If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
I intend to!!!!
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > Keep the '04 GC. > > "Jack Carter" > wrote in message > ... > | Well, I drove one yesterday. And, counting me, there were four people in it. > | It felt good. I think my GC would give it some competetion up to about 50. > | Just out of curiosity, I asked them how much to trade. My GC is an '04 > | Limited with 3K miles on it, has all of the options except GPS and > | window-stickered for close to $39K. The RT had a window sticker of $33K > | even. Are you ready??! They'd "put me in it" for a mere $10K difference!!!! > | > | > | > | "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > | ... > | > > | > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: > | > > | > > I used to do a LOT of drag racing myself at local strips. One of the > | road > | > > tests I recently read for the RT quoted a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds. (The > | > > writer said it seemed "sluggish" coming off the line and that there were > | > > times when it didn't feel like it had 340hp.) But I just got a Road & > | Track > | > > that says 6.1. Don't know who to believe. I'm going to drive one this > | > > afternoon so I'll have a better idea of how it might run after that. > | > > | > What source do you have for the 7.1 second 0-60? I would really like to > | > read about that. Every review I have read online have put the 0-60 from > | > 6.0 to 6.3, but nothing slower. Granted I have only read a dozen or so > | > reviews. > | > > | > I have gotten some good data about the torque curve of the engine as well > | > as the gear ratios in the transmission, and have run some numbers using > | > Desktop Dyno and Desktop Dragstrip and it gave similar results as to what > | > the reviews I have read said. Of course, I don't have all the variables, > | > and the software has a tendancy to be a bit "optimistic" if you don't know > | > how to set it up... but it predicted a 14.6 @ 97 MPH quarter mile out of a > | > stock RWD Dodge Magnum. > | > > | > Again, this is very unscientific, and making a lot of assumptions, but I > | > would believe it, on a good day, it could do that. > | > > | > Still, a very sharp looking car! > | > > | > Thanks! > | > Wicked96SS > | > > | > > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > | > > ... > | > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: > | > > > > | > > > > I don't know where you got your GC weight figure but it sounds far > | too > | > > high! > | > > > > I have an '04 GC with the HO V8 and have tested it several times > | with a > | > > > > G-Tech Pro performance meter. It breaks seven seconds from 0-60 > | > > > > consistently. The GC seems to have a very high RPM stall torque > | > > converter > | > > > > and, as a result, really flies off the line. I'm getting faster > | times > | > > from > | > > > > my '04 that the 5.7 liter 98 that I used to have. > | > > > > | > > > It may sound high, but I saw that figure on several websites, and > | Edmunds > | > > > has the vehicle listed at 6100 pounds. > | > > > > | > > > As for sub 7 second 0-60, that is impressive for an SUV! But I have > | also > | > > > read several > | > > > instances whre 0-60's in the Dodge Magnum RT were 6.1 seconds, with a > | 14.6 > | > > > second quarter mile. As a drag racer, to put it in perspective, at > | those > | > > > times and speeds, .9 seconds difference (assuming that the Jeep could > | keep > | > > > up) is about 9 car lengths, substancially faster. > | > > > > | > > > Again, I would really like to see some actual numbers, and not just > | > > > guessing on what the AWD RT would do... I have a feeling it would be > | > > > slightly faster than the Jeep.... although I don't have any facts to > | back > | > > > this up. > | > > > > | > > > Thanks! > | > > > > | > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > | > > > > ... > | > > > > > > | > > > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: > | > > > > > > | > > > > > > From what I've read, anyone who owns an 04 Grand Cherokee with > | the > | > > HO V8 > | > > > > > > (AWD) probably won't take a back seat to an RT AWD in a 0-60 > | run. > | > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > | > > > > > > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > | > > > > > > > | ... > | > > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > Does anybody know what the performance numbers are for the RT > | AWD? > | > > I > | > > > > have > | > > > > > > > found several sources for the RWD version, but I am interested > | in > | > > the > | > > > > AWD > | > > > > > > > version, and thought there might (probably) be some parasitic > | loss > | > > > > from > | > > > > > > > the AWD system. > | > > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > Either way, if anybody has some 0-60 or 1/4mile times and > | speeds, > | > > it > | > > > > would > | > > > > > > > be greatly appreciated. > | > > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > Thanks! > | > > > > > > > Wicked96SS > | > > > > > > | > > > > > Do you have any numbers to back that up? I did a little research, > | and > | > > the > | > > > > > Magnum as a higher rear end ratio, more power, more torque, and > | weighs > | > > > > > less... I woudl assume that even the AWD version would be > | considerably > | > > > > > faster than the Grand Cherokee... > | > > > > > > | > > > > > Grand Cherokee: > | > > > > > HP: 265 @ 5100 RPMs > | > > > > > TQ: 325 @ 3600 RPMs > | > > > > > WEIGHT: 5150 lbs. > | > > > > > > | > > > > > Dodge Magnum: > | > > > > > HP: 340 @ 5000 RPMs > | > > > > > TQ: 390 @ 4000 RPMs > | > > > > > WEIGHT: 4393 lbs. > | > > > > > > | > > > > > Just curious! > | > > > > > > | > > > > > Thanks! > | > > > > > > | > > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > > | > > > > | > > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > | > > | > > | > | > > |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
> > Well, I drove one yesterday. And, counting me, there were four people in it.
> > It felt good. I think my GC would give it some competetion up to about 50. > > Just out of curiosity, I asked them how much to trade. My GC is an '04 > > Limited with 3K miles on it, has all of the options except GPS and > > window-stickered for close to $39K. The RT had a window sticker of $33K > > even. Are you ready??! They'd "put me in it" for a mere $10K difference!!!! A lot of folks are diggin' the Magnum right now, cause of the HEmi I guess... I like the looks too, but wasn't aware so many folks like em that much. I wonder if waiting past the new year will help... Magnums are pretty smooth, I have driven one myself, nice... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
> > Well, I drove one yesterday. And, counting me, there were four people in it.
> > It felt good. I think my GC would give it some competetion up to about 50. > > Just out of curiosity, I asked them how much to trade. My GC is an '04 > > Limited with 3K miles on it, has all of the options except GPS and > > window-stickered for close to $39K. The RT had a window sticker of $33K > > even. Are you ready??! They'd "put me in it" for a mere $10K difference!!!! A lot of folks are diggin' the Magnum right now, cause of the HEmi I guess... I like the looks too, but wasn't aware so many folks like em that much. I wonder if waiting past the new year will help... Magnums are pretty smooth, I have driven one myself, nice... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Try the shiftronic
Jack Carter wrote: > I used to do a LOT of drag racing myself at local strips. One of the road > tests I recently read for the RT quoted a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds. (The > writer said it seemed "sluggish" coming off the line and that there were > times when it didn't feel like it had 340hp.) But I just got a Road & Track > that says 6.1. Don't know who to believe. I'm going to drive one this > afternoon so I'll have a better idea of how it might run after that. > > > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > ... > >>On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: >> >> >>>I don't know where you got your GC weight figure but it sounds far too > > high! > >>>I have an '04 GC with the HO V8 and have tested it several times with a >>>G-Tech Pro performance meter. It breaks seven seconds from 0-60 >>>consistently. The GC seems to have a very high RPM stall torque > > converter > >>>and, as a result, really flies off the line. I'm getting faster times > > from > >>>my '04 that the 5.7 liter 98 that I used to have. >> >>It may sound high, but I saw that figure on several websites, and Edmunds >>has the vehicle listed at 6100 pounds. >> >>As for sub 7 second 0-60, that is impressive for an SUV! But I have also >>read several >>instances whre 0-60's in the Dodge Magnum RT were 6.1 seconds, with a 14.6 >>second quarter mile. As a drag racer, to put it in perspective, at those >>times and speeds, .9 seconds difference (assuming that the Jeep could keep >>up) is about 9 car lengths, substancially faster. >> >>Again, I would really like to see some actual numbers, and not just >>guessing on what the AWD RT would do... I have a feeling it would be >>slightly faster than the Jeep.... although I don't have any facts to back >>this up. >> >>Thanks! >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>"Wicked96SS" > wrote in message ... >>> >>>>On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>From what I've read, anyone who owns an 04 Grand Cherokee with the > > HO V8 > >>>>>(AWD) probably won't take a back seat to an RT AWD in a 0-60 run. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Wicked96SS" > wrote in message ... >>>>> >>>>>>Does anybody know what the performance numbers are for the RT AWD? > > I > >>>have >>> >>>>>>found several sources for the RWD version, but I am interested in > > the > >>>AWD >>> >>>>>>version, and thought there might (probably) be some parasitic loss >>> >>>from >>> >>>>>>the AWD system. >>>>>> >>>>>>Either way, if anybody has some 0-60 or 1/4mile times and speeds, > > it > >>>would >>> >>>>>>be greatly appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks! >>>>>>Wicked96SS >>>> >>>>Do you have any numbers to back that up? I did a little research, and > > the > >>>>Magnum as a higher rear end ratio, more power, more torque, and weighs >>>>less... I woudl assume that even the AWD version would be considerably >>>>faster than the Grand Cherokee... >>>> >>>>Grand Cherokee: >>>>HP: 265 @ 5100 RPMs >>>>TQ: 325 @ 3600 RPMs >>>>WEIGHT: 5150 lbs. >>>> >>>>Dodge Magnum: >>>>HP: 340 @ 5000 RPMs >>>>TQ: 390 @ 4000 RPMs >>>>WEIGHT: 4393 lbs. >>>> >>>>Just curious! >>>> >>>>Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Try the shiftronic
Jack Carter wrote: > I used to do a LOT of drag racing myself at local strips. One of the road > tests I recently read for the RT quoted a 0-60 time of 7.1 seconds. (The > writer said it seemed "sluggish" coming off the line and that there were > times when it didn't feel like it had 340hp.) But I just got a Road & Track > that says 6.1. Don't know who to believe. I'm going to drive one this > afternoon so I'll have a better idea of how it might run after that. > > > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message > ... > >>On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: >> >> >>>I don't know where you got your GC weight figure but it sounds far too > > high! > >>>I have an '04 GC with the HO V8 and have tested it several times with a >>>G-Tech Pro performance meter. It breaks seven seconds from 0-60 >>>consistently. The GC seems to have a very high RPM stall torque > > converter > >>>and, as a result, really flies off the line. I'm getting faster times > > from > >>>my '04 that the 5.7 liter 98 that I used to have. >> >>It may sound high, but I saw that figure on several websites, and Edmunds >>has the vehicle listed at 6100 pounds. >> >>As for sub 7 second 0-60, that is impressive for an SUV! But I have also >>read several >>instances whre 0-60's in the Dodge Magnum RT were 6.1 seconds, with a 14.6 >>second quarter mile. As a drag racer, to put it in perspective, at those >>times and speeds, .9 seconds difference (assuming that the Jeep could keep >>up) is about 9 car lengths, substancially faster. >> >>Again, I would really like to see some actual numbers, and not just >>guessing on what the AWD RT would do... I have a feeling it would be >>slightly faster than the Jeep.... although I don't have any facts to back >>this up. >> >>Thanks! >> >> >> >>> >>> >>>"Wicked96SS" > wrote in message ... >>> >>>>On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>From what I've read, anyone who owns an 04 Grand Cherokee with the > > HO V8 > >>>>>(AWD) probably won't take a back seat to an RT AWD in a 0-60 run. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Wicked96SS" > wrote in message ... >>>>> >>>>>>Does anybody know what the performance numbers are for the RT AWD? > > I > >>>have >>> >>>>>>found several sources for the RWD version, but I am interested in > > the > >>>AWD >>> >>>>>>version, and thought there might (probably) be some parasitic loss >>> >>>from >>> >>>>>>the AWD system. >>>>>> >>>>>>Either way, if anybody has some 0-60 or 1/4mile times and speeds, > > it > >>>would >>> >>>>>>be greatly appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>>Thanks! >>>>>>Wicked96SS >>>> >>>>Do you have any numbers to back that up? I did a little research, and > > the > >>>>Magnum as a higher rear end ratio, more power, more torque, and weighs >>>>less... I woudl assume that even the AWD version would be considerably >>>>faster than the Grand Cherokee... >>>> >>>>Grand Cherokee: >>>>HP: 265 @ 5100 RPMs >>>>TQ: 325 @ 3600 RPMs >>>>WEIGHT: 5150 lbs. >>>> >>>>Dodge Magnum: >>>>HP: 340 @ 5000 RPMs >>>>TQ: 390 @ 4000 RPMs >>>>WEIGHT: 4393 lbs. >>>> >>>>Just curious! >>>> >>>>Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad Gas Mileage with 2005 330i BMW with Performance Package | Kent Lewis | BMW | 26 | December 10th 04 06:14 PM |
Dodge Magnum RT 2005 Real World Mileage | GRL | Dodge | 2 | September 24th 04 09:06 AM |
New dodge magnum 2005 | mollone | Dodge | 24 | July 26th 04 05:49 PM |