If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Extended-warranty prices in the UK have been affected by external factors
(recent change in regulatory environment). DAS -- For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling --- "Neil" > wrote in message ... [...] > I think the OP was actually more POd that the price of the extended > warranty > had increased since the original quote. I'd certainly be kicking myself > too > for missing the boat. > |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Paul Aspinall > wrote: > However, I am wondering what BMW's stance would be, if something went > wrong with the engine / gearbox on my 745Li, if it were not under > warranty. What would they do, with regards to 'Goodwill'?? I believe > that an engine / gearbox on a £78000 car should last at least 200,000 > miles..... Many cars will do this sort of mileage on the original power train if well maintained and driven sympathetically. But then many drivers don't give a toss about their cars and cane them from cold. Because they change them long before this mileage. As do most who buy a *new* 78,000 quid car. And in the UK such a car will invariably not belong directly to the first driver - it will be company owned or leased. I'd guess you haven't bought the car from new, but expect BMW to be generous with a warranty even although you don't know how the car was treated in its earlier life. > Has anyone ever had any experience of BMW contributing when the car is > out of warranty? They're more likely to on a one owner car with full main dealer service history. -- *Succeed, in spite of management * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
you tell him Fred... he wreaks of snobbery, but he is a wannabe snob, he
thinks like a guy who buys a 745li new but bought it used because he's cheap... hence the free warranty bull****. You knew the warranty when you bought the car, too late to complain now! And Marcio made some good points, the more you pay, the less warranty you get, you have the $$ to pay the repair so you should not care, if you don't have the cash, then don't drive the car. Maybe a Hyundai would suit your warranty needs better! "Malt_Hound" > wrote in message ... > Paul Aspinall wrote: >> "Malt_Hound" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>Paul Aspinall wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>Because I paid £78000 for a car, and I believe it should have a better >>>>warranty than 3 years. >>> >>>Now you know the difference between perception and reality. You may >>>exist in either one, your choice... >>> >>> >>>>In addition, I was told at the time of sale, that the BMW extended >>>>warranty would be £1553 for 3 extra years.... now its £1536 for 1 >>>>year!!!! >>> >>>You were *told*? Hah. Well then, you should have purchased the warranty >>>at that time, then you would have known what the cost would be. >>> >>>How on earth could you (or anyone) receive a quote for this (or anything) >>>and expect it to remain the same three years later? >>> >>>Are you really this naive? >> >> >> No, because I only bought the car 12 months ago.... not three years ago. > > My mistake. I was under the impression that you were the original owner. > So then you actually bought the car used, which was when they gave you > this story about the extended warranty? If this is the case, then that > makes the whole idea of getting anything out of BMW in terms of goodwill > warranty coverage even more remote, *unless* (and here's the key) coverage > was agreed to at the time of purchase. > > Here is the US it is very common to buy used (certified) BMWs from BMW new > car dealers with an included extended warranty. But even those generally > only go to 6 years or 100k miles. > >> >> Your tone is very demeaning... which is probably indicative of why you >> are not riding round in a 745Li. > > I'm sorry that it seems demeaning to you, but I'm sure a lot of that has > to do with your particular perspective. Since I'm not telling you what > you want to hear you think I'm being mean. OTOH those that agree with > your opine that BMW should cover your car to an unprecedentedly high > mileage, gratis, just because it was originally an expensive car are > offering "constructive" comments. > > My "tone" has nothing to do with why I am not riding in a 745Li. I'm sure > they are very nice cars if you like them, but to be perfectly honest with > you I don't really like the 7 series cars (even the old ones) and the > latest crop seem like bloated, over-gimmicked-up land barges to me. The > 7's seem to be aimed more at the traditional Mercedes market market to me. > In my opinion, the essence of BMW is in its sporting heritage, and somehow > the 7 series just do not fit in with that. But I respect your opinion may > be different and, as I said, I'm sure it is a nice car. > > I also choose not to spend my hard earned money on an automobile that will > lose half (or more) of its value in a matter of a few years. You see, I > too buy used cars. But I pick them up when they have already experienced > the majority of their depreciation. Of course, I fully expect that my > BMWs will run to 200k miles or more. I just don't expect anyone to > guarantee that. > > Furthermore, Paul, your personal comment about what I'm "riding around in" > smacks of snobbery. I'm sure that was not your intention, now was it? > > -Fred W |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Yawn......
Is that your best? "SharkmanBMW" > wrote in message ... > you tell him Fred... he wreaks of snobbery, but he is a wannabe snob, he > thinks like a guy who buys a 745li new but bought it used because he's > cheap... hence the free warranty bull****. > You knew the warranty when you bought the car, too late to complain now! > And Marcio made some good points, the more you pay, the less warranty you > get, you have the $$ to pay the repair so you should not care, if you > don't have the cash, then don't drive the car. > Maybe a Hyundai would suit your warranty needs better! > > "Malt_Hound" > wrote in message > ... >> Paul Aspinall wrote: >>> "Malt_Hound" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>>>Paul Aspinall wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Because I paid £78000 for a car, and I believe it should have a better >>>>>warranty than 3 years. >>>> >>>>Now you know the difference between perception and reality. You may >>>>exist in either one, your choice... >>>> >>>> >>>>>In addition, I was told at the time of sale, that the BMW extended >>>>>warranty would be £1553 for 3 extra years.... now its £1536 for 1 >>>>>year!!!! >>>> >>>>You were *told*? Hah. Well then, you should have purchased the >>>>warranty at that time, then you would have known what the cost would be. >>>> >>>>How on earth could you (or anyone) receive a quote for this (or >>>>anything) and expect it to remain the same three years later? >>>> >>>>Are you really this naive? >>> >>> >>> No, because I only bought the car 12 months ago.... not three years ago. >> >> My mistake. I was under the impression that you were the original owner. >> So then you actually bought the car used, which was when they gave you >> this story about the extended warranty? If this is the case, then that >> makes the whole idea of getting anything out of BMW in terms of goodwill >> warranty coverage even more remote, *unless* (and here's the key) >> coverage was agreed to at the time of purchase. >> >> Here is the US it is very common to buy used (certified) BMWs from BMW >> new car dealers with an included extended warranty. But even those >> generally only go to 6 years or 100k miles. >> >>> >>> Your tone is very demeaning... which is probably indicative of why you >>> are not riding round in a 745Li. >> >> I'm sorry that it seems demeaning to you, but I'm sure a lot of that has >> to do with your particular perspective. Since I'm not telling you what >> you want to hear you think I'm being mean. OTOH those that agree with >> your opine that BMW should cover your car to an unprecedentedly high >> mileage, gratis, just because it was originally an expensive car are >> offering "constructive" comments. >> >> My "tone" has nothing to do with why I am not riding in a 745Li. I'm >> sure they are very nice cars if you like them, but to be perfectly honest >> with you I don't really like the 7 series cars (even the old ones) and >> the latest crop seem like bloated, over-gimmicked-up land barges to me. >> The 7's seem to be aimed more at the traditional Mercedes market market >> to me. In my opinion, the essence of BMW is in its sporting heritage, and >> somehow the 7 series just do not fit in with that. But I respect your >> opinion may be different and, as I said, I'm sure it is a nice car. >> >> I also choose not to spend my hard earned money on an automobile that >> will lose half (or more) of its value in a matter of a few years. You >> see, I too buy used cars. But I pick them up when they have already >> experienced the majority of their depreciation. Of course, I fully >> expect that my BMWs will run to 200k miles or more. I just don't expect >> anyone to guarantee that. >> >> Furthermore, Paul, your personal comment about what I'm "riding around >> in" smacks of snobbery. I'm sure that was not your intention, now was >> it? >> >> -Fred W > > |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Marcio Watanabe" > wrote in message news > "Paul Aspinall" > wrote: > > >Because I paid £78000 for a car, and I believe it should have a better > >warranty than 3 years. > > Reality doesn't agree with what you believe. A Bentley Arnage and a > Rolls-Royce Phantom cost 2-3 times as much as a 745Li, and they have a > 3-year warranty. A Ferrari 612 and a Lamborghini Murcielago also > costs 2-3 times as much and have only a 2-year warranty. A Hyundai > costs a fraction of what a 745Li costs, and the warranty of a Hyundai > is 5 years. So, if you want to assume anything (and I don't think you > can), one can assume that cars that cost more have shorter warranties, > not the other way around. > > And if you think about it, it makes some sense. First, the more a car > costs, the less price sensitive the buyer is. The less sensitive the > buyer is, the less likely the person is to be driving an old car, so > longer warranties make less sense on a $100K car than on a $20K one. > Second, warranty is a marketing tool more than anything else. Less > expensive brands lengthen their warranties compared to the competition > to try to get more buyers, and prominently display their warranties on > commercials. Buyers of more expensive cars care much less about that. > A buyer of a $100K car should have no problem paying for a > non-warranty repair, and the repair would be more an annoyance than a > financial setback. A buyer of a $20K car, on the other hand, could be > financially strained if having to pay for a major repair. Well stated, Marcio. Over here, Hyundai is offering 10 year warranties now. Does that mean their engineering is that much superior to what it was 3 years ago? Of course not. It's a marketing tool, that is more important in the lower end, as you point out. -Russ. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"Somebody" > wrote in message ... > <snip> > > Over here, Hyundai is offering 10 year warranties now. Does that mean their > engineering is that much superior to what it was 3 years ago? Of course > not. It's a marketing tool, that is more important in the lower end, as you > point out. > > -Russ. > > If customer satisfaction can be used as part-measurement of improved engineering, then we can say that Hyundai has improved in this area. I say part-measurement because clearly there are other factors to consider when measuring 'engineering superiority', which I believe you use to mean longevity, as opposed to power-to-weight ratios, front/rear balance, tolerances between body panels, or even MPG, for example. While it's true that a warranty is in-part a marketing tool, I think it's safe to assume they [Hyundai] are also now more confident in the longevity of their product, than they were during the days of the Excel. If not, then what a gamble to play with the risk of having to honour warranties when they fail before the 10/100 limit is reached. It's amusing to me that Hyundai has taken the place more recently of Skoda as the poster boy for poor quality. Does anyone even make Skoda jokes any more? ;-) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
In article <6JSke.935$Ri3.426@trnddc09>,
marlin > wrote: > > The car is automatic, so its impossible to over-rev it. > Um no, an automatic can be overreved, all it would take is a faulty rev > limiter. No, the rev limiter acts on the engine. The auto box changes up before you hit it. And won't allow a downshift near it. So you'd need two failures in practise. -- *Why doesn't Tarzan have a beard? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
In article >,
Somebody > wrote: > Over here, Hyundai is offering 10 year warranties now. Does that mean > their engineering is that much superior to what it was 3 years ago? Of > course not. It's a marketing tool, that is more important in the lower > end, as you point out. Is the warranty transferrable? And has the car got to be serviced by dealers? The likelihood of many buying a new Hyundai and keeping it for 10 years is small, as is it being dealer serviced. So it's good publicity for a rare occurrence in practice. -- *I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Neil wrote:
> > If customer satisfaction can be used as part-measurement of improved > engineering, then we can say that Hyundai has improved in this area. I say > part-measurement because clearly there are other factors to consider when > measuring 'engineering superiority', which I believe you use to mean > longevity, as opposed to power-to-weight ratios, front/rear balance, > tolerances between body panels, or even MPG, for example. While it's true > that a warranty is in-part a marketing tool, I think it's safe to assume > they [Hyundai] are also now more confident in the longevity of their > product, than they were during the days of the Excel. If not, then what a > gamble to play with the risk of having to honour warranties when they fail > before the 10/100 limit is reached. > > It's amusing to me that Hyundai has taken the place more recently of Skoda > as the poster boy for poor quality. Does anyone even make Skoda jokes any > more? ;-) > Certainly not on this side of the Atlantic (left). We don't even know what a Skoda looks like... Over here, Hyundai is getting a better rep now, while Kia and Scion seem to have taken over the lowest spots. -Fred W |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Plowman (News)" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Somebody > wrote: > > Over here, Hyundai is offering 10 year warranties now. Does that mean > > their engineering is that much superior to what it was 3 years ago? Of > > course not. It's a marketing tool, that is more important in the lower > > end, as you point out. > > Is the warranty transferrable? And has the car got to be serviced by > dealers? > > The likelihood of many buying a new Hyundai and keeping it for 10 years is > small, as is it being dealer serviced. So it's good publicity for a rare > occurrence in practice. A new car does not *ever* need to to be serviced by the dealer except for warranty work, but, you must have proof of service by another mechanic according to the maintenance schedule. The requirement for all service to be at the dealer is an urban myth designed to generate revenue for dealers. Home changing your oil will invalidate your warranty though. -Russ. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|