Best 4x4 in your opinion...??

Explain your reasoning!! Thx

Whichever model puts the biggest smile on Your face..

:-D

Carl


"Trader4Lessdotcom" > wrote in message
lkaboutautos.com...
> Explain your reasoning!! Thx
>

>
>Whichever model puts the biggest smile on Your face..
>
>:-D
>
>Carl

Totally depends on what you're looking for in a vehicle. For me, it has to be
the Jeep Rubicon for a stock rig from the factory. If you need a truck, well
then it's going to be the new version of the Dodge Powerwagon. To bad it does
not come with the Cummins diesel though

Cliff

I would have to say the Honda Rubicon (4x4). But I would prefer the
amphibious Maxx 6x6. It will go places a Jeep, Land Rover, Bronco, and etc
cant go. Even the Honda Rubicon will go places the ones above cant. But the
others can travel on the highway without being stopped by the cops

"Carl Saiyed" > wrote in message
...
> Whichever model puts the biggest smile on Your face..
>
> :-D
>
> Carl
>
>
> "Trader4Lessdotcom" > wrote in message
> lkaboutautos.com...
> > Explain your reasoning!! Thx
> >
>
>

Trader4Lessdotcom wrote:
>
> Explain your reasoning!! Thx


I am not going to explain this but,
Toyota Landcruiser!!!. The best looking will be a Series or Defender
Land Rover though.
I do not own one. So that is not the reason I mention it.
Mine is a http://www.fotograaf.com/trooper
Kind regards,
Erik-Jan.

I would say the Ford Bronco would be the best four wheel drives.Why I
wont go there but it is simply the best.

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:01:02 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> wrote:

>
>
>Trader4Lessdotcom wrote:
>>
>> Explain your reasoning!! Thx
>
>
>I am not going to explain this but,
>Toyota Landcruiser!!!.

Definitely - unless you want a very basic, uncomfortable vehicle like
the Land Rover Defender, which has more off-road ability.

--

R
o
o
n
e
y

Rooney wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:01:02 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Trader4Lessdotcom wrote:
> >>
> >> Explain your reasoning!! Thx
> >
> >
> >I am not going to explain this but,
> >Toyota Landcruiser!!!.
>
> Definitely - unless you want a very basic, uncomfortable vehicle like
> the Land Rover Defender, which has more off-road ability.

More off-road capabilty....why ???
Erik-Jan.

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:43:14 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
> wrote:

>
>
>Rooney wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:01:02 +0100, Erik-Jan Geniets
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Trader4Lessdotcom wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Explain your reasoning!! Thx
>> >
>> >
>> >I am not going to explain this but,
>> >Toyota Landcruiser!!!.
>>
>> Definitely - unless you want a very basic, uncomfortable vehicle like
>> the Land Rover Defender, which has more off-road ability.
>
>More off-road capabilty....why ???
>Erik-Jan.

Defender:
Ground clearance (mm) 215 215 215
Approach angle (degrees) 50 51 50
Departure angle (degrees) 34 53 34

Land Cruiser:
Ground clearance (mm) 215 215 215
Approach angle (degrees) 34 34 34
Departure angle (degrees) 26 26 26


--

R
o
o
n
e
y

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:50:19 +0000, Rooney > wrote:


>Defender:
>Ground clearance (mm) 215 215 215
>Approach angle (degrees) 50 51 50
>Departure angle (degrees) 34 53 34
>
>Land Cruiser:
>Ground clearance (mm) 215 215 215
>Approach angle (degrees) 34 34 34
>Departure angle (degrees) 26 26 26

Forgot to say - they refer to three different models of each.
4x4 Magazine's offroad test gave the Defender 10 out of a possible 10
and the Land Cruiser a highly respectable 7.

--

R
o
o
n
e
y