If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Cory Dunkle" > wrote in message
... > "Skip Elliott Bowman" > wrote in message > hlink.net... >> There doesn't seem to be a website for the Haddon Township PD, so I went > to >> the NJSP website and found this link to filing complaints: >> >> http://www.state.nj.us/lps/njsp/comp/complain.html >> >> Among other guidelines, it says: "The Office of Professional Standards > will >> thoroughly investigate all reports of misconduct by troopers regardless >> of >> the source. Anyone who files a complaint against a trooper will be >> treated >> with courtesy and respect." >> >> If you were treated rudely, you have legal recourse. > > Thanks for the link. If you are cirous here is the Haddon Twp PD website. > It's pretty useless. > http://www.haddontwp.com/police.php Thanks, Cory. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message
... > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:48:31 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > > wrote: > > >I went in to the police station today. Seemed to stir up some commotion when > >I talked to the woman behind the glass. She told me to wait and the > >Leutenant would come talk to me shortly. Then a cop walked out adn asked if > >I was being helped, I said yes, I was waiting for the Leutenant who was > >going to speak to me. The cop asked waht it was about so I politely told him > >what I saw. He got very defensive and asked how I knew he didn't go out on a > >call and it was cancelled. I explained that the cop waited at the next red > >light, and that no matter which way you slice it running a red light and > >doing twice the speed limit in a residential zone is reckless. He didn't > >like that and told me no it was not reckless or unsafe, then walked away. > > > >A minute or two Later the Leutenant came out adn brought me to his office. I > >explained what I saw and gave him the license plate number, time, and > >location. He seemed understanding, but again asked how I knew he wasn't on a > >call that was cancelled. > > "I don't know, Lieutenant - but YOU do. You have access to your > dispatch records, so you'll know if the officer in question was on a > call or not at the time I observed him. Go look at your dispatch logs > and take it from there." When I gave him the date, time and location I did mention that he could check to see if the officer actually was on call. He seemed polite and respectful, and I hope he does do something about the situation. Even if the officer was on call, he was still behaving dangerously and recklessly. As far as I'm concerned, it's a moot point as to whether the officer was on call. If he wasn't, he should not have been running red lights and doing twice the limit in a residential zone with familys out and about. If he was, he should have at least had his lights on, and probably should have used his siren when running the red light. Cory |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message
... > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:48:31 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > > wrote: > > >I went in to the police station today. Seemed to stir up some commotion when > >I talked to the woman behind the glass. She told me to wait and the > >Leutenant would come talk to me shortly. Then a cop walked out adn asked if > >I was being helped, I said yes, I was waiting for the Leutenant who was > >going to speak to me. The cop asked waht it was about so I politely told him > >what I saw. He got very defensive and asked how I knew he didn't go out on a > >call and it was cancelled. I explained that the cop waited at the next red > >light, and that no matter which way you slice it running a red light and > >doing twice the speed limit in a residential zone is reckless. He didn't > >like that and told me no it was not reckless or unsafe, then walked away. > > > >A minute or two Later the Leutenant came out adn brought me to his office. I > >explained what I saw and gave him the license plate number, time, and > >location. He seemed understanding, but again asked how I knew he wasn't on a > >call that was cancelled. > > "I don't know, Lieutenant - but YOU do. You have access to your > dispatch records, so you'll know if the officer in question was on a > call or not at the time I observed him. Go look at your dispatch logs > and take it from there." When I gave him the date, time and location I did mention that he could check to see if the officer actually was on call. He seemed polite and respectful, and I hope he does do something about the situation. Even if the officer was on call, he was still behaving dangerously and recklessly. As far as I'm concerned, it's a moot point as to whether the officer was on call. If he wasn't, he should not have been running red lights and doing twice the limit in a residential zone with familys out and about. If he was, he should have at least had his lights on, and probably should have used his siren when running the red light. Cory |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message
... > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:57:01 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > > wrote: > > >> "I don't know, Lieutenant - but YOU do. You have access to your > >> dispatch records, so you'll know if the officer in question was on a > >> call or not at the time I observed him. Go look at your dispatch logs > >> and take it from there." > > > >When I gave him the date, time and location I did mention that he could > >check to see if the officer actually was on call. He seemed polite and > >respectful, and I hope he does do something about the situation. > > And that is pretty much the limit of what you can accomplish directly. > Unless you can document a pattern of such abuses, in which case the > local news media will become interested in your research. > > I commend you for taking the time and effort to report this incident. > Most people wouldn't bother. Thanks. I figure I've not bothered enough time that this one was too much and too easy. The cop was sitting right there in front of me at the next light so I had a clear view of his plate number. If people don't report this sort of thing cops will think they can do wahtever they want with no repercussions for their reckless behavior. They are there to serve the public and keep the roads and towns safe. Sometimes they seem to forget that, and who pays their salary. Cory |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message
... > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:57:01 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" > > wrote: > > >> "I don't know, Lieutenant - but YOU do. You have access to your > >> dispatch records, so you'll know if the officer in question was on a > >> call or not at the time I observed him. Go look at your dispatch logs > >> and take it from there." > > > >When I gave him the date, time and location I did mention that he could > >check to see if the officer actually was on call. He seemed polite and > >respectful, and I hope he does do something about the situation. > > And that is pretty much the limit of what you can accomplish directly. > Unless you can document a pattern of such abuses, in which case the > local news media will become interested in your research. > > I commend you for taking the time and effort to report this incident. > Most people wouldn't bother. Thanks. I figure I've not bothered enough time that this one was too much and too easy. The cop was sitting right there in front of me at the next light so I had a clear view of his plate number. If people don't report this sort of thing cops will think they can do wahtever they want with no repercussions for their reckless behavior. They are there to serve the public and keep the roads and towns safe. Sometimes they seem to forget that, and who pays their salary. Cory |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
"Cory Dunkle" > wrote in message
... If people don't report this > sort of thing cops will think they can do wahtever they want with no > repercussions for their reckless behavior. They are there to serve the > public and keep the roads and towns safe. Sometimes they seem to forget > that, and who pays their salary. This is what they call "police accountability". |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
"Cory Dunkle" > wrote in message
... If people don't report this > sort of thing cops will think they can do wahtever they want with no > repercussions for their reckless behavior. They are there to serve the > public and keep the roads and towns safe. Sometimes they seem to forget > that, and who pays their salary. This is what they call "police accountability". |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message ... > Cory Dunkle wrote: > >> I went in to the police station today. Seemed to stir up some commotion >> when >> I talked to the woman behind the glass. She told me to wait and the >> Leutenant would come talk to me shortly. Then a cop walked out adn asked >> if >> I was being helped, I said yes, I was waiting for the Leutenant who was >> going to speak to me. The cop asked waht it was about so I politely told >> him >> what I saw. He got very defensive and asked how I knew he didn't go out >> on a >> call and it was cancelled. I explained that the cop waited at the next >> red >> light, and that no matter which way you slice it running a red light and >> doing twice the speed limit in a residential zone is reckless. He didn't >> like that and told me no it was not reckless or unsafe, then walked away. > > HAHAHAHAHA! Jaybird, you got a brother in NJ? See? I told ya I'm not the only one who understands... -- --- jaybird --- I am not the cause of your problems. My actions are the result of your actions. Your life is not my fault. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good Good Deals! | Brendan Carpenter | Dodge | 0 | April 20th 04 04:05 AM |