If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Update & Happy Ending Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Elle wrote:
> dan > wrote: > snip but all read and found helpful >> It is fairly easy to remove the rear bumper to see what's going on under >> there. > > I checked everything people listed here. The factory shop manual has a > single page for directions on how to get the bumper cover and > styrofoam absorber apart, and it is dead-on correct in what (easily > accessed) screws and bolts to remove. Everything looks good! I am > amazed that the styrofoam absorber is not cracked nor does it appear > deformed. At most, the bottom 3/8-inch of the styrofoam has small > indentations from where gravel from the road accumulated over the > years between the styrofoam and bumper cover. Then the gravel got > pushed into the styrofoam some, either from this rear-ending or lesser > ones over the years. The bumper beam looks fine. > > I guess the styrofoam, the bumper beam, and the car moving some upon > collision took the force (in the vein of Tegger's post). Kudos to > Honda engineers or whoever sets standards for bumpers. A little more > touchup paint here and there; some Armor All, and I think my Civic > will be good to go. > > Thanks again Jim, Tegger and Dan. That design was why I chose a Civic Si over a VW Golf in '86. (The VW salesman cheerfully explained the Golf's lack of a 5MPH bumper: "That's what the collision insurance is for!") And it survived at least one significant impact unscathed. |
Ads |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Update & Happy Ending Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Leftie > wrote in :
> > > That design was why I chose a Civic Si over a VW Golf in '86. (The > VW salesman cheerfully explained the Golf's lack of a 5MPH bumper: > "That's what the collision insurance is for!") And it survived at > least one significant impact unscathed. Except that Elle's Civic has a 2.5mph bumper, whihc kind of undermines your apparent point. Seems to have survived this incident just fine. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Tegger wrote:
> Elle > wrote in news:00476f13-f562-43bc-a945- > : > > >> To clarify and/or double check: There is no deformation of the bumper >> that appears on an external inspection. I asked the policeman about >> the styrofoam inside, and he said the external plastic would often >> bounce back, showing no deformation, but meanwhile the styrofoam >> inside could be permanently deformed. >> >> Is this not so from your understanding of bumper construction? > > > > The cop is correct. A junkyard crawl will confirm this. > > The steel bumper rebar is bolted to the car. The foam is affixed to the > bumper skin which covers the rebar. > > The foam is meant primarily to hold the bumper skin out to its finished > dimensions and shape. It also absorbs very minor "parking lot" type nudges. > Under heavier impacts, the foam tends to compress and break up into large > chunks. Those chunks often stay in place on account of the shape of the > skin, but they can become dislodged and even fall out. > > Theoretically, the rebar comes into play above 2.5mph (5mph in Canada), and > theoretically protects the lights and other safety systems from damage > during those impacts. Although I've seen too many instances where the > bumper appears to have provided little more protection than a 1960s bumper, > while costing a lot more. > > as tegger says, the styrofoam is of no consequence in any real accident, it's simply to hold cosmetic shape. the steel or gfrp bar underneath, and its mounting brackets, are what matter. if they're bent, the bumper always shows misalignment. afaik, honda build to 5mph rather than dick about with this keep-detroit-employed 2.5mph rubbish - doesn't take much of a nudge to open a full change tray. chances are, you're just fine. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Update & Happy Ending Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Tegger wrote:
> Leftie > wrote in : > > >> >> That design was why I chose a Civic Si over a VW Golf in '86. (The >> VW salesman cheerfully explained the Golf's lack of a 5MPH bumper: >> "That's what the collision insurance is for!") And it survived at >> least one significant impact unscathed. > > > > Except that Elle's Civic has a 2.5mph bumper, whihc kind of undermines your > apparent point. Seems to have survived this incident just fine. > > The design is nearly the same. The Golf had, near as I can tell, a "0.5MPh bumper." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
jim beam > wrote in
t: > afaik, honda build to 5mph I think you're right and I'm at least out-of-date in my information. According to www.riv.ca, the government-licensed agency that administers the importation of foreign vehicles into Canada, 1994-and-up Hondas are admissible without bumper modifications. Since Elle's '93 is the same as the '94, this means her bumpers are obviously 5mph ones. Since cars that are 15 model-years old or older are importable into Canada without any restrictions or modifications, they are no longer listed with RIV, so I can't check to see if earlier models had 2.5mph bumpers. However, it's still passing strange that Canada and the United States remain, since 1973, the only countries in the entire world to have bumper standards at all. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Yours is good info, fellows.
I googled a bit on the purpose of the styrofoam "absorber" (as it is called on parts sites). I thought this was interesting (from http://www.car-stuff.com/toyotabumperabsorber.htm): "... it is the Toyota bumper absorber that is usually made of Styrofoam or plastic that is positioned in between the bumper cover and the reinforcement to help strengthen the capacity of the bumper to absorb the impact created during collisions. In most cases, bumpers alone could not sustain the impact created during collisions, which is why a bumper assembly should be completed for maximum protection. If until now your bumper assembly is still lacking a Toyota bumper absorber, better equip your auto with one now or you probably would regret later on that you haven't. Bumpers are able to bounce the force back to the object that has collided with your auto instead of that force directly hitting your vehicle." A lot of helmet designs use styrofoam, for one, so the above seems reasonable. Seems there is a fair amount of chatter and dispute about whether the metal bumpers of say the 60s were better insofar as cutting down on damage to the vehicle. Maybe so but ISTM manufacturers also sought to lighten cars to achieve better gas mileage. Tradeoffs and all. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
Elle > wrote in news:a337a8ab-374f-4a4f-bb12-
: > > Seems there is a fair amount of chatter and dispute about whether the > metal bumpers of say the 60s were better insofar as cutting down on > damage to the vehicle. Maybe so but ISTM manufacturers also sought to > lighten cars to achieve better gas mileage. Tradeoffs and all. > > Around the mid-'60s, automakers started turning their bumpers into what might be more accurately termed "decorative chrome bars". Insurance claims for minor body damage began escalating about that time. Tired of the claims, and alarmed by the sleek, form-fitting "bumpers" installed on cars by the late '60s, insurance companies lobbied the federal government for impact standards in order to limit minor damage claims. From what I understand, the nascent safety zealots jumped in at the same time, claiming that safety was being undermined by lots of people driving around with broken headlights on account of the poor bumpers. The result of their combined efforts was the 5-mph bumper impact regulations, first imposed on the front bumpers of 1973 MY cars (except for hardtops and convertibles, for some odd reason, which got one more year to comply). The first energy-absorbing bumpers were essentially simple "logs" mounted on cylindrical struts that were filled with fluid of some kind, and were designed to collapse under impact. These assemblies were bulky and heavy (and usually ugly). As the CAFE regulations of 1975 got tighter and tighter over the years, automakers sought to make the original steel/aluminum battering-ram bumpers lighter and lighter. This is why we now have hybrid flexible/rigid bumpers: Light foam simply replaced the old heavy cylindrical struts. Your rebar -- the original "bumper" prior to 1973 -- is now rigidly mounted to the body shell, just like a 1972 model, but is now buried under a $400 plastic skin ($800 including paint). It's my understanding that insurance companies never really did get their hoped-for claims reductions: Better bumpers meant even /less/ careful drivers. Minor impact damage went down, but just about every other kind of collision damage went way up. A mixed blessing, to say the least. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Update & Happy Ending Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
"Tegger" > wrote in message ... > Elle > wrote in news:e9dad137-9980-4a03-aeba- > : > >> dan > wrote: >> snip but all read and found helpful >>> It is fairly easy to remove the rear bumper to see what's going on under >>> there. >> >> I checked everything people listed here. The factory shop manual has a >> single page for directions on how to get the bumper cover and >> styrofoam absorber apart, and it is dead-on correct in what (easily >> accessed) screws and bolts to remove. Everything looks good! I am >> amazed that the styrofoam absorber is not cracked nor does it appear >> deformed. At most, the bottom 3/8-inch of the styrofoam has small >> indentations from where gravel from the road accumulated over the >> years between the styrofoam and bumper cover. Then the gravel got >> pushed into the styrofoam some, either from this rear-ending or lesser >> ones over the years. The bumper beam looks fine. >> >> I guess the styrofoam, the bumper beam, and the car moving some upon >> collision took the force (in the vein of Tegger's post). Kudos to >> Honda engineers or whoever sets standards for bumpers. A little more >> touchup paint here and there; some Armor All, and I think my Civic >> will be good to go. >> >> Thanks again Jim, Tegger and Dan. > > > > Happy endings are always nice. > > > -- > Tegger > > The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ > www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ Yeah, you really have to check them over after a rear-ender. My wife got it in her 92 Seville. The bumper was shoved forward on one side and some other damage. I went to the Caddy dealer to pick it up after it was supposededly fixed. The bumper was replaced and looked fine. I got down on the ground and looked underneath. There was a small shock absorber on each side that went to the bumper. The one on the impact side had been damaged and compressed. Did they replace it? Hell no, just shoved a bunch of shims behind it and rebolted it. I was ****ed, raised hell and got it fixed right. Talk about shade tree mechanics, at a Caddy Dealership, no less. Really tightened my Van Allen belt ! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Update & Happy Ending Rear-Ended; New Bumper?
On Jul 7, 3:19*pm, Brian Smith > wrote:
> Elle wrote: > > Postscript: On reflecting on this accident and preventing it in the > > future, and from reading Dan's post, I think one of the lessons here > > is when there is a green light yet people ahead of one's car are not > > moving, glance at the rear-view mirror throughout and see what people > > in the back are doing. Maybe scoot the car up a little until people > > start moving. > > * * * * Yes moving forward when the vehicles in front of your vehicle haven't > moved would increase the odds of having your vehicle pushed into the > vehicle ahead of yours. Increasing the amount of damage to your vehicle > and involving other vehicles and people in the collision. good rule of thumb when stopped, always leave enough space in front of your car that you can see at least the rear bumper of the car in front of you, so that a rear impact won't totally squish your car. you might even be able to duck sideways out of the way. practice in your driveway at such things helps. stuff you need to know when you drive a civic in a world of suvs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2002 Jeep cherokee rear bumper will a 2000 bumper fit?? | Harry Palmer | Jeep | 9 | February 1st 07 02:19 PM |
rear-ended while parked--what to look for | zanzuz | Honda | 0 | October 13th 06 04:58 PM |
I Rear-Ended Someone | [email protected] | Driving | 15 | July 25th 06 11:10 PM |
C5 Rear-Ended!!! :-( | Pappy | Corvette | 12 | January 7th 06 11:36 PM |
Rear ended... | Chicago Paddling-Fishing | VW water cooled | 11 | November 13th 05 05:32 AM |