If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and
most rural areas. 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. Al Young |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
Alan Young wrote:
> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and > most rural areas. > 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go > off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in > the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of > vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. > Al Young > I beg to differ. We owned 2 4x4's and used them all the time on the street in 4x4. Both my wife and I got off our different shift jobs at times when the snowplows hadn't touched the roads yet, her at 12 AM and myself at 4 AM. I even got paid extra on one contract to bring my 4x4 so we were guaranteed we could get to the house and back in the ice and snow storms when frozen pipes usually happen. We also travel and have used it many many times in the snow on trips. From the countless cars we plodded on by that were in the snowbank or ditch, I would say the 4x4 was very useful. I do think a 4x4 would be useless for someone as yourself who thinks it is only for horsing around, folks like that go way too fast for the conditions and just end up in ditches off ramps. Or do you live someplace sunny and warm? Mike (Up in The Great White North) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
Alan Young wrote:
> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and > most rural areas. > 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go > off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in > the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of > vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. > Al Young > Actually, very careful research is behind this phenomenon. If everyone in the USofA buys a true 4x4, rumor is it that someone named Alan Young will scream himself to death after realizing nobody gives a rat. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
You raise a very good point. It is great sales tool for Detroit and has
helped put them in the pickle they are in today. It adds cost and weight to a SUV and also reduces MPG 5 to 10% too. Detriot has done a fine job over the years convincing public that they need 4wd when 99% of the time even a front wheel drive will get you through and with better stability and less quirks too. On 1/28/2009 7:58 PM, Alan Young wrote: > Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and > most rural areas. > 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go > off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in > the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of > vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. > Al Young > |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
"SnoMan" > wrote in message m... > You raise a very good point. It is great sales tool for Detroit and > has helped put them in the pickle they are in today. It adds cost > and weight to a SUV and also reduces MPG 5 to 10% too. Detriot has > done a fine job over the years convincing public that they need 4wd > when 99% of the time even a front wheel drive will get you through > and with better stability and less quirks too. Well I have a different perspective. I have a farm and use my truck on that farm. In the past, I used 2WD trucks, but not anymore. I got tired of either not using the truck to check fences during the winter (becasue of mud, not snow), or in taking a chance on a long walk home. Neither option is attractive. I don't see a 10% reduction in mileage. More like 5% or even less. For a 2009 F150, the 2WD 4.6L 6 speed 2WD and 4WD version are rated the same mpg by the EPA. My 2009 F150 4WD gets better mileage than my 1992 2WD F150. I also own an AWD Fusion. Even though this is an "on demand" type AWD system (as opposed to a full time system with a center differential), I still noticed a significant difference in the handling on some surfaces. I never have any wheel spin. The 2WD version I tested defintiely handled worse on wet roads. I have my favorite traction test - an uphill drive with a metal grate. The 2WD version spun the tires on the grate. The AWD version never does. According to the EPA, the AWD does significantly affect the fuel economy of a Fusion (almost 8%). However, I routinely exceed the EPA ratings. The combined EPA rating for a 2007 Fusion AWD is 19 mpg. My average fuel economy is 22 mpg. I've never done as poorly as the city ratig (17) and I routinely exceed the EPA highway rating (24) by 4 mpg despite routinely driving 70 mph (or more) on the highway. Now maybe the 2WD version would do even better, but I am satisfied. Ed > On 1/28/2009 7:58 PM, Alan Young wrote: >> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban >> and >> most rural areas. >> 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go >> off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps >> in >> the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type >> of >> vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows >> snow. >> Al Young >> > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
On 2/26/2009 9:59 AM, C. E. White wrote:
> > wrote in message > m... >> You raise a very good point. It is great sales tool for Detroit and >> has helped put them in the pickle they are in today. It adds cost >> and weight to a SUV and also reduces MPG 5 to 10% too. Detriot has >> done a fine job over the years convincing public that they need 4wd >> when 99% of the time even a front wheel drive will get you through >> and with better stability and less quirks too. > > Well I have a different perspective. I have a farm and use my truck on > that farm. In the past, I used 2WD trucks, but not anymore. I got > tired of either not using the truck to check fences during the winter > (becasue of mud, not snow), or in taking a chance on a long walk home. > Neither option is attractive. I don't see a 10% reduction in mileage. > More like 5% or even less. For a 2009 F150, the 2WD 4.6L 6 speed 2WD > and 4WD version are rated the same mpg by the EPA. My 2009 F150 4WD > gets better mileage than my 1992 2WD F150. > > I also own an AWD Fusion. Even though this is an "on demand" type AWD > system (as opposed to a full time system with a center differential), > I still noticed a significant difference in the handling on some > surfaces. I never have any wheel spin. The 2WD version I tested > defintiely handled worse on wet roads. I have my favorite traction > test - an uphill drive with a metal grate. The 2WD version spun the > tires on the grate. The AWD version never does. According to the EPA, > the AWD does significantly affect the fuel economy of a Fusion (almost > 8%). However, I routinely exceed the EPA ratings. The combined EPA > rating for a 2007 Fusion AWD is 19 mpg. My average fuel economy is 22 > mpg. I've never done as poorly as the city ratig (17) and I routinely > exceed the EPA highway rating (24) by 4 mpg despite routinely driving > 70 mph (or more) on the highway. Now maybe the 2WD version would do > even better, but I am satisfied. > > Ed > > > >> On 1/28/2009 7:58 PM, Alan Young wrote: >>> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban >>> and >>> most rural areas. >>> 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go >>> off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps >>> in >>> the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type >>> of >>> vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows >>> snow. >>> Al Young >>> > > Farm use is different than a daily commuters needs. ALso 4wd induces a fals sense of security and has stability issue and control issue once a skid starts in 4wd at speed. The only 4wd truely rated for speed on slick surfaces are old fulltime units that use a true differential between front and rear axles that prevent traction loss on slick surface due to torque bind for differences in rolling radius's due to tire loads and tracks in turns. I have seen MANY 4x4 SUV's in ditches over the years because of over confidence that 4wd would keep them safe and then when they start to skid they find they have next to no control to try to get out of it unless they act quickly and get it out of 4wd. I have owned 4x4's for over 35 years now and currently own 3 but the only one I ever "used" 4wd on at speed on slick surfaces is a old Jeep J20 P/U that has Quadratrac fulltime 4wd. It is superior to any conventional or clutch based autotrac 4wd system on slick roads. When roads are bad/slick I feel more secure in a good front wheel drive car or my 4x4 that has studs on all for wheels (and running in 2wd too) than in a 4x4 with conventional 4x4 drive and no studs. I have been plowing snow for over 25 years now and I know what works best on slick roads and what does not because I have pulled many of them out of the ditch over the years that had thought they were invincible with 4wd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
On 1/29/2009 9:19 AM, Mike Romain wrote:
> Alan Young wrote: >> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and >> most rural areas. >> 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go >> off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in >> the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of >> vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. >> Al Young >> > > I beg to differ. We owned 2 4x4's and used them all the time on the > street in 4x4. Both my wife and I got off our different shift jobs at > times when the snowplows hadn't touched the roads yet, her at 12 AM and > myself at 4 AM. > > I even got paid extra on one contract to bring my 4x4 so we were > guaranteed we could get to the house and back in the ice and snow storms > when frozen pipes usually happen. > > We also travel and have used it many many times in the snow on trips. > From the countless cars we plodded on by that were in the snowbank or > ditch, I would say the 4x4 was very useful. > > I do think a 4x4 would be useless for someone as yourself who thinks it > is only for horsing around, folks like that go way too fast for the > conditions and just end up in ditches off ramps. Or do you live > someplace sunny and warm? > > Mike (Up in The Great White North) Watch this guys advise! He is the same guy that used to brag a few years ago about 33 inch tires on his Jeep with 3.31 axle ratios and what a GREAT combo it was and that it was totally acceptable to loose most usage of 5th gear and lug motor and have reduced performance too. He is a legend in his own mind. While some do offer good advise, his is purely ego driven and not one to bet your safety on. I am glad he does not live around me so I do not have to worry about meeting him going sideways down the road at me in my lane on a slick road because his ego over stepped reality. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
SnoMan wrote:
> > Watch this guys advise! I see my not so favorite psychotic Usenet stalker is loose again. They just let you out of jail?, been a while at least.... Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
In article > ,
SnoMan > wrote: > On 1/29/2009 9:19 AM, Mike Romain wrote: > > Alan Young wrote: > >> Always made me wonder why SUV 4x4's sold at all in suburban, urban and > >> most rural areas. > >> 4-wheel-drive is not needed, generally unless one intends to go > >> off-road. And where can one go off-road in a suburban town? Perhaps in > >> the town park? Or maybe a neighborhood golf course? No, this type of > >> vehicle is useless to the average person. Unless he (she) plows snow. > >> Al Young > >> > > > > I beg to differ. We owned 2 4x4's and used them all the time on the > > street in 4x4. Both my wife and I got off our different shift jobs at > > times when the snowplows hadn't touched the roads yet, her at 12 AM and > > myself at 4 AM. > > > > I even got paid extra on one contract to bring my 4x4 so we were > > guaranteed we could get to the house and back in the ice and snow storms > > when frozen pipes usually happen. > > > > We also travel and have used it many many times in the snow on trips. > > From the countless cars we plodded on by that were in the snowbank or > > ditch, I would say the 4x4 was very useful. > > > > I do think a 4x4 would be useless for someone as yourself who thinks it > > is only for horsing around, folks like that go way too fast for the > > conditions and just end up in ditches off ramps. Or do you live > > someplace sunny and warm? > > > > Mike (Up in The Great White North) > > > Watch this guys advise! He is the same guy that used to brag a few years > ago about 33 inch tires on his Jeep with 3.31 axle ratios and what a > GREAT combo it was and that it was totally acceptable to loose most > usage of 5th gear and lug motor and have reduced performance too. He is > a legend in his own mind. While some do offer good advise, his is purely > ego driven and not one to bet your safety on. I am glad he does not live > around me so I do not have to worry about meeting him going sideways > down the road at me in my lane on a slick road because his ego over > stepped reality. Get your meds adjusted Jacob. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
4x4 usefulness
On Feb 25, 11:01*am, SnoMan > wrote:
> You raise a very good point. It is great sales tool for Detroit and has > helped put them in the pickle they are in today. It adds cost and weight > to a SUV and also reduces MPG 5 to 10% too. ******** Detriot ******** has done a fine job > over the years convincing public that they need 4wd when 99% of the time > even a front wheel drive will get you through and with better stability > and less quirks too. Finally, the 'room full of monkeys at typewriters' approach has paid off. Thank you for the hilarious typo. Detriot is such an obvious and appropriate nickname I can't believe I never thought of it! Toyota MDT in MO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|