chip for 2005 300C Hemi?

A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.

If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ritz wrote:

> A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
> paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
> if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi. If anyone has a lead on
> non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned chips for this
> car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

Yeah, because the 300C Hemi is *so* lacking in performance from the
factory.

> Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
> were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

Your buddy is an idiot in need of a clue.

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ritz wrote:

> A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
> paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
> if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi. If anyone has a lead on
> non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned chips for this
> car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.

Yeah, because the 300C Hemi is *so* lacking in performance from the
factory.

> Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
> were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

Your buddy is an idiot in need of a clue.

Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ritz wrote:
>
>
>>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
>>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
>>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi. If anyone has a lead on
>>non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned chips for this
>>car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>
>
> Yeah, because the 300C Hemi is *so* lacking in performance from the
> factory.
>
>
>>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
>>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
>
>
> Your buddy is an idiot in need of a clue.


Thanks for the completely unhelpful response. A simple "no" would have
sufficed.

C

Daniel J. Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Ritz wrote:
>
>
>>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
>>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
>>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi. If anyone has a lead on
>>non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned chips for this
>>car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>
>
> Yeah, because the 300C Hemi is *so* lacking in performance from the
> factory.
>
>
>>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
>>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
>
>
> Your buddy is an idiot in need of a clue.


Thanks for the completely unhelpful response. A simple "no" would have
sufficed.

C

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:

> A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
> paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
> if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
>
> If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
> chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>
> Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
> were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
lawn mowers.

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:

> A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
> paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
> if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
>
> If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
> chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>
> Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
> were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.

What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
lawn mowers.

General Schvantzkoph wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:
>
>
>>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
>>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
>>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
>>
>>If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
>>chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>>
>>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
>>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
>
>
> What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
> carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
> lawn mowers.

Actually, no. The term applies to engines that don't use forced
induction (turbo or supercharging).

Wow, 2 completely non-helpful responses. I'm on a roll.

Cheers,

C

General Schvantzkoph wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:
>
>
>>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
>>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
>>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
>>
>>If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
>>chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
>>
>>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
>>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
>
>
> What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
> carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
> lawn mowers.

Actually, no. The term applies to engines that don't use forced
induction (turbo or supercharging).

Wow, 2 completely non-helpful responses. I'm on a roll.

Cheers,

C

"Ritz" > wrote in message
news | General Schvantzkoph wrote:
| > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:18:31 +0000, Ritz wrote:
| >
| >
| >>A friend of mine was just given (yes, GIVEN) a new 300C Hemi. I haven't
| >>paid much attention to Chrysler since I sold my 300M, but he's asked me
| >>if anyone produces a "chip" for the '05 hemi.
| >>
| >>If anyone has a lead on non-vaporware companies with performance-tuned
| >>chips for this car/engine, I'd appreciate hearing from you.
| >>
| >>Personally, for normally aspirated engines, I always thought that chips
| >>were rather useless, but my buddy insists that he wants to do this.
| >
| >
| > What do you mean by normally aspirated? The term usually applies to a
| > carburated engine, nobody makes a carburated engine anymore except for
| > lawn mowers.
|
| Actually, no. The term applies to engines that don't use forced
| induction (turbo or supercharging).
|
| Wow, 2 completely non-helpful responses. I'm on a roll.
|
| Cheers,
|
| C

My recommendation is to leave the car as it is. It's performance is top notch
already and why mess with voiding the manufacturers warranty by doing
unnecessary modifications?