If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:19:17 -0700, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote: >As we all know, ramp metering signals are intended to space out cars >that are entering the freeway and make merging easier. Clearly, there >is nothing to be gained by making the FIRST car in a cluster stop for >the ramp metering signal; after all, it may have been several minutes >or even several hours since the last car came through. If a driver who >KNOWS that no other car has come through recently decides to simply >blow through the red metering signal instead of making an unnecesasary >stop, should that driver get a ticket? > >What Would Jaybird Do? What will happen is that the person behind him will push him out of the frickin way. Or at least they should. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
Sounds like the design of these metering ramp signals, if they are
supposed to function as described (preventing groups of vehicles from entering more or less all at once by spacing out the entry time of vehicles onto the ramp) is (SURPRIZE!) screwed up. Sounds like the signal should be default green, then as a vehicle passes it (tripping the sensor), it should go to a red phase, length of this phase dependant on the level of traffic on the freeway (if practically no traffic, say at night, then skip the red phase). This clearly address the OP's concern (if no vehicles entered for a while, then the first one of a new group gets in without stopping) while retaining the stop/go (er, metering) spacing of the following vehicles in the group. So, let's hear what's wrong with my analysis... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
"Sir Ray" > wrote in message oups.com... > Sounds like the design of these metering ramp signals, if they are > supposed to function as described (preventing groups of vehicles from > entering more or less all at once by spacing out the entry time of > vehicles onto the ramp) is (SURPRIZE!) screwed up. > Sounds like the signal should be default green, then as a vehicle > passes it (tripping the sensor), it should go to a red phase, length of > this phase dependant on the level of traffic on the freeway (if > practically no traffic, say at night, then skip the red phase). This > clearly address the OP's concern (if no vehicles entered for a while, > then the first one of a new group gets in without stopping) while > retaining the stop/go (er, metering) spacing of the following vehicles > in the group. > So, let's hear what's wrong with my analysis... > Easy. You can't ticket someone for running a green light. C'mon man, give us a CHALLENGE at least |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
Mike T. wrote:
> "Sir Ray" > wrote in message > > So, let's hear what's wrong with my analysis... > > > > Easy. You can't ticket someone for running a green light. C'mon man, give > us a CHALLENGE at least OK, what's wrong from an engineering standpoint... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
Sir Ray wrote:
> Mike T. wrote: > > "Sir Ray" > wrote in message > > > So, let's hear what's wrong with my analysis... > > > > > > > Easy. You can't ticket someone for running a green light. C'mon man, give > > us a CHALLENGE at least > > OK, what's wrong from an engineering standpoint... Hint- cast a glimpse toward an entrance ramp during a period of high traffic volume. How are you going to stop vehicles 2 through 30? ----- - gpsman |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
>> > So, let's hear what's wrong with my analysis... >> > >> >> Easy. You can't ticket someone for running a green light. C'mon man, >> give >> us a CHALLENGE at least > > OK, what's wrong from an engineering standpoint... > Easy, the traffic engineers don't get kickbacks for tailoring their designs to match political goals (of revenue collection). THAT'S what's wrong with it from an engineering standpoint... (I guess you thought traffic engineers were concerned with things like maximizing traffic throughput and traffic safety? Nope, money talks in that crowd also) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
> Hint- cast a glimpse toward an entrance ramp during a period of high
> traffic volume. How are you going to stop vehicles 2 through 30? > ----- > > - gpsman > Well last I checked, red meant stop. What was the question again? -Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
"Mike T." > wrote in message
reenews.net... > > Hint- cast a glimpse toward an entrance ramp during a period of high > > traffic volume. How are you going to stop vehicles 2 through 30? > > ----- > > > > - gpsman > > > > Well last I checked, red meant stop. What was the question again? -Dave > > The original question that started this thread, in fact, was phrased more or less as: driver is the first and only car on the onramp, so he runs the red signal, and should the cop use "discretion" if he sees that the driver just ran the red signal? So now extend *that* mentality to cars 2 through 30, because at any given moment, one of them will be the first car, even if they aren't the only car. If they all run the red signal, ticket or not ticket, that's a major traffic jam waiting to happen at the minimum. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote: > > > > Well last I checked, red meant stop. What was the question again? -Dave > > > > > The original question that started this thread, in fact, was phrased more or > less as: driver is the first and only car on the onramp, so he runs the red > signal, and should the cop use "discretion" if he sees that the driver just > ran the red signal? > > So now extend *that* mentality to cars 2 through 30, because at any given > moment, one of them will be the first car, even if they aren't the only car. > If they all run the red signal, ticket or not ticket, that's a major traffic > jam waiting to happen at the minimum. That's what the OP did state, but what I suggested was the metering light should be a green by default, and only switch to a (time varying) red phase when a vehicle passes. Therefore, the first vehicle in a while is not stopped by a (unnecessary) metered red phase, and the subsequent vehicles in the group are metered by the red/green phases of the light. If one vehicle blows through a red, then they are liable for a (sucky) citation. After the group passes (i.e. no further vehicles trigger the sensor), then the light returns to it's default green phase. The OP's scenerio fades away, the first vehicle in the group breaks no law as the light is in a green phase, and Jaybird is not waken from his tax-payer financed nap :P |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Another WWJD
"Sir Ray" > wrote in message ps.com... > > Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote: >> > >> > Well last I checked, red meant stop. What was the question >> > gain? -Dave >> > >> > >> The original question that started this thread, in fact, was phrased more >> or >> less as: driver is the first and only car on the onramp, so he runs the >> red >> signal, and should the cop use "discretion" if he sees that the driver >> just >> ran the red signal? >> >> So now extend *that* mentality to cars 2 through 30, because at any given >> moment, one of them will be the first car, even if they aren't the only >> car. >> If they all run the red signal, ticket or not ticket, that's a major >> traffic >> jam waiting to happen at the minimum. > That's what the OP did state, but what I suggested was the metering > light should be a green by default, and only switch to a (time varying) > red phase when a vehicle passes. Therefore, the first vehicle in a > while is not stopped by a (unnecessary) metered red phase, and the > subsequent vehicles in the group are metered by the red/green phases of > the light. If one vehicle blows through a red, then they are liable > for a (sucky) citation. After the group passes (i.e. no further > vehicles trigger the sensor), then the light returns to it's default > green phase. The OP's scenerio fades away, the first vehicle in the > group breaks no law as the light is in a green phase, and Jaybird is > not waken from his tax-payer financed nap :P Perhaps I'm not understanding your "solution" correctly, so let me break it down: 1) The metering light should be green by default until a car passes 2) At that time, it turns to red so the cars behind the first car now have to wait for a phase change one by one I'm not sure what ramps look like where you're from, but here's how they tend to look here in SoCal during times when traffic gets metered... big break and traffic and then a LONG queue of cars heads up the ramp, one right after another... usually as a result of a signal change at the bottom of the ramp. So, if I'm reading your proposal correctly, the 2nd car, which just a couple car lenghts behind the first car, would be expected to *instantly* stop as the phase would immediately change to red as soon as the 1st car passes. The queue of cars, each of which is likely within a few car lengths of each other, would then be required by physics to suddenly perform the same abrupt stop, or some quick evasive maneuvers at least... Gee, I wonder what could be wrong with your "solution"... brink |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One More WWJD | Mike T. | Driving | 9 | October 19th 06 06:15 PM |
Another WWJD | Daniel W. Rouse Jr. | Driving | 2 | October 17th 06 03:15 PM |
Another WWJD | C. E. White[_1_] | Driving | 0 | October 17th 06 01:09 PM |
WWJD (What Would Jaybird Do)? | C. E. White[_1_] | Driving | 0 | October 17th 06 01:06 PM |
WWJD (What Would Jaybird Do)? | Daniel W. Rouse Jr. | Driving | 0 | October 17th 06 09:44 AM |