If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#411
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Putney wrote:
> Sparky wrote: > >> Linda wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >> >> TIA > > Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you did > post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice pun. > > Bill Putney > (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my > adddress with the letter 'x') > > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet > News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the > World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total > Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Ads |
#412
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Putney wrote:
> Sparky wrote: > >> Linda wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >> >> TIA > > Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you did > post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice pun. > > Bill Putney > (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my > adddress with the letter 'x') > > > ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet > News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the > World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total > Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#413
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. >> >> Bill Putney >> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my >> adddress with the letter 'x') >> >> >> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet >> News==---- >> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >> >100,000 Newsgroups >> ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- > BIG GRIN!!!! |
#414
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. >> >> Bill Putney >> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my >> adddress with the letter 'x') >> >> >> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet >> News==---- >> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >> >100,000 Newsgroups >> ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- > BIG GRIN!!!! |
#415
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. > > Took a 2nd look & you're right - sorry for the confusion. > > (I had to look back to the dogwood tree reference) |
#416
|
|||
|
|||
Sparky wrote:
> Bill Putney wrote: > >> Sparky wrote: >> >>> Linda wrote: >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> Please watch your snipping & quoting - I did not post "KNOTHEAD". >>> Actually, I didn't see anything I posted in your quoted text. >>> >>> TIA >> >> Sparkmeister - according to the attributions my browser shows, you >> did post "KNOTHEAD". I had even commented to you that it was a nice >> pun. > > Took a 2nd look & you're right - sorry for the confusion. > > (I had to look back to the dogwood tree reference) |
#417
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:51:41 -0500, "Steve Bigelow" > > wrote: > >> >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > Sorry; insert "intend to". |
#418
|
|||
|
|||
Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:51:41 -0500, "Steve Bigelow" > > wrote: > >> >> "Big Bill" > wrote in message >> news >>>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >>> >>> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >>> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >>> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice >>> about it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a >>> while. >>> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >>> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> >> Malign? >> How? Is being gay still a big deal in the US? >> > Sorry; insert "intend to". |
#419
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Big Bill wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>> Big Bill wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke >>>>>>> was gay, I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. >>>>>>> They were Men's Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think >>>>>>> otherwise. " >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. >>>>>> That's not anywhere near what was written. >>>>>> What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to >>>>>> support your claim. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I >>>>> cannot find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>>> >>>> >>>> Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>> generate requests for some evidence??? >>>> >>> >>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >> >> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about >> it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you > for thinking both.... > Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read > your original posts.... |
#420
|
|||
|
|||
linda wrote:
> Big Bill wrote: >> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda > >> wrote: >> >> >>> Big Bill wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke >>>>>>> was gay, I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. >>>>>>> They were Men's Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think >>>>>>> otherwise. " >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. >>>>>> That's not anywhere near what was written. >>>>>> What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to >>>>>> support your claim. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I >>>>> cannot find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be? >>>> >>>> >>>> Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would >>>> generate requests for some evidence??? >>>> >>> >>> Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and >>> again as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a >>> claim that our beloved duke was *OMG* gay..... >> >> >> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young? >> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, >> so I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about >> it." This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while. >> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you >> say. Especially when you malign an ICON. >> > i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you > for thinking both.... > Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read > your original posts.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_gadkypy | Michael Barnes | Driving | 4 | January 4th 05 06:47 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! ___________ mixqec | [email protected] | Chrysler | 37 | November 18th 04 04:18 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ gadkypy | Paul | Antique cars | 3 | November 9th 04 06:54 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!___________ mixqec | indago | Chrysler | 7 | November 8th 04 05:05 PM |