If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
iDrive?
Who has iDrive in their BMW? I have been looking at the very recent articles
on the new 3 Series in various British motoring magazines, and they almost all look negatively on it. Why is this, is it just because it is 'fiddly' to use, or what? All thoughts appreciated. tim |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"tim" > wrote in message ... > Who has iDrive in their BMW? I have been looking at the very recent > articles on the new 3 Series in various British motoring magazines, and > they almost all look negatively on it. Why is this, is it just because it > is 'fiddly' to use, or what? > I suggest you go down to your nearest BMW dealership and test drive a 5 or 7 series. Both of those cars come with idrive and you should be able to decide whether its complex or not. The idrive in the 5 series is supposedly alot more "user-friendly" than the 7 series' version. Try it out and see. Some find it easy to use, most don't. Btw, for the 3 series, idrive is suppose to be an "option", especially if you want NAV. Personally, I find BMW's NAV to be inferior to the Japanese mfrs and wouldn't get it. But that's a personal choice.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
bfd wrote:
> "tim" > wrote in message > ... >> Who has iDrive in their BMW? I have been looking at the very recent >> articles on the new 3 Series in various British motoring magazines, >> and they almost all look negatively on it. Why is this, is it just >> because it is 'fiddly' to use, or what? >> > I suggest you go down to your nearest BMW dealership and test drive a > 5 or 7 series. Both of those cars come with idrive and you should be > able to decide whether its complex or not. The idrive in the 5 series > is supposedly alot more "user-friendly" than the 7 series' version. > Try it out and see. Some find it easy to use, most don't. > > Btw, for the 3 series, idrive is suppose to be an "option", > especially if you want NAV. Personally, I find BMW's NAV to be > inferior to the Japanese mfrs and wouldn't get it. But that's a > personal choice.... IMO the best is the one in the Mini! It has fewer features, but the problem with these things is often too many features. Strip it down just enough, and the user interface can be so much more elegant. This one's a winner. The regular iDrive is as mediocre as a typical aftermarket stereo -- not horrible, but not particularly good, either. Matt O. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"tim" > wrote in message ... > Who has iDrive in their BMW? I have been looking at the very recent > articles on the new 3 Series in various British motoring magazines, and > they almost all look negatively on it. Why is this, is it just because it > is 'fiddly' to use, or what? I have i-drive in my 545. You are right, most of the magazines don't like it. That said, I can see why some would not like it. It is not the most efficient setup because at times it makes you run thru a number of menus to get to where you want to be. Myself, I find that a lot less distracting than having to look down, and find, and then push any number of times the multitude of buttons and rocker switches my previous E39's had. In fact i find the screen for I-drive...which is high on the dash...better located for the driver than having to look down to find buttons. With i-drive you still have the same steering wheel controls you had before and with I-drive you hand naturally falls on the console control knob and you don't have to lean over to reach buttons, knobs or dials on the dash. One of two compaints I ever had about my e39's was "what idiot decided 40 some buttons was the way to control the radio, HVAC and vehicle functions". The only complaint I have about my E60 is "what idiot decided you have to visit 3 menus before changing the radio station". I actually don't see the difference between the two complaints. Bottom line: I just don't think BMW does ergonomics particularly well if it has nothing to do with driving. They never really have. Both the current I-drive and the button orgy of previous cars (The non-I-drive 3 series will have the button orgy) are substandard. That's just a fact....why nobody ever complained before is simply a matter that they got used to pushing a button 8 times to get the fan speed increased etc. Here's what I recommend: if you have any intention of getting Sat radio...then get I-drive. It is the best Sat radio interface I have ever seen. If you have no intention of getting Sat radio then the basic dash is equally functional...though no easier to use (by the way is I-drive a "pay for option" on the new 3?). Really, in terms of functionality one is not better than the other. Of course if you want NAV then you have to get i-drive. The other thing I recommend is taking a good hard look at Active Steering (if that is going to be an option on the new 3). I don't like it and so bought a 545 without it. Don't let a salesperson talk you into it. Get out on the road, toss the car around, and see what you think. To me, it is the thing **everyone** should be bitching about, rather than I-drive and exterior design. It's not a good option and it is way too bad that you get it on a E60 Sport model by default. It is the most "un-BMW" thing they offer. It's no surprise to me they didn't include it in the new M5. The new 5 series is a better car than the E39 and I have little doubt the new 3 will surpass the e46 as well. BMW has to make them drive right if they are going to make substantial changes in the design and ergonomics. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the post.
>(by the way is I-drive a "pay for option" on the new 3?). Not sure as yet as few details are available, but for sure it'll be an 'extra' on some models if not all. > Of course if you want NAV then you have to get i-drive. Sure don't 'need' it, but I like gadgets so if it isn't stupidly priced as an option then I'll certainly consider it ) > The other thing I recommend is taking a good hard look at Active Steering > (if that is going to be an option on the new 3). It will be yes. Again I think the magazines are not keen on it, but it wouldn't be something I would waste money on anyway (not if I'm gonna waste money on i-drive!!) Well I have to wait until the E90 coupe is released which doesn't look like it will be before early/mid 2006 in the UK. Time to save up, although I'm not convinced of the 'look' of the car, so that may stop me from buying one (but probably not!!) cheers tim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:20:15 -0800, "bfd" > wrote:
> >"tim" > wrote in message ... >> Who has iDrive in their BMW? I have been looking at the very recent >> articles on the new 3 Series in various British motoring magazines, and >> they almost all look negatively on it. Why is this, is it just because it >> is 'fiddly' to use, or what? >> >I suggest you go down to your nearest BMW dealership and test drive a 5 or 7 >series. Both of those cars come with idrive and you should be able to decide >whether its complex or not. The idrive in the 5 series is supposedly alot >more "user-friendly" than the 7 series' version. Try it out and see. Some >find it easy to use, most don't. > >Btw, for the 3 series, idrive is suppose to be an "option", especially if >you want NAV. Personally, I find BMW's NAV to be inferior to the Japanese >mfrs and wouldn't get it. But that's a personal choice.... > I tried the 7 series I-Drive demo. It was a wonderful example of technology being used to sex up the car... unfortunately it was difficult to use without training. After 15 minutes I realized it made what I wanted to do more difficult without sufficient compensation. If it had supplied a simulation of analog systems as one of it's skins, I would have put up with it. But it didn't have such options. I thought it a vintage 1990 user interface... ie as crude as Windows 3.1 Heard on the net: My I-Drive crashed and so did I. BTW... notice that Lexus with it's Bluetooth interface is now subject to worms? Drive within 15 feet of an infected Lexus and your Lexus becomes infected! Adds a new dimension to 'where do you want to go today' ... where ever the hacker wants you to go! '-) Fortunately the I-Drive only simulates console systems and hopefully isn't linked to engine or braking control systems... But non-computer people are so naive they might start doing that. Germans and Japanese may be wonderful mechanical engineers but they generally have crap for native computing systems. (I'll have 3 Nexdorfs and a Seimens to go. '-) And if they use US systems, they tend to use Windoze, oh fools that they are. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"tim" > wrote in message ... > Thanks for the post. > >>(by the way is I-drive a "pay for option" on the new 3?). > > Not sure as yet as few details are available, but for sure it'll be an > 'extra' on some models if not all. > >> Of course if you want NAV then you have to get i-drive. > > Sure don't 'need' it, but I like gadgets so if it isn't stupidly priced as > an option then I'll certainly consider it ) > >> The other thing I recommend is taking a good hard look at Active Steering >> (if that is going to be an option on the new 3). > > It will be yes. Again I think the magazines are not keen on it, but it > wouldn't be something I would waste money on anyway (not if I'm gonna > waste money on i-drive!!) Be careful how much stock you put into magazine comments about current and future BMW's. I have not seen a run a stupidly put opinions and ridiculously inaccurate comments about content and functionality, as I have with recent BMWs. I dislike AS as well, but for reasons that differ from most magazines. On the other hand I know people who really like it and wouldn't do without it. I only meant to tell you to "really *test drive* it" before deciding. > Well I have to wait until the E90 coupe is released which doesn't look > like it will be before early/mid 2006 in the UK. Time to save up, although > I'm not convinced of the 'look' of the car, so that may stop me from > buying one (but probably not!!) > cheers > tim I've only seen the pictures but I have never thought the 3 series was a particularly good looking car anyway. I've always been partial to BMW's bigger car designs and less thrilled with their smaller cars. My e21 was still the best looking small BMW I ever owned. But their new cars drive much better than their predecessors and I don't think that trend will change with the E90. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"tim" > haute in die Tasten:
> Not sure as yet as few details are available, but for sure it'll > be an 'extra' on some models if not all. > iDrive is an option, which comes together with the Navi system and the additional LCD screen in the dashboard. Frank -- please replace spam-muelleimer with fk-newsgroups for e-mail contact Citroen - Made in Trance |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bradburn Fentress wrote:
> Bottom line: I just don't think BMW does ergonomics particularly well > if it has nothing to do with driving. They never really have. Both > the current I-drive and the button orgy of previous cars (The > non-I-drive 3 series will have the button orgy) are substandard. > That's just a fact....why nobody ever complained before is simply a > matter that they got used to pushing a button 8 times to get the fan > speed increased etc. I agree, but I don't agree that they were never good at this. BMW controls were exemplary through the mid-80s. I especially liked the old three levers and a knob HVAC controls. Nothing has ever been simpler or easier to use. It could have been straight out of Donald Norman's "The Design of Everyday Things." But BMW dropped the ball when everything became electronic. This is a common problem, though. It's hard to make a good user interface out of little buttons, and hard to make a cheap one out of anything else. Matt O. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bluetooth | John E Yurkon | BMW | 8 | December 30th 04 03:48 PM |