V vs H Rated Michellin's

"Tom Wallace" > wrote in message
. net...
>I ran in to this about 4 years ago and I tried 3 different Costco's and
>each would not sell me the tires. I was able to buy lower speed ratings at
>Wal-Mart.
> "Dick" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:52:02 -0800, "M.Paul"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Dick" > wrote in message
...
>>>> It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. I know people on
>>>> this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
>>>> MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. Good snow and wet
>>>> pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. That's good enough for
>>>> me. I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
>>>> tires is not an option for me.
>>>>
>>>> I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. It's
>>>> supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
>>>> Michellin tire. There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
>>>> the H ratings in the Primacy. Is there any real reason to spend the
>>>> extra $120 to get the V rating again? I do spend some time on the
>>>> road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. I don't know why Honda uses the V
>>>> rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>>>>
>>>> Dick
>>>
>>>The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my
>>>'99
>>>Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
>>>policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. YMMV.
>>>M.Paul
>>>
>>
>> Good point. I will see what ours has to say about that. May be a
>> corporate issue.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>>
>
>

I like Costco a lot, but their tire policies can be a little bit tyrannical,
all in the name of eliminating liability. So we reap what we sue, I
suppose. (Wordplay intentional, to the grammar police.)

mg



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Dick" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:52:02 -0800, "M.Paul"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Dick" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. I know people on
>>> this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
>>> MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. Good snow and wet
>>> pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. That's good enough for
>>> me. I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
>>> tires is not an option for me.
>>>
>>> I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. It's
>>> supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
>>> Michellin tire. There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
>>> the H ratings in the Primacy. Is there any real reason to spend the
>>> extra $120 to get the V rating again? I do spend some time on the
>>> road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. I don't know why Honda uses the V
>>> rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>>>
>>> Dick
>>
>>The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my
>>'99
>>Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
>>policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. YMMV.
>>M.Paul
>>
>
> Good point. I will see what ours has to say about that. May be a
> corporate issue.
>
> Dick
>

I've seen those notices at Costco too. I bought some Goodrich Traction T/As
for my '01 Odyssey at Costco a few years ago and I've been happy with them.
I think they sell them in a size to fit the Accord; not sure about the speed
rating. Might be worth a look. They'd cost you less than the Michelins.

Paul

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:46:51 GMT, "Paul" >
wrote:


>>>The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my
>>>'99
>>>Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
>>>policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. YMMV.
>>>M.Paul
>>>
>>
>> Good point. I will see what ours has to say about that. May be a
>> corporate issue.
>>
>> Dick
>>
>
>I've seen those notices at Costco too. I bought some Goodrich Traction T/As
>for my '01 Odyssey at Costco a few years ago and I've been happy with them.
>I think they sell them in a size to fit the Accord; not sure about the speed
>rating. Might be worth a look. They'd cost you less than the Michelins.
>
>Paul
>

I asked about the policy at my local Costco. Was told that all I had
to do was sign a waiver. They do it all the time. Decided to trust
Honda's decision to use 92V tires.

Thanks everyone for your ideas and comments.

Dick


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Jan 25, 11:03 pm, Dick > wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:46:51 GMT, "Paul" >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >>>The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my
> >>>'99
> >>>Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
> >>>policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. YMMV.
> >>>M.Paul
>
> >> Good point. I will see what ours has to say about that. May be a
> >> corporate issue.
>
> >> Dick
>
> >I've seen those notices at Costco too. I bought some Goodrich Traction T/As
> >for my '01 Odyssey at Costco a few years ago and I've been happy with them.
> >I think they sell them in a size to fit the Accord; not sure about the speed
> >rating. Might be worth a look. They'd cost you less than the Michelins.
>
> >Paul
>
> I asked about the policy at my local Costco. Was told that all I had
> to do was sign a waiver. They do it all the time. Decided to trust
> Honda's decision to use 92V tires.
>
> Thanks everyone for your ideas and comments.
>
> Dick

Just be very careful when driving over 150mph <G>

Ron wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:03 pm, Dick > wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:46:51 GMT, "Paul" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my
>>>>> '99
>>>>> Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
>>>>> policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. YMMV.
>>>>> M.Paul
>>>> Good point. I will see what ours has to say about that. May be a
>>>> corporate issue.
>>>> Dick
>>> I've seen those notices at Costco too. I bought some Goodrich Traction T/As
>>> for my '01 Odyssey at Costco a few years ago and I've been happy with them.
>>> I think they sell them in a size to fit the Accord; not sure about the speed
>>> rating. Might be worth a look. They'd cost you less than the Michelins.
>>> Paul
>> I asked about the policy at my local Costco. Was told that all I had
>> to do was sign a waiver. They do it all the time. Decided to trust
>> Honda's decision to use 92V tires.
>>
>> Thanks everyone for your ideas and comments.
>>
>> Dick
>
> Just be very careful when driving over 150mph <G>

Good advice in general.

On Jan 24, 12:53*am, Gordon McGrew >
wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:16:43 -0800, jim beam
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >Dick wrote:
> >> It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. *I know people on
> >> this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
> >> MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. *Good snow and wet
> >> pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. *That's good enough for
> >> me. *I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
> >> tires is not an option for me.
>
> >> I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. *It's
> >> supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
> >> Michellin tire. *There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
> >> the H ratings in the Primacy. *Is there any real reason to spend the
> >> extra $120 to get the V rating again? *I do spend some time on the
> >> road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. *I don't know why Honda uses the V
> >> rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>
> >the energy is not a performance tire - it's a high mileage low rolling
> >resistance tire. *you're not going to gain anything paying to replicate
> >their "speed" rating.
>
> I often wonder about the differences (if any) when a tire model comes
> in different speed ratings. *The rating refers only to the tire's
> resistance to coming apart at high speed. *This attribute doesn't
> guaranty that the tire handles well. *Of course, high performance
> tires tend to come with higher speed ratings than Costco all season
> radials. *But is there any inherent correlation between speed rating
> and handling, especially when you can get nominally the same tire in
> different ratings?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

not inherently, but marketing logic suggests that in general, the
folks who want the highspeed rating are also going to want stiffer
sidewalls for tighter handling.

On Jan 24, 9:52*am, "M.Paul" > wrote:
> "Dick" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. *I know people on
> > this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
> > MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. *Good snow and wet
> > pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. *That's good enough for
> > me. *I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
> > tires is not an option for me.
>
> > I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. *It's
> > supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
> > Michellin tire. *There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
> > the H ratings in the Primacy. *Is there any real reason to spend the
> > extra $120 to get the V rating again? *I do spend some time on the
> > road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. *I don't know why Honda uses the V
> > rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>
> > Dick
>
> The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my '99
> Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
> policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. *YMMV.
> M.Paul- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

yeah, but the car's probably got a speed limiter in the engine
computer that's probably less than 120

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:35:20 -0800 (PST), z >
wrote:

>On Jan 24, 9:52*am, "M.Paul" > wrote:
>> "Dick" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. *I know people on
>> > this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
>> > MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. *Good snow and wet
>> > pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. *That's good enough for
>> > me. *I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
>> > tires is not an option for me.
>>
>> > I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. *It's
>> > supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
>> > Michellin tire. *There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
>> > the H ratings in the Primacy. *Is there any real reason to spend the
>> > extra $120 to get the V rating again? *I do spend some time on the
>> > road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. *I don't know why Honda uses the V
>> > rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>>
>> > Dick
>>
>> The tire folks at my local Costco stated that since the door label on my '99
>> Accord V6 recommends V rated tires, due to liability issues it is their
>> policy to not install tires with a lesser speed rating. *YMMV.
>> M.Paul- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>yeah, but the car's probably got a speed limiter in the engine
>computer that's probably less than 120

130

<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=2003+Accord+V6+%22top+speed%22&btnG =Google+Search>

"jim beam" > wrote in message
t...
> Gordon McGrew wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:16:43 -0800, jim beam
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Dick wrote:
>>>> It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. I know people on
>>>> this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
>>>> MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. Good snow and wet
>>>> pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. That's good enough for
>>>> me. I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
>>>> tires is not an option for me.
>>>>
>>>> I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. It's
>>>> supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
>>>> Michellin tire. There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
>>>> the H ratings in the Primacy. Is there any real reason to spend the
>>>> extra $120 to get the V rating again? I do spend some time on the
>>>> road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. I don't know why Honda uses the V
>>>> rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>>>>
>>> the energy is not a performance tire - it's a high mileage low rolling
>>> resistance tire. you're not going to gain anything paying to replicate
>>> their "speed" rating.
>>
>> I often wonder about the differences (if any) when a tire model comes
>> in different speed ratings. The rating refers only to the tire's
>> resistance to coming apart at high speed. This attribute doesn't
>> guaranty that the tire handles well. Of course, high performance
>> tires tend to come with higher speed ratings than Costco all season
>> radials. But is there any inherent correlation between speed rating
>> and handling, especially when you can get nominally the same tire in
>> different ratings?
>
> no correlation that i know of. it's the construction of the tire and the
> ability of the rubber to dissipate accumulated heat that give it the speed
> rating. neither assure handling or traction.

The speed rating is the maximum the tire is rated to be safely driven at,
and there is a separate temperature rating rating the tire's ability to
handle the buildup of heat and how well it dissipates heat. There is a
rating of A, B and C. Of course, everything is woven together.

Some of the ratings for tires are the speed rating, temperature rating and
traction rating. Speed rating is generally what speed this tire is rated to
safely travel at, and generally doesn't relate to the top speed or speed of
the car.

Traction rating is on a scale of AA, A, B and C and is based on the tire's
ability to stop on a wet, straight line surface such as asphalt or concrete.

Temperature I described above. The higher the speed rating, normally the
softer the rubber, lower aspect ratio (the 2nd number - example, 235/40-18).
That's 235mm for the width, 40 is the sidewall (40% of 235) and 18 is the
wheel diameter in inches. 40 is a low profile tire so when cornering there
is less flex. Less flex can mean better handling. Of course, a low profile
tire like this is normally on a sportier car so the speed rating is often
higher. A higher speed rating often affords a softer rubber for better
handling but you sacrifice tire longevity. You may also find more high
performance tires not rated as all season, so it's almost useless in the
snow/ice. Rubber compound and the tread pattern/sipes will make a
difference for traction, cornering, stopping in the wet, rolling resistance,
etc. The high performance tires with the high speed ratings are normally a
softer rubber with a shorter tread life.

Now - about the V and H rating on the Michelin. It doesn't matter if it's V
and H on a Michelin, Bridgestone, Goodyear, Firestone, Kuhmo, Cooper, BF
Goodrich, Dunlop, etc. The UTQG governs the rates for all brands. Is there
a difference between V and H? Yes. The V is a higher performance tire, and
therefore put on the higher trim level car such as an Accord EX V6 whereas
and Accord I4 would have the H rated tire.

Why some places may refuse to "downgrade" a tire? Liability and safety. If
you downgrade, you may be sacrificing what the car was designed for so your
handling (such as emergency handling) may go down. Let's say there's a
Porche that can top out around 140mph, but Dad decided to save $$ and change
the tires/wheels to a downgraded "S" rated tire. Little Johnny decides to
take the car out for a joy ride (like he's done in the past) in his dad's
Porche at 120mph and wipes out. Yes he's driving illegally but it's also
riding on below spec tires. Who gets the blame - the driver, the owner who
authorized this, or the shop who downgraded the tires? Did the shop advise
the owner this may affect the handling and driving characteristics?

A great resource for tire specs, definitions, and reviews is
www.tirerack.com. Of course you can do a google search too for the
different speed, traction, temperature and wear ratings.

There's much more information out there. Major differences in tires, even
within the same brand.

-Dave

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:34:05 -0800 (PST), z >
wrote:

>On Jan 24, 12:53*am, Gordon McGrew >
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:16:43 -0800, jim beam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >Dick wrote:
>> >> It's time for some new shoes for my '03 Accord V-6. *I know people on
>> >> this usenet group are not all that fond of the OEM Michellin Energy
>> >> MVX4 91V tires, but I have been happy with them. *Good snow and wet
>> >> pavement performance, quiet and good mileage. *That's good enough for
>> >> me. *I buy my tires at Costco, so straying away from the mainstream in
>> >> tires is not an option for me.
>>
>> >> I see that the Energy tire has been replaced with the Primacy. *It's
>> >> supposed to be a blend between the old Energy and another higher-end
>> >> Michellin tire. *There is a $30 per tire difference between the V and
>> >> the H ratings in the Primacy. *Is there any real reason to spend the
>> >> extra $120 to get the V rating again? *I do spend some time on the
>> >> road, so 80 mph is not uncommon. *I don't know why Honda uses the V
>> >> rating in the first place, unless it is just a marketing tool.
>>
>> >the energy is not a performance tire - it's a high mileage low rolling
>> >resistance tire. *you're not going to gain anything paying to replicate
>> >their "speed" rating.
>>
>> I often wonder about the differences (if any) when a tire model comes
>> in different speed ratings. *The rating refers only to the tire's
>> resistance to coming apart at high speed. *This attribute doesn't
>> guaranty that the tire handles well. *Of course, high performance
>> tires tend to come with higher speed ratings than Costco all season
>> radials. *But is there any inherent correlation between speed rating
>> and handling, especially when you can get nominally the same tire in
>> different ratings?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>not inherently, but marketing logic suggests that in general, the
>folks who want the highspeed rating are also going to want stiffer
>sidewalls for tighter handling.

I know what they want, but I am not sure that they get it just by
buying a V-rated tire. Especially when they get it at Costco and it
has the same model designation as an H-rated tire.

That is one thing I don't like about buying tires. You don't know how
they will handle until they are installed on the car.