If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
short circuit?
We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead
and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading even though nothing was turned on. I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that we have something shorting? Thanks. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On 19 Nov 2004 12:14:54 GMT, *selah* > wrote:
>We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead >and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was >left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals >(with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading >even though nothing was turned on. > >I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that >we have something shorting? > >Thanks. It could indicate a dead battery. :-) What did you test the battery cables with? I assume a voltmeter? A better test would be to use an ammeter; this will tell you if there's a current draw. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, I should have said that I tested the battery cables, with the
battery removed, and didn't get an open circuit. In article >, Big Bill wrote: > On 19 Nov 2004 12:14:54 GMT, *selah* > wrote: > >>We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead >>and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was >>left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals >>(with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading >>even though nothing was turned on. >> >>I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that >>we have something shorting? >> >>Thanks. > > It could indicate a dead battery. :-) > What did you test the battery cables with? I assume a voltmeter? > A better test would be to use an ammeter; this will tell you if > there's a current draw. > |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I assume you are referring to actually testing the vehicle wiring via
the battery cables, not the battery. When you test the resistance (ohms), not the voltage, you shouldn't have an open circuit as you are supplying a voltage to the circuit to test the resistance. Since there is an onboard computer, clock, etc. all requiring a voltage to operate, they will take whatever power is supplied, even though it is inadequate to actually operate. Since this is the case, you cannot read your vehicle as having an open circuit. "*selah*" > wrote in message ... | We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead | and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was | left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals | (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading | even though nothing was turned on. | | I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that | we have something shorting? | | Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ok - thanks.
Is there some way to determine if there is a short somewhere? Is there a listing of what the resistance should be? "John Riggs" > wrote in message ... > I assume you are referring to actually testing the vehicle wiring via > the battery cables, not the battery. > When you test the resistance (ohms), not the voltage, you shouldn't have an > open circuit as you are supplying a voltage to the circuit to test the > resistance. Since there is an onboard computer, clock, etc. all requiring a > voltage to operate, they will take whatever power is supplied, even though > it is inadequate to actually operate. Since this is the case, you cannot > read your vehicle as having an open circuit. > > "*selah*" > wrote in message > ... > | We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead > | and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was > | left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals > | (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading > | even though nothing was turned on. > | > | I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that > | we have something shorting? > | > | Thanks. > > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The ohm-meter is notoriously inaccurate for most electrical systems tests.
It has it's uses when testing controlled continuity but in most instances, voltage drop testing is better. There is no factory spec on "system resistance"... if there was, it would be somewhere between 5 ohms and infinity (just joking...). For your situation, the logical procedure would be to charge the battery and have it tested. If the battery passes, have the charging system tested. After that, I can only suggest that you purchase the manual for your vehicle and use the proper method for testing for parasitic draw. 50 milliamps (after all the modules have "gone to sleep") is the factory spec on parasitic draw. Additionally, I would suggest referring to the manual that came with your meter for the various ways that it can be used. Tread carefully in your electrical testing... often, the unwary can create damage where none was before. Recent vehicles make extensive use of "voltage divider" circuits which makes these sorts of acidents less likely but we should always excersize caution to avoid costly mistakes. "*selah*" > wrote in message ... > Ok - thanks. > > Is there some way to determine if there is a short somewhere? Is there a > listing of what the resistance should be? > > > "John Riggs" > wrote in message > ... >> I assume you are referring to actually testing the vehicle wiring via >> the battery cables, not the battery. >> When you test the resistance (ohms), not the voltage, you shouldn't have > an >> open circuit as you are supplying a voltage to the circuit to test the >> resistance. Since there is an onboard computer, clock, etc. all requiring > a >> voltage to operate, they will take whatever power is supplied, even >> though >> it is inadequate to actually operate. Since this is the case, you cannot >> read your vehicle as having an open circuit. >> >> "*selah*" > wrote in message >> ... >> | We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead >> | and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was >> | left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals >> | (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading >> | even though nothing was turned on. >> | >> | I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that >> | we have something shorting? >> | >> | Thanks. >> >> > > |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:38:04 -0500, "*selah*" >
wrote: >Ok - thanks. > >Is there some way to determine if there is a short somewhere? Is there a >listing of what the resistance should be? I posted this earlier, but maybe it didn't get through (I haven't seen it)... Use an ammeter with the battery connected. This will tell you what the actual current draw is; there will always be some. Pulling fuses will tell you what circuits are pulling how much. If the battery is draining that quickly, you'll have a fairly large draw somewhere (or the battery is going bad). > > >"John Riggs" > wrote in message ... >> I assume you are referring to actually testing the vehicle wiring via >> the battery cables, not the battery. >> When you test the resistance (ohms), not the voltage, you shouldn't have >an >> open circuit as you are supplying a voltage to the circuit to test the >> resistance. Since there is an onboard computer, clock, etc. all requiring >a >> voltage to operate, they will take whatever power is supplied, even though >> it is inadequate to actually operate. Since this is the case, you cannot >> read your vehicle as having an open circuit. >> >> "*selah*" > wrote in message >> ... >> | We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead >> | and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was >> | left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals >> | (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading >> | even though nothing was turned on. >> | >> | I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that >> | we have something shorting? >> | >> | Thanks. >> >> > -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks to everyone for the input.
Was wondering what the current draw should be? "Big Bill" > wrote in message news > On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:38:04 -0500, "*selah*" > > wrote: > > >Ok - thanks. > > > >Is there some way to determine if there is a short somewhere? Is there a > >listing of what the resistance should be? > > I posted this earlier, but maybe it didn't get through (I haven't seen > it)... > Use an ammeter with the battery connected. This will tell you what the > actual current draw is; there will always be some. Pulling fuses will > tell you what circuits are pulling how much. If the battery is > draining that quickly, you'll have a fairly large draw somewhere (or > the battery is going bad). > > > > > > >"John Riggs" > wrote in message > ... > >> I assume you are referring to actually testing the vehicle wiring via > >> the battery cables, not the battery. > >> When you test the resistance (ohms), not the voltage, you shouldn't have > >an > >> open circuit as you are supplying a voltage to the circuit to test the > >> resistance. Since there is an onboard computer, clock, etc. all requiring > >a > >> voltage to operate, they will take whatever power is supplied, even though > >> it is inadequate to actually operate. Since this is the case, you cannot > >> read your vehicle as having an open circuit. > >> > >> "*selah*" > wrote in message > >> ... > >> | We've had a problem on a 92 explorer. The battery wemt dead > >> | and there was nothing left on. It happened after it was > >> | left sitting for 5 days or so. I tested the battery terminals > >> | (with the battery removed) didn't get an open circuit reading > >> | even though nothing was turned on. > >> | > >> | I assume there should be an open circuit, and this indicates that > >> | we have something shorting? > >> | > >> | Thanks. > >> > >> > > > > -- > Bill Funk > Change "g" to "a" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:41:55 -0500, "*selah*" >
wrote: >Thanks to everyone for the input. > >Was wondering what the current draw should be? Not positive (it will vary from vehicle to vehicle) but it should be in the low milliamp range. -- Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
50 ma.... that's .050 amps - after all the modules have gone to sleep.
"Big Bill" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:41:55 -0500, "*selah*" > > wrote: > >>Thanks to everyone for the input. >> >>Was wondering what the current draw should be? > > Not positive (it will vary from vehicle to vehicle) but it should be > in the low milliamp range. > > -- > Bill Funk > Change "g" to "a" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 7 | February 1st 05 01:43 PM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 18th 04 05:15 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | November 16th 04 05:28 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | November 1st 04 05:24 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | October 16th 04 05:28 AM |