Guy that torched Hummers gets 8 years in prison

Around 4/18/2005 9:16 PM, Aunt Judy (Pride of Diarrhea)
<http://tinyurl.com/65nqz> wrote:

> L Sternn wrote:
>
>>Blame the OP, who crossposted this bitch to:
>>
>> alt.nuke.the.usa,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.r ush-limbaugh,misc.transport.road,rec.autos.driving
>
> So what's the problem.? This is a general interest thread

It's a zero interest thread.

> and belongs in any car or political NG.

Definitely belongs in a political newsgroup, *maybe* in a Hummer
newsgroup, but certainly not in a driving newsgroup.


(Hey, at least we've trained you not to call a newsgroup a "board." Who
says you can't teach an old troll new tricks, eh Judy?)
--
~/Garth
"I am patient with stupidity
but not with those who are proud of it." - Edith Sitwell
(Mail for secure contact information)

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 05:47:07 -0400, "Magnulus"
> wrote:

>
>"L Sternn" > wrote in message
.. .
>> Oh, boo-****ing-hoo for Martha. If you can't do the time don't do
>> the crime. And now she's whining about her house arrest interfering
>> in her ability to run her business. She can telecommute from her
>> estate which is a helluva lot more freedom than most people under
>> house arrest could ever hope for.
>
> Martha didn't do anything wrong, except having made the mistake of being
>successful.

Oh? She was busted for being "successful"?

I don't think you understand how things work.

> Isn't that what Republicans want? Oh wait, she chose the wrong
>political party, and Republicans know all about getting even with
>underhanded tactics (remember Watergate and Tricky Dick, remember Monica?).

You say that as if Democrats don't do the same ****.

>Really, the government couldn't peg her for insider trading, so they bring
>up some bogus crap about perjory, when really it was entrapment.
>

How could it be entrapment when all she had to do was tell the truth?

Do you understand that investor confidence is crucial to our economy?

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 05:44:29 -0400, "Magnulus"
> wrote:

>
>"L Sternn" > wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> Arson will still be considered wrong 100 years from now
>
> Maybe Arson is not cool, but I could care less about the Hummers being
>burned and the property destroyed. I guess I should say arson of Hummer's
>is wrong, if only for the reason that somebody could have been hurt.
>

Wow, dude. Do you have a problem with property rights?

How would you feel if your car were torched because someone didn't
like what you drive?

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:19:19 GMT, " Ford Prefect"
> wrote:

>
>"william lynch" > wrote in message
om...
>> Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>As for the issue of Congress and Clinton's, er, "situation", it's my
>> >>point we should not have had a President in the Whitehouse that would
>> >>have put his sexual satisfaction above the issues of the people.
>> >>Regardless of the appropriateness of the impeachment proceedings, a
>> >>President who was worth a damned would not have placed our nation in
>> >>that position.
>> >
>> > Hey stupid. The monica scandal was clinton's idea to keep america from
>> > talking about the really horrible stuff he did like Waco and OKC and
>> > the bombing and sanctions of iraq which even madeliene albright
>> > admitted killed 500,000 iraqi children!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> >
>> Clinton did Oklahoma City. OK . . .
>>
>> <plonk>
>
>What NG are you posting this in, Will?
>I'm on the Limbaugh NG. I come over here every now and then to remind the
>neocons that Rush is a drug-addict and a narc, just in case they forgot. You
>know them and memory problems. ;-)
>

Don't judge Limbaugh for being a "drug-addict".

Criticize him for being a hypocrite.