A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto newsgroups » Antique cars
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

1957 Jaguar XK140 FHC w/ automatic transmission



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 04, 02:37 PM
Jay Castor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 1957 Jaguar XK140 FHC w/ automatic transmission

See detailed website with 12 beautiful photos:

http://pages.sbcglobal.net/jcastor/jag.html
Ads
  #4  
Old July 4th 04, 01:09 AM
Ted Azito
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>
>
> FYI, that "slushbox" was a Detroit Gear unit designed by Studebaker and
> was perhaps the most sophisticated tranny of its era including a lock up
> converter and numerous interlocks to keep stupid people from doing
> stupid things.
>
> Jag's mistake was in its choice of the lightest duty version of the unit...


Jaguar looked at that unit and also the GM Hydramatic. Eventually
they did go to the THM in the V12 and swappers today often put in the
700R4. But an automatic trans in a car like the XK was silly-unless
you were Arthur Miller.
  #5  
Old July 4th 04, 05:06 PM
Ken Doyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Since this was made before 1962, this would be the cast-iron Borg-Warner,
not the aluminum one. The cast-iron trans has a pretty good reputation.

Ken D.

"Ted Azito" wrote:
> I wonder how much work it would be to get rid of that troublesome
> piece of **** Borg Warner slushbox and put in a Richmond Gear five or
> six speed....



  #6  
Old July 4th 04, 07:08 PM
Grumpy au Contraire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It was NOT a B/W.

That transmission was designed by Studebaker around 1950 in cahoots with
Detroit Gear which was later taken over by B/W. It has not connection
whatsoever with the cast iron B/W units. I was a proprietary designed
that was licensed from Studebaker after 1955. Studebaker did retain its
use in Champion six equipped vehicles in 1956 and that would have been
the 150 version.

Certainly, Jag should have used at least the 200 if not the 250 versions
in their vehicles. Why they didn't, go figure...

And yes, The B/@ cast iron units are virtually bullet proof, simple to
work on and enjoyed widespread use in domestic and foreign vehicles.

--
JT

Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4






Ken Doyle wrote:
>
> Since this was made before 1962, this would be the cast-iron Borg-Warner,
> not the aluminum one. The cast-iron trans has a pretty good reputation.
>
> Ken D.
>
> "Ted Azito" wrote:
> > I wonder how much work it would be to get rid of that troublesome
> > piece of **** Borg Warner slushbox and put in a Richmond Gear five or
> > six speed....

  #7  
Old July 8th 04, 01:48 AM
Ken Doyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for the info!

Ken D.

"Grumpy au Contraire" > wrote in message
...
> It was NOT a B/W.
>
> That transmission was designed by Studebaker around 1950 in cahoots with
> Detroit Gear which was later taken over by B/W. It has not connection
> whatsoever with the cast iron B/W units. I was a proprietary designed
> that was licensed from Studebaker after 1955. Studebaker did retain its
> use in Champion six equipped vehicles in 1956 and that would have been
> the 150 version.
>
> Certainly, Jag should have used at least the 200 if not the 250 versions
> in their vehicles. Why they didn't, go figure...
>
> And yes, The B/@ cast iron units are virtually bullet proof, simple to
> work on and enjoyed widespread use in domestic and foreign vehicles.
>
> --
> JT
>
> Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ken Doyle wrote:
> >
> > Since this was made before 1962, this would be the cast-iron

Borg-Warner,
> > not the aluminum one. The cast-iron trans has a pretty good reputation.
> >
> > Ken D.
> >
> > "Ted Azito" wrote:
> > > I wonder how much work it would be to get rid of that troublesome
> > > piece of **** Borg Warner slushbox and put in a Richmond Gear five or
> > > six speed....



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E39 (530d) Problems with automatic transmission? Marko Grossmann BMW 12 October 16th 04 04:47 AM
s10 blazer transmission swap amaralliya e. thenardier 4x4 8 June 23rd 04 04:22 AM
89 Suzuki Sidekick automatic transmission swap question Maxxron 4x4 4 June 9th 04 11:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.