If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question about buying an old car
Hi there. I would be very interested in anyone's opinion on this
matter. I am looking to buy my first car (always lived in philly, used public trans for years before this). I really would like my first car to be a mid-60s era cadillac. My friends think this is a phenomenally bad idea. Folks point to a lack of 'crumple zones' or airbags in older cars, that I would constantly have to replace parts (which would be some serious long green), and even then, where would I get parts, that I couldn't rely on it to get me to work, and that it is just plain dangerous, blah blah blah. In your expert opinions, how seriously should I regard these naysayers, and how much of what they are saying is mambojahambo? Despite all of this, I still find myself pretty dead-set on the idea - what advice could you give someone in my position who knows very little about cars, and who is looking to buy an older vehicle? Thanks! WiA |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
WinterInAmerica wrote:
> Hi there. I would be very interested in anyone's opinion on this > matter. I am looking to buy my first car (always lived in philly, used > public trans for years before this). I really would like my first car > to be a mid-60s era cadillac. My friends think this is a phenomenally > bad idea. Folks point to a lack of 'crumple zones' or airbags in older > cars, that I would constantly have to replace parts (which would be > some serious long green), and even then, where would I get parts, that > I couldn't rely on it to get me to work, and that it is just plain > dangerous, blah blah blah. In your expert opinions, how seriously > should I regard these naysayers, and how much of what they are saying > is mambojahambo? Despite all of this, I still find myself pretty > dead-set on the idea - what advice could you give someone in my > position who knows very little about cars, and who is looking to buy an > older vehicle? > > Thanks! > WiA > I think that your friends are full of crap, a '60's Caddy would be an excellent driver car. Unlike Chevys and Fords of the same era, the Cadillac engines were excellently engineered and will last a long time with only routine maintenance. Moreover, they're usually owned by little-old-lady types and not abused. That said, if you know "very little about cars," you likely will be violated most unpleasantly by the first repair shop you bring such a machine to, and you should also not even buy a 30 year old car unless you know how to look for common signs of trouble. Some problems that look very scary are no big deal to someone who knows how to hold a wrench; some that appear to be no big deal mean lots of expensive work in the future. I'm not trying to discourage you from dreaming of one; just saying that you should learn how to work on an old car first, then go shopping. Sorry if I just burst your bubble. nate -- replace "fly" with "com" to reply. http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nate Nagel wrote: > > WinterInAmerica wrote: > > > Hi there. I would be very interested in anyone's opinion on this > > matter. I am looking to buy my first car (always lived in philly, used > > public trans for years before this). I really would like my first car > > to be a mid-60s era cadillac. My friends think this is a phenomenally > > bad idea. Folks point to a lack of 'crumple zones' or airbags in older > > cars, that I would constantly have to replace parts (which would be > > some serious long green), and even then, where would I get parts, that > > I couldn't rely on it to get me to work, and that it is just plain > > dangerous, blah blah blah. In your expert opinions, how seriously > > should I regard these naysayers, and how much of what they are saying > > is mambojahambo? Despite all of this, I still find myself pretty > > dead-set on the idea - what advice could you give someone in my > > position who knows very little about cars, and who is looking to buy an > > older vehicle? > > > > Thanks! > > WiA > > > > I think that your friends are full of crap, a '60's Caddy would be an > excellent driver car. Unlike Chevys and Fords of the same era, the > Cadillac engines were excellently engineered and will last a long time > with only routine maintenance. Moreover, they're usually owned by > little-old-lady types and not abused. > > That said, if you know "very little about cars," you likely will be > violated most unpleasantly by the first repair shop you bring such a > machine to, and you should also not even buy a 30 year old car unless > you know how to look for common signs of trouble. Some problems that > look very scary are no big deal to someone who knows how to hold a > wrench; some that appear to be no big deal mean lots of expensive work > in the future. I'm not trying to discourage you from dreaming of one; > just saying that you should learn how to work on an old car first, then > go shopping. Sorry if I just burst your bubble. > > nate > > The bad thing about Cadillacs is that they are an attractive "ghetto" vehicle that may have been abused check its history for sure). Also, northern GM cars of the era from northern rust belt regions can have serious frame rust. Lastly, oil pumps on Cadillacs are notorious for not picking up oil when standing for a length of time. Aside from that, a mid sixties Caddy is a great ride though a fuel thirsty one... -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I used to live near Philly and If you were to get an older cadillac i doubt
it would last to long on the street before it was stripped. "Grumpy au Contraire" > wrote in message ... > > > Nate Nagel wrote: > > > > WinterInAmerica wrote: > > > > > Hi there. I would be very interested in anyone's opinion on this > > > matter. I am looking to buy my first car (always lived in philly, used > > > public trans for years before this). I really would like my first car > > > to be a mid-60s era cadillac. My friends think this is a phenomenally > > > bad idea. Folks point to a lack of 'crumple zones' or airbags in older > > > cars, that I would constantly have to replace parts (which would be > > > some serious long green), and even then, where would I get parts, that > > > I couldn't rely on it to get me to work, and that it is just plain > > > dangerous, blah blah blah. In your expert opinions, how seriously > > > should I regard these naysayers, and how much of what they are saying > > > is mambojahambo? Despite all of this, I still find myself pretty > > > dead-set on the idea - what advice could you give someone in my > > > position who knows very little about cars, and who is looking to buy an > > > older vehicle? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > WiA > > > > > > > I think that your friends are full of crap, a '60's Caddy would be an > > excellent driver car. Unlike Chevys and Fords of the same era, the > > Cadillac engines were excellently engineered and will last a long time > > with only routine maintenance. Moreover, they're usually owned by > > little-old-lady types and not abused. > > > > That said, if you know "very little about cars," you likely will be > > violated most unpleasantly by the first repair shop you bring such a > > machine to, and you should also not even buy a 30 year old car unless > > you know how to look for common signs of trouble. Some problems that > > look very scary are no big deal to someone who knows how to hold a > > wrench; some that appear to be no big deal mean lots of expensive work > > in the future. I'm not trying to discourage you from dreaming of one; > > just saying that you should learn how to work on an old car first, then > > go shopping. Sorry if I just burst your bubble. > > > > nate > > > > > > > The bad thing about Cadillacs is that they are an attractive "ghetto" > vehicle that may have been abused check its history for sure). Also, > northern GM cars of the era from northern rust belt regions can have > serious frame rust. Lastly, oil pumps on Cadillacs are notorious for > not picking up oil when standing for a length of time. > > Aside from that, a mid sixties Caddy is a great ride though a fuel > thirsty one... > > > > -- > JT > > Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I grew up on old cars. I am 41 years old, and I've been driving other people's
old cars almost for as long as I've been driving. If you can find a mid 60's car in your area that is in decent condition (you should be able to negotiate with the dealer or seller to allow you to have a safety inspection performed), it's worth a try. In my experience (I had a '59 Studebaker for a while and then a '67 Lincoln), a lot of repair facilities will NOT be willing or able to help you when it comes to having parts replaced. I used to take my cars upto the neighborhood gas stations (before I started doing my own maintenence), and they used to be able to order the routine tune-up parts and so on, but while I had those cars, they claimed that that can't order that stuff anymore. So as a result, I would go to the auto parts stores (the older well-established ones like Napa, for example) and they would supply me with my parts (I would have to know exactly what I want when I go in there). Then I would stockpile some of the routine replacement parts, and when it was time for maintenence, I would take my parts along with the shop manual & owners manual upto the gas station, and then they would do the work. I had that experience with shock absorbers also. Speedy Muffler couldn't order them. I already had a mail order catalog which contained all of that stuff for my Studebaker, but my Dad suggested that the local stores should be able to order the stuff too. Well, nobody could, and so I ended up having to get the parts by mail. You should invest in mail order parts catalogs specifically for your car. Studebaker was easy, but I was not able to find any such catalogs for the Lincoln that I had. I wanted to have the brakes replaced, and the gas station was able to get the brake pads, but nothing else. I had a parts store order the rebuilt calapers for me, but they couldn't get the brake hoses. I ended up going through the yellow pages phone book and seeing an add for Vintage Auto Parts in the state of Washington. I live in Ohio, and here was an ad for Washington. Since absolutely no one here could order the hoses for me, I called them. They had them and sold them to me for about $200 for the pair. They had special fittings on the ends that no one else could supply. My guess is that they must have bought the machines from Ford when they stopped making them. Then, I had a 1970 Chevy Nova. I didn't have much difficulty with that car. It seems as though the repair shops were better able to get parts for a 1970 than for a 1967 or a 1959. I really like the old cars, but I can't afford to gamble with my transportation in such a way. I have to know that I can have a repair made and be on my way to work, and to not be waiting for weeks while parts are being located, shipped, and then installed. Right now I own a 1993 GMC Safari Van and a 2003 Chevy S10 Pickup Truck. I've decided to say with General Motors, and have had more sucess with GM products over the years. The only thing I can say to you is to do a lot of research, and when you find the car of your choice, get your parts catalogs and repair manuals. Don't rely on the shops to have the stuff, because they may not- you really never know. Dale Wein TeleDale Key Service, http://www.angelfire.com/wizard/teledale 1811 Saratoga Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44109 U.S.A. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
WinterInAmerica > wrote:
W> Hi there. I would be very interested in anyone's opinion on this W> matter. I am looking to buy my first car (always lived in philly, used W> public trans for years before this). I really would like my first car W> to be a mid-60s era cadillac. My friends think this is a phenomenally W> bad idea. Folks point to a lack of 'crumple zones' or airbags in older W> cars, that I would constantly have to replace parts (which would be W> some serious long green), and even then, where would I get parts, that W> I couldn't rely on it to get me to work, and that it is just plain W> dangerous, blah blah blah. In your expert opinions, how seriously W> should I regard these naysayers, and how much of what they are saying W> is mambojahambo? Despite all of this, I still find myself pretty W> dead-set on the idea - what advice could you give someone in my W> position who knows very little about cars, and who is looking to buy an W> older vehicle? W> Thanks! W> WiA 60's Cadillacs are great, but you pay a premium when buying one, getting parts or at the shop, as compared to say, a Chebby. Others have already given sound advice, I'd just like to emphasize some of them. Philly is in the Rust Belt, so be careful of rust buckets; Bondo and a cheap paint job can easily hide terminal cancer. Try going for one with low mileage on the clock; If the odometer is shot, check the rubber on the brake pedal. Mechanical items are relatively easy/inexpensive to fix/replace; however a new interior will cost you an arm and a leg. You want fins? The last finned Caddy is from '64. If not, I would recommend a '68-and-up 4-door model (DeVille). They have the virtually bullet-proof, beefy 472ci with the Turbo-HydraMatic-400 tranny, and a 4-door is less likely to end up in a chop-shop than a Coupe. The ideal situation would be if you could/would be doing most of the (regular maintenance) work yourself, or you would be willing to learn as you go. You'd save tons of money and not be on the mercy of sharks. It is true that you cannot expect to find all you might need just by walking in to any auto parts store; however, there's always eBay and the WEB, not just Hemming's. Other things to consider, in random order: Get the *BEST* available species you can afford; <-- This is my #1 tip! Be careful when you see "reasonably priced" cars that need only "some TLC"; Approach a potential candidate with knowledge; Look beyond the Rust Belt; If you're concerned about gas money, don't buy a Cadillac; Stockpile parts; Join The Cadillac Mailing List: http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/thecml/ You have shown that you have a discriminatory taste, now what you'll need is the will and you can have a wondeful automobile (An old Caddy is not a car, you know...). Good luck! -Bela ('62 60S, '97 STS) -- I shook my family tree, and a bunch of nuts fell out... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lots of good advice already given. Especially like the comment
about the 'other' car being the crumple zone! Very true. If you want one, go for it. I've had a '64 Lincoln for about 15 years and its been an awesome car. Riceboxes get out of its way when they see it in their rear view mirror. With any older car, expect to have to do a fair amount of work. Part wear out and it doesn't matter if its a VW or Mercedes. If you pay someone else to fix it, expect to pay a lot. You'll be far better off if you learn how to pull your own wrenches. Also, buy the best car you can afford. Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I'm still driving my 1953 Ford. It even has the original engine and never
been touched. I know im lucky but so far is hasnt let me down. I drive it not only around town, but take it hundreds of miles, and so far it has always brought me back. I do have the two safety features installled, AAA and cel phone. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Nate Nagel3" wrote:
> > >I think that your friends are full of crap, a ’60’s Caddy >would be an >excellent driver car. Unlike Chevys and Fords of the same era, the >Cadillac engines were excellently engineered and will last a long time > >with only routine maintenance. Moreover, they’re usually owned >by >little-old-lady types and not abused. > >That said, if you know "very little about cars," you likely will be >violated most unpleasantly by the first repair shop you bring such a >machine to, and you should also not even buy a 30 year old car unless >you know how to look for common signs of trouble. Some problems that >look very scary are no big deal to someone who knows how to hold a >wrench; some that appear to be no big deal mean lots of expensive work > >in the future. I’m not trying to discourage you from dreaming >of one; >just saying that you should learn how to work on an old car first, >then >go shopping. Sorry if I just burst your bubble. > >nate > Dude, I would say, do whatever you want. Ignore those people people. If you want to buy a good car, bring a mechanic friend if you have one. Also, a small, strong magnet is a good way to find bondo work and heavy rust. Remember that not everyone is an expert. Example: the quote attached. GM builds both the Chevrolet and the Cadillac. The older Cadillacs are worth a lot of money, and probably worth whatever you put into it and probably more. -- Posted using the http://www.autoforumz.com interface, at author's request Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards Topic URL: http://www.autoforumz.com/Antique-Ca...pict97899.html Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.autoforumz.com/eform.php?p=477867 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"BadBow99S10" wrote:
> [quote:b34b62fac9="Nate Nagel3"] > > I think that your friends are full of crap, a '60's Caddy > would be an > excellent driver car. Unlike Chevys and Fords of the same > era, the > Cadillac engines were excellently engineered and will last a > long time > with only routine maintenance. Moreover, they're usually > owned by > little-old-lady types and not abused. > > That said, if you know "very little about cars," you likely > will be > violated most unpleasantly by the first repair shop you bring > such a > machine to, and you should also not even buy a 30 year old car > unless > you know how to look for common signs of trouble. Some > problems that > look very scary are no big deal to someone who knows how to > hold a > wrench; some that appear to be no big deal mean lots of > expensive work > in the future. I'm not trying to discourage you from dreaming > of one; > just saying that you should learn how to work on an old car > first, then > go shopping. Sorry if I just burst your bubble. > > nate > [/quote:b34b62fac9] > > Dude, > I would say, do whatever you want. Ignore those people > people. If you want to buy a good car, bring a mechanic friend > if you have one. Also, a small, strong magnet is a good way to > find bondo work and heavy rust. Remember that not everyone on > these boards is an expert. Example: the quote attached. GM > builds both the Chevrolet and the Cadillac. The older > Cadillacs are worth a lot of money, and probably worth > whatever you put into it and probably more. If you can’t figure it out, what I meant above, was that Chevy and Cadillacs normally use the same engine. As for Fords, they just $u(k. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transmission fluid filter question | LIW | Audi | 0 | November 22nd 04 04:45 PM |
Buying 545: SMG question | Rick DeBay | BMW | 1 | November 20th 04 08:06 AM |
JEEP question - 4.0 vs 4.0HO | James Morrow | 4x4 | 12 | June 2nd 04 05:16 PM |
Used 156 buying Advice Please ? | Steve Haigh | Alfa Romeo | 0 | April 28th 04 09:12 PM |