If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors?
In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? I'm disappointed ... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote:
> Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? > > In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be > better? > > > I'm disappointed ... Well I have not heard that, but no matter. Additional cylinders means less vibration for the same power. When designing an engine the available space needs to be considered as well as many other factors. Life is full or trade offs. I guess this is just one more. The 4 might have better mileage, but more vibration. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
In rec.autos.makers.vw.watercooled, Joseph Meehan wrote:
>Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote: >> Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? >> >> In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be >> better? >> >> >> I'm disappointed ... > > Well I have not heard that, but no matter. Additional cylinders means >less vibration for the same power. When designing an engine the available >space needs to be considered as well as many other factors. Life is full >or trade offs. I guess this is just one more. > > The 4 might have better mileage, but more vibration. After reading this discussion, I found http://www.answers.com/topic/straight-5-1 to be of interest. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
"Chicago Paddling-Fishing" > wrote in message
... > Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? > > In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be > better? > > I'm disappointed ... well the thought of these are often "the power of a six with the fuel economy of a four". it's usually not quite either of those (has a little less power than a six and not as economical as a four). and in some cases people like to say it's "the fuel economy of a six with the power of a four"...heheheh. I think in the case of the VW 2.5 though, note that it's an engine that is offered in North America only. Not trying to open a big HP vs. torque debate, buuuuuutttt... Supposedly a nice high MPG four...VW doesn't have one that is inexpensive enough for a non-enthusiast entry level car like the Rabbit and lower-end Jettas. Many are praising the 1.4 TFSI (?) that VW has overseas (not sure if I got the letters right but i'm referring to the twincharger 1.4L FSI that's in the Mk5 Golf GT overseas) for its power and economy. However it is more expensive to make (I don't know specifics but I did read that somewhere) than the I-5 that we get. As "concerned" as we think we are about MPG, we 'Murricans don't like to give up our power either. And while we (uh-oh...i'm skirting the HP-torque debate) love our "I got <xxxxx> HP!" claims on paper, what most average 'Murricans "feel" is torque...accelerating from a standstill, merging onto a freeway, etc...we want that "push" and we want it NOW (low-end). The I-5 is a torquey engine designed for powerful normal driving, not powerful high-revving driving. That also makes it a decent fit for our market. And also we whine about our gas prices, yet the I-5 is rated by VW for regular unleaded. Not sure of the engines like the 1.4 above, but given that octane in Europe in petrol is usually higher than US gasoline anyway, I'll betcha that the 1.4 above won't like our "cheap" fuel. But if you're going to make an engine designed for our "cheap" fuel, that means lower compression ratio and less power "unless" you turn around and add a cylinder and/or make it larger to compensate. All in all yeah a higher-tech efficient 4-banger would be great, but Rabbits and Jettas and NBs for NA are aimed at everyday drivers, not enthusiasts, who don't want to buy premium fuel. That's what makes the 2.5 a decent fit for our market for these cars. Honestly the only gripe I have about VW and the 2.5 isn't the engine...it's that I think it's a mistake to offer the engine with a 5-speed manual. Should be a 6-speed manual, keep the revs down (it's torquey...should be able to handle lower revs on the highway w/o having to downshift to 5 to pass), and that would increase fuel economy more. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Chicago Paddling-Fishing > wrote:
>Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? > >In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? > > >I'm disappointed ... There is one. It's called the TDI. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Dave wrote:
> Chicago Paddling-Fishing > wrote: > >> Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? >> >> In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? >> >> >> I'm disappointed ... > > There is one. > > It's called the TDI. The Twincharger isn't so bad, either. Too bad VW hates Americans. -- Mike Smith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate miles per
gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few, six are too many" to market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000 quattro CS turbo has a 2.2L 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944 had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The audi gets better mpg with 1 more cylinder. It's about displacement, volumetric efficiency. "Chicago Paddling-Fishing" > wrote in message ... > Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? > > In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be > better? > > > I'm disappointed ... > > -- > John Nelson > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page > http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org > (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Tom's VR6 > wrote:
: In rec.autos.makers.vw.watercooled, Joseph Meehan wrote: :>Chicago Paddling-Fishing wrote: :>> Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? :>> :>> In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be :>> better? :>> :>> :>> I'm disappointed ... :> :> Well I have not heard that, but no matter. Additional cylinders means :>less vibration for the same power. When designing an engine the available :>space needs to be considered as well as many other factors. Life is full :>or trade offs. I guess this is just one more. :> :> The 4 might have better mileage, but more vibration. : After reading this discussion, I found : http://www.answers.com/topic/straight-5-1 to be of interest. There are other ways to deal with vibration. Porsche used balance shafts in it's large 2.5l, 2.7l and 3.0l 4 cylinder motors... I'm pondering cars and it's starting to come down to vw or a focus... we already have one focus and 37mpg is pretty attractive (it really does do that well on the highway), compared to 30mpg for the new rabbit... the difference is about 83 miles per tank, or about $9 per tankful... (that is assuming gas prices stay the same, and I'm assuming over the years I'll own this next car that the prices will rise a bit...) My 86 GTI is rated at 31mpg and gets about that, but it's rusting and I think the time has come to replace it... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Regal53 > wrote:
: The number of cylinders of an engine do not necessarily equate miles per : gallon; Audi motto in the 1980's was "four are too few, six are too many" to : market the type 43 audi 5000. So my 1987 5000 quattro CS turbo has a 2.2L : 5-cylinder, while my 1984 Porsche 944 had a 2.5L 4-cylinder motor. The audi : gets better mpg with 1 more cylinder. It's about displacement, volumetric : efficiency. Sadly, the vw doesn't get better mileage, unless you consider 22/30 better... (it's worse than last years models at a time when we really shouldn't be going that direction) The Focus has a 2.0l 4 cylinder with 136hp getting 27/37mpg, the Rabbit has a 2.5l 5 cylinder with 150hp getting 22/30mpg... neither requires premium... We are just hitting 70k miles on our 2000 Focus and so far, we have only paid to replaced brakes and rear wheel bearings, not bad for a 6 year old car driven by my teenage daughter... i can't fairly compare it against my 86 GTI though, as it's been thru some major repairs and is driven by my teenage son... I'll have to go drive one, but I'm not expecting to feel much difference between 136hp and 150hp, but I would feel $10 difference in gas every fillup pretty quickly... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why 5 cylinders?
Dave > wrote:
: Chicago Paddling-Fishing > wrote: :>Why do all the new vw's have 5 cylinder motors? :> :>In these days of high gas prices, wouldn't a nice, high mileage 4 be better? :> :> :>I'm disappointed ... : There is one. : It's called the TDI. I don't see any Rabbit TDI's listed... but i'll admit, even if there was, I wouldn't be a hot to go diesel... -- John Nelson ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chicago Area Paddling/Fishing Page http://www.chicagopaddling.org http://www.chicagofishing.org (A Non-Commercial Web Site: No Sponsors, No Paid Ads and Nothing to Sell) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
93 Accord hard only running on two cylinders | rasta1 | Honda | 14 | June 29th 06 01:20 PM |
AWA [OFFER] Clutch Kits, Master Cylinders,Slave Cylinders and more | [email protected] | General | 0 | April 11th 06 04:51 PM |
AWA [DEMAND] NEED SURPLUS MASTER CYLINDERS | [email protected] | General | 0 | March 30th 06 10:52 PM |
Cylinders 2-4-6 Too Rich | JoeBeem | BMW | 12 | March 2nd 06 03:23 PM |
5 cyl engine running on 4 cylinders (Audi 100, '89) | Christoph Bollig | Audi | 4 | July 29th 05 02:35 PM |