If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CobraJet's vs GT40Patrick's
The little GT40 head comparision thread got me thinking. As much as CJ
hates my guts and I can't stand his stuck in the past attitude, automotively, I think we're quite similar. So I started thinking about what we have in common. I don't have a lot of time tonight to post, so I'm only throwing out a few ideas. But first, here's what we won't discuss in this thread: 12-second muscle cars and how classics compare to late models. With that said, let's find similiarities. Over the years here are some things I think we both like or prefer: Station wagons Sleepers Large displacement Normally aspirated Strippers Tweaked, but factory appearing Straight-line cars CJ, so far so good? (Agree damn it... just say yes and nod your head. Let's get out of the blocks and lay down the first 60-feet without wheel-hopping or spining the tires.) Can you think of anything else we disagree about? And what else do you think we agree on? Patrick '93 Cobra |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com>,
> wrote: > The little GT40 head comparision thread got me thinking. As much as CJ > hates my guts and I can't stand his stuck in the past attitude, > automotively, I think we're quite similar. So I started thinking about > what we have in common. I don't have a lot of time tonight to post, so > I'm only throwing out a few ideas. > But first, here's what we won't discuss in this thread: 12-second > muscle cars and how classics compare to late models. With that said, > let's find similiarities. > > Over the years here are some things I think we both like or prefer: > > Station wagons > Sleepers > Large displacement > Normally aspirated > Strippers > Tweaked, but factory appearing > Straight-line cars > > CJ, so far so good? (Agree damn it... just say yes and nod your head. > Let's get out of the blocks and lay down the first 60-feet without > wheel-hopping or spining the tires.) > > Can you think of anything else we disagree about? And what else do you > think we agree on? Did you see the news story John URL'd comparing mechanics to technicians? This is the essential difference between you and me. I'm a gearhead, you belong to the plug-and-play group. The attitude *you* call "stuck in the past", is referred to as "nostalgia" by the vast majority of car-minded 40+ year-olds. The fact that you name C&D as your fave shows me you would never consider an all-out buildup of anything yourself. So it really goes back to the apples and oranges thing. You are trying to find a common ground to ease things a bit; I say it really doesn't matter. Why? Because I *own* several of every vehicle you have in that list above, and you own a '93 Cobra. I get greasy; you pay lip service. Apples and oranges. Next week, if it doesn't rain anymore, I'll post pics of my Ranger's engine to show you what I enjoy farting around with. > > Patrick > '93 Cobra > -- CobraJet Thunder Snake #1 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"CobraJet" > wrote in message
... > In article .com>, > > wrote: > >> The little GT40 head comparision thread got me thinking. As much as CJ >> hates my guts and I can't stand his stuck in the past attitude, >> automotively, I think we're quite similar. So I started thinking about >> what we have in common. I don't have a lot of time tonight to post, so >> I'm only throwing out a few ideas. >> But first, here's what we won't discuss in this thread: 12-second >> muscle cars and how classics compare to late models. With that said, >> let's find similiarities. >> >> Over the years here are some things I think we both like or prefer: >> >> Station wagons >> Sleepers >> Large displacement >> Normally aspirated >> Strippers >> Tweaked, but factory appearing >> Straight-line cars >> >> CJ, so far so good? (Agree damn it... just say yes and nod your head. >> Let's get out of the blocks and lay down the first 60-feet without >> wheel-hopping or spining the tires.) >> >> Can you think of anything else we disagree about? And what else do you >> think we agree on? > > Did you see the news story John URL'd comparing mechanics to > technicians? This is the essential difference between you and me. I'm a > gearhead, you belong to the plug-and-play group. The attitude *you* > call "stuck in the past", is referred to as "nostalgia" by the vast > majority of car-minded 40+ year-olds. The fact that you name C&D as > your fave shows me you would never consider an all-out buildup of > anything yourself. > > So it really goes back to the apples and oranges thing. You are > trying to find a common ground to ease things a bit; I say it really > doesn't matter. Why? Because I *own* several of every vehicle you have > in that list above, and you own a '93 Cobra. I get greasy; you pay lip > service. Apples and oranges. > > Next week, if it doesn't rain anymore, I'll post pics of my Ranger's > engine to show you what I enjoy farting around with. If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has modified the t-shirts to fit better. Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. -- John ThunderSnake #59 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote:
> If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has > modified the t-shirts to fit better. That's yet to be determined. > Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. And my t-shirts say, has completed 5Ks, 10Ks and half marathons. Wanna race? Patrick '93 Cobra |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
> wrote in message
oups.com... > John wrote: > >> If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > >> CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has >> modified the t-shirts to fit better. > > That's yet to be determined. > >> Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. > > And my t-shirts say, has completed 5Ks, 10Ks and half marathons. Wanna > race? Sure, using my rules. The first one to puke wins! -- John ThunderSnake #59 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote:
> >> Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. > > And my t-shirts say, has completed 5Ks, 10Ks and half marathons. > > Wanna race? > Sure, using my rules. The first one to puke wins! lol I hope I'm not doing that after tomorrow's race. I'm doing 13.1. Last year I made it in 1:48. This year I'm shooting for 1:30s. Not sure if my old body will get me there, but we'll find out. (Any runners in this NG?) For those not in to running, or can't run, walking is a good substitute. The main thing is just being active. Patrick '93 Cobra |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
John wrote: > If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > > CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has modified > the t-shirts to fit better. > > Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. I don't know where you newer Thundersnakes are getting your info, but you've pretty much got that backwards. 180 Out |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com>,
> wrote: > John wrote: > > > If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > > > > CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has > modified > > the t-shirts to fit better. > > > > Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. > > I don't know where you newer Thundersnakes are getting your info, but > you've pretty much got that backwards. > > 180 Out > Are you trying to convince *anyone* that Patrick knows more about this stuff than I do? -- CobraJet Thunder Snake #1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
CobraJet wrote:
> wrote: > > > John wrote: > > > > > If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > > > > > > CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has > > modified > > > the t-shirts to fit better. > > > > > > Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. > > > > I don't know where you newer Thundersnakes are getting your info, but > > you've pretty much got that backwards. > > > > 180 Out > > > Are you trying to convince *anyone* that Patrick knows more about > this stuff than I do? No, what I wrote is that Patrick has a better claim to "been there done that" than you do. Emphasis on the "doing," not the "knowing." I don't know where the newbies are getting their info, but it doesn't match what I've been reading in these groups the past four years. 180 Out |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
CobraJet wrote:
> > > If I may explain the diff. using a cliche: > > > CJ - Been there, done it several times, got the t-shirts, and has > > > modified the t-shirts to fit better. > > > Patrick - Got a picture of one of CJ's t-shirts. > > I don't know where you newer Thundersnakes are getting your info, > > but you've pretty much got that backwards. > Are you trying to convince *anyone* that Patrick knows more about > this stuff than I do? Do I know more than you about this stuff...? What I think is that you have the reference manual from hell, that's what I think. Even with out the manual, I wouldn't doubt you know more about the classic stuff because you live there. Automotively, for you, the world stopped somewhere around '73-'74. So you only need to know about 10 years worth. Study that small amount of information long enough and you _should_ know it upside down and backwards. Myself, on the other hand, was just like you until the '82 GT Mustang made its debut. Then I started gobbling up info on every subsequent model year of car since, plus some foreign, so of course my knowledge on the details of the old stuff is going to be foggy in comparision. Try stuffing about 33 years of automotive info in your brain. And even the 70's stuff I like to read about now, so the 33 years of info is up to nearly 40, and growing. But that's just talking about "knowing". Expirience is something else. Am I claiming, or have I ever claimed to be, a mechanic? No. Am I afraid to get my hands dirty? No. Here's my list of things I've done: replaced starter rebuilt/installed carbs replaced water pumps replaced rocker arms replaced cam/bearings installed U/D pullies installed timing chain installed headers, x & h pipes installed rear gears replaced alternator installed clutch cables/quadrants performed brake jobs - including drum replaced rotors & calipers installed shift kit replaced valve cover gaskets replaced/swapped intake manifolds installed shocks replaced radiators/hoses repacked/replaced wheel bearings replaced a computer installed shifters replaced fenders/doors/hoods stripped paint performed bodywork/paint prep replaced/installed oak bed in pickup replaced/installed throttle body/EGR/TPS sensor/mass-air meter & sensor replaced clutch on an A/C compressor all the tune-up junk (points, plugs, wires ect.) and various sensors Things I haven't done, but would love to. Never pulled heads, got in the bottom end, rebuilt a trans, and have never done a clutch job (Never needed to. My LX's had more than a 100K on its original when I sold the car, and my Cobra's has a 100K on it now and it still has plenty of bite). I'd like to do these four tasks, but so far I haven't needed to. But to be honest, I wouldn't do them right now because my Cobra is my daily driver, that is unless I had a knowledgeable friend looking over my shoulder. So that's it for the "plug-n-play guy". Your turn to step up to the plate, self-proclaimed, "Mr. Gearhead". Patrick '93 Cobra |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|