals. Of course, they won't be setting any records in >>the quarter mile..... I'm waiting for Ron Propeil to come up with >>something new to go with the Chop-O-Matic.... >> >> >>On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:10:43 -0400, RichA > wrote: >> >>>Anyone remember "fuel cells?" Back in the 1980s, companies >>>like Ballard Power were going to change the world by producing >>>vehicles that ran on them. What happened? Not much. >>>Now it's hydrogen power. Clean, cheap, etc, etc. >>>What's the catch? >>>You can't store enough in a car (unless you want a vehicle that looks >>>like the Mad Max mobile) to go any distance. >>>So now they are working to develop new materials to store it in some >>>solid form. Good luck. It's not going to happen this decade, maybe >>>not this century. >>> >>>http://www.physorg.com/news4721.html >>> >>>What WILL happen is that they'll develop ultra high pressure vessels >>>to store hydrogen in it's traditional liquid form, and when one of >>>those things runs into a wall, or a car, it won't be like a propane >>>vehicle leak (which is bad enough)where they have to close down a >>>whole block for fear of detonation, the hydrogen vehicle will go off >>>like a small nuclear bomb. Do we really want this kind of thing on >>>the road? Gasoline is safe. It's not stored under pressure and it >>>takes a big accident to make it ignite, and when it does ignite, >>>unlike in the movies, it doesn't go off like 10lbs of dynamite, it >>>just flares. >>> >>> >> >>Hey! Spikey Likes IT! >>1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok >>Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior >>Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" >>w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16 Hey! Spikey Likes IT! 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Spike wrote:
> Or > how long it took Al Gore to create the internet and spread it, with > Bill gates help, around the globe.... This never fails to **** me off. Gore never claimed any such thing. It's a big ****ing wing-nut LIE! Gore took credit, rightfully, for shedherding the Internet through the government and opening it to the public, when just about everyone else in government was completely uninterested and clueless. All of us who use the Internet owe him a lot of gratitude. People who actually DID invent the Internet, like Vinton G. Cerf, give Gore a great deal of credit. If you're interested in the true story, and not the stupid, dishonest wing-nut spin, see: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/ BTW, Bill Gates had nothing to do with the Internet. He thought it was oversold and overhyped, and he was dead wrong. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
My personal belief is that we will see more and more diesels on the road...
biodiesel well in excess of 50% will become normal. Fuel cell technology is still pricey while biodiesel (5% ) is a reality. Who knows what we may wake up to in the morning? Whatever, I think it will be nothing less than interesting. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I wonder why it is that it's OK to make jokes about the president, or
even to slander, but say something against Al Gore and it's like spitting on the Pope. Why are his supporters so darn defensive. Is it because they know he is a flake? They must have watched those Uncle Adolf speeches. I'd vote for Ted kennedy before I'd vote for Gore.... and that's going wayyyyyyyy off the deep end. And, no, I'm not a Republican either. On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 04:19:51 GMT, rw > wrote: >Spike wrote: > >> Or >> how long it took Al Gore to create the internet and spread it, with >> Bill gates help, around the globe.... > >This never fails to **** me off. Gore never claimed any such thing. It's >a big ****ing wing-nut LIE! Gore took credit, rightfully, for >shedherding the Internet through the government and opening it to the >public, when just about everyone else in government was completely >uninterested and clueless. All of us who use the Internet owe him a lot >of gratitude. People who actually DID invent the Internet, like Vinton >G. Cerf, give Gore a great deal of credit. If you're interested in the >true story, and not the stupid, dishonest wing-nut spin, see: > >http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/ > >BTW, Bill Gates had nothing to do with the Internet. He thought it was >oversold and overhyped, and he was dead wrong. Hey! Spikey Likes IT! 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
rw wrote:
> Spike wrote: > >> Or >> how long it took Al Gore to create the internet and spread it, with >> Bill gates help, around the globe.... > > > This never fails to **** me off. Gore never claimed any such thing. It's > a big ****ing wing-nut LIE! Gore took credit, rightfully, for > shedherding the Internet through the government and opening it to the > public, when just about everyone else in government was completely > uninterested and clueless. All of us who use the Internet owe him a lot > of gratitude. People who actually DID invent the Internet, like Vinton > G. Cerf, give Gore a great deal of credit. If you're interested in the > true story, and not the stupid, dishonest wing-nut spin, see: > > http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/ > > BTW, Bill Gates had nothing to do with the Internet. He thought it was > oversold and overhyped, and he was dead wrong. > I think when Gore made that comment he was being self serving. Just as he was when he halted the presidential election of 2000. here's an e-mail from Vinton G. Cerf http://web.archive.org/web/200001250...904/vcerf.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote:
> Anyone remember "fuel cells?" Back in the 1980s, companies > like Ballard Power were going to change the world by producing > vehicles that ran on them. What happened? Not much. > Now it's hydrogen power. Clean, cheap, etc, etc. > What's the catch? > You can't store enough in a car (unless you want a vehicle that looks > like the Mad Max mobile) to go any distance. > So now they are working to develop new materials to store it in some > solid form. Good luck. It's not going to happen this decade, maybe > not this century. > Actually a fuel cell is powered by Hydrogen and fuel cells have been in use by NASA for years. I've read an article about small home generators being run by them. Running a car won't be much farther away. -- "Network management is like trying to herd cats." -- Unknown "I wonder how much deeper the ocean would be without sponges?" -- TazAmd - Humor Section Gettingtogather.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
warman i am surprised you mix oil | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 5 | May 8th 05 04:04 AM |
DaimlerChrysler Commits Over $70 Million to Fuel Cell | Shrike | Dodge | 0 | March 30th 05 09:03 PM |
Failed Smog Check 1981 Trans AM | TheSmogTech | Technology | 0 | January 30th 05 04:16 PM |
Infiniti Q45 oil pan removal procedure | Miki | Technology | 25 | December 30th 04 12:07 AM |
76 Difficult Cold Starts | daveo76 | Corvette | 22 | September 9th 04 12:54 AM |