If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#421
|
|||
|
|||
Steve isn't getting enough. I have seen the symptoms before, but thank God
never experienced them. I don't know why the rest of you boys insist on playing with him. Earle "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message . .. Well, let's all line up to kiss his ass! I've dealt with enough millionaires to know that they can be losers too... this one sounds like a prime example of an asshole, albeit a rich asshole. Notice who hangs around these types... draws 'em like flies. __ Steve .. |
Ads |
#422
|
|||
|
|||
It occurs to me that every time Clinton was caught in a new scandal that he
would attack some foreign power. In at least one case he made a feeble strike at bin Laden. If he would have followed through perhaps 911 would never of happened. It really doesn't matter if Sadaam had WMD or not. He has used them in the past against both his own people and neighboring countries. He 13 years later claimed he had no weapons but was unable to provide ANY documentation of their disposition or disposal. He continued to impede the weapons inspectors in violation of his surrender agreement after the first gulf war. He was an actual threat to the stability of the mid-east region and since such a large percentage of the world's energy resources come from there the entire industrialized world had national interests in regional stability. (Yes, the evil oil companies are the problem..... "War for Oil"..) The continuing problems are not from "insurgents" but from TERRORISTS who are more than happy to continue killing their own citizens who are trying to reform their own government that wants to provide freedom for all, not just Sadaam's supporters.. If I were in charge I would not treat these terrorists so kindly, I would follow the Israeli model of reprisal. If your village hosts a terrorist cell that attacks me, I'd wipe out the entire village and then boast proudly about it. Do I fell sorry for the "innocents" in these terrorist villages? NO, if you food, clothe, and house a terrorist then you are a terrorist no matter if you are male, female, 8 or 80. Had you served in Vietnam you would know that the slopes (err... communist citizens of Vietnam) would just as likely send their children to beg for candy carrying grenades as look at you and the ARVN (south Vietnamese army) was so full of Vietcong that when you ferried them anywhere you had to cover them with your miniguns to prevent them from rolling a grenade back at you. But we digress. I think the problem is that we are too easy-going on these Iraqi TERRORISTS. No one $crews with the Russian "Peacekeepers" because they know the soviet method of pacification is to kill all the terrorists, all of their family members, and everyone they ever met. Brutal, but it works.... as hard as it is for me to say anything nice about the russkies. To paint all "happily married", "attentive husband and fathers", "active church members", and "scout leaders" as psychopathic killers is a bit overblown and simplistic even for the far left fringe. You conveniently forget that the "god fearing", "active church boys", demanding freedom died to provide the freedoms you enjoy. The saying goes.. "Freedom isn't free." I don't really resemble Dennis Rader all that much, while my hair is rapidly turning white I still have a full head of hair. I'm not happily married, my wife ran off with *one* of her boyfriends leaving me a single parent. I did study for the priesthood which surprises many of the people who find out, and I was a church based scout leader. I have also vote in all the elections since I turned 21 and give money to most of the village charities. My parents got us started years ago with Habitat for Humanity (a favorite of Jimmy Carter). I guess I do have all the qualifications to be considered a member of the "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" although I am not a registered republican. I vote independent.... I vote for the best man. Actually I vote for the man that I think will screw things up the least. Usually that man is a republican but not always... I am proud that I am the 13th generation of soldiers in the family. My father fought in two wars, I fought in one and a collection of "military actions" and don't complain that I will walk with a limp the rest of my life. My nephew is proudly serving as a combat engineer in Iraq. My family has protected the citizenry of their areas back at least to 1625 in Europe and in north America before this country war born by fighting for the British in the French and Indian war. It really bunches my shorts when a panty-waste complains about how his freedom is provided. You want to complain? Pick up a rifle and join me walking the wire. After they dig out a load of shrapnel you can complain all you want and I'll support you. Till then SHUT THE F%&K UP! billy ray, american "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message . .. "Billy Ray" > wrote in message ... .... >I wrote: > "Billy Ray" > wrote : >> > Perhaps I am showing my age or reflecting on the "knowledge" based >> > education I received in the pre-(wacko) environmentalist days by >> > teachers >> > who taught for the love of teaching and the sacred duty of passing >> > education to the youth of our civilization and not the current >> > generation >> > of mal-content, long haired ,pinko, commie, liberal, tree hugging, >> > volvo >> > driving, teddy kennedy-eugene mccarthy- jimmy carter-clinton voting, >> > perverts who went into teaching because it offered an automatic >> > exemption >> > from national service during the Vietnam war. >> You're a *real* poopie-head... talk to your NeoCon buddies >> about *exemptions*... cowards all. George Will, Pat Buchannan, >> Bill O'Reilly, Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, Rush Limbaugh, >> Phil Gramm, Clarence Thomas, Newt Gingrich, Saxby Chambliss, >> Bill Bennett, Ken Starr, Judd Gregg, John Ashcroft, Tom Delay... >> Dick Cheney... deferred. Chickenhawks, we call them. > I find it odd that Democrats are suddenly so very interested in the > particulars of military service. They didn't seem to care during Clinton's > electoral process. Whimpering noted! Clinton didn't commit the country to *war*, on trumped-up evidence... that's the '-hawk' part of 'chickenhawk'. Impressive list, isn't it? >> Let's talk for a minute about your buddy, Dennis Rader... >> model citizen, though just like you, voted just like you, >> looked just like you... the sickest f*ck out there. He's >> your buddy... you deserve him. You're not going to defend your *buddy*? He certainly wasn't a "mal-content, long haired ,pinko, commie, liberal, tree hugging, volvo-driving, teddy kennedy-eugene mccarthy- jimmy carter-clinton voting, pervert(s)"... he was of the much more dangerous kind, a RW wacko... like McVey or Koresh. Strange how excesses on the Left are never quite as awe-inspiring as those on the Right... Clinton's pecker vs. Iraq, basically. __ Steve .. |
#423
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the link Doug. I like the sound of that Usenet group based on
the description at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.07/alt.pave.html In actuality there are more trees in north America now than there were in 1900. This is because the lumber companies almost a century ago started planting more trees than they cut down. I am not really as hard line as I sound sometimes.... although my brother tells everyone I think that Richard Nixon was a liberal..... I was very testy with Stephen in an earlier post. It must be the hot and humid weather. Note: science has shown that climate changes are a totally natural event that have happened constantly in the recorded (in rock and ice) history of the planet. I believe there is something to the theory of the "greenhouse effect" but I do not believe it is anywhere as serious as the wacko environmentalists would want you to believe. I personally believe they would garner more support if they offered the truth instead of exaggeration. It is interesting to note that when Al Gore's advisor on global warming admitted that some of his original conclusions were based on improper assumptions that no change was made in Gore's environmental platform. <sigh> Perhaps I am a Neanderthal. My last 6 vehicles have been sports cars or SUVs.... I wanted them, I could afford them, so I bought them.... Perhaps my next jeep will be powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. When I was in college we were taught that a vehicle that expelled only water and carbon dioxide was non-polluting.... "DougW" > wrote in message news:Xtvwe.22203$mC.1905@okepread07... > Stephen Cowell did pass the time by typing: >> "Billy Ray" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Everything that the environmental movement has proclaimed since its >>> coming >>> of age in the 1960s and 1970s has turned out to be wrong. >> >> Oh, boy... another one. So deforestation's good? Jeeping on >> the Moon, better than in the forest? It's good to dump crankcase >> oil in the gutter, or in your backyard? Rivers that burn are >> better than those that don't? Industry should not be regulated >> at all? One from the looney bin... > > alt.pave.the.earth > > -- > DougW > > > |
#424
|
|||
|
|||
I'll agree that those theories were probably taught in grade school when I
was a youth. I see from the web address it is now a college course at Georgia State University. > > DIFFUSION. > > Here is a grade school level page on the subject: > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/diffus.html > .. |
#425
|
|||
|
|||
So you have our thunder storm clouds reaching the height of the
ozone, now? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ jeff wrote: > > There are no puddles of dichlordifluoromethane laying around, as there > are no puddles of argon, CO2, or O2. How come? All are heavier than the > admixture we call "air". > > DIFFUSION. > > Here is a grade school level page on the subject: > http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/diffus.html > > BTW, If you want to know how CFCs get to the stratosphere, look at the > thermal loops in tropical cumulonimbus formations. They can build and > carry hailstones the size of grapefruits. |
#426
|
|||
|
|||
Wow. Don't forget the taxpayers who made it all possible, even as far back
as 1625. I'll bet Stevie isn't one of those either. You should do some research though, and see who popularized the "wipe out a whole village" tactic. The Israelis did not invent it. In fact, I remember it being used to justify 911... Earle "Billy Ray" > wrote in message ... > It occurs to me that every time Clinton was caught in a new scandal that he > would attack some foreign power. In at least one case he made a feeble > strike at bin Laden. If he would have followed through perhaps 911 would > never of happened. > > It really doesn't matter if Sadaam had WMD or not. He has used them in the > past against both his own people and neighboring countries. He 13 years > later claimed he had no weapons but was unable to provide ANY documentation > of their disposition or disposal. He continued to impede the weapons > inspectors in violation of his surrender agreement after the first gulf war. > > He was an actual threat to the stability of the mid-east region and since > such a large percentage of the world's energy resources come from there the > entire industrialized world had national interests in regional stability. > (Yes, the evil oil companies are the problem..... "War for Oil"..) > > The continuing problems are not from "insurgents" but from TERRORISTS who > are more than happy to continue killing their own citizens who are trying to > reform their own government that wants to provide freedom for all, not just > Sadaam's supporters.. > > If I were in charge I would not treat these terrorists so kindly, I would > follow the Israeli model of reprisal. If your village hosts a terrorist > cell that attacks me, I'd wipe out the entire village and then boast proudly > about it. Do I fell sorry for the "innocents" in these terrorist villages? > NO, if you food, clothe, and house a terrorist then you are a terrorist no > matter if you are male, female, 8 or 80. > > Had you served in Vietnam you would know that the slopes (err... communist > citizens of Vietnam) would just as likely send their children to beg for > candy carrying grenades as look at you and the ARVN (south Vietnamese army) > was so full of Vietcong that when you ferried them anywhere you had to cover > them with your miniguns to prevent them from rolling a grenade back at you. > But we digress. > > I think the problem is that we are too easy-going on these Iraqi TERRORISTS. > No one $crews with the Russian "Peacekeepers" because they know the soviet > method of pacification is to kill all the terrorists, all of their family > members, and everyone they ever met. Brutal, but it works.... as hard as it > is for me to say anything nice about the russkies. > > To paint all "happily married", "attentive husband and fathers", "active > church members", and "scout leaders" as psychopathic killers is a bit > overblown and simplistic even for the far left fringe. You conveniently > forget that the "god fearing", "active church boys", demanding freedom died > to provide the freedoms you enjoy. The saying goes.. "Freedom isn't free." > > I don't really resemble Dennis Rader all that much, while my hair is rapidly > turning white I still have a full head of hair. I'm not happily married, my > wife ran off with *one* of her boyfriends leaving me a single parent. I did > study for the priesthood which surprises many of the people who find out, > and I was a church based scout leader. I have also vote in all the > elections since I turned 21 and give money to most of the village charities. > My parents got us started years ago with Habitat for Humanity (a favorite of > Jimmy Carter). > > I guess I do have all the qualifications to be considered a member of the > "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" although I am not a registered republican. I > vote independent.... I vote for the best man. Actually I vote for the man > that I think will screw things up the least. Usually that man is a > republican but not always... > > I am proud that I am the 13th generation of soldiers in the family. My > father fought in two wars, I fought in one and a collection of "military > actions" and don't complain that I will walk with a limp the rest of my > life. My nephew is proudly serving as a combat engineer in Iraq. My family > has protected the citizenry of their areas back at least to 1625 in Europe > and in north America before this country war born by fighting for the > British in the French and Indian war. > > It really bunches my shorts when a panty-waste complains about how his > freedom is provided. You want to complain? Pick up a rifle and join me > walking the wire. After they dig out a load of shrapnel you can complain all > you want and I'll support you. Till then SHUT THE F%&K UP! > > billy ray, american > > > "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message > . .. > > "Billy Ray" > wrote in message > ... > ... > >I wrote: > > "Billy Ray" > wrote : > >> > Perhaps I am showing my age or reflecting on the "knowledge" based > >> > education I received in the pre-(wacko) environmentalist days by > >> > teachers > >> > who taught for the love of teaching and the sacred duty of passing > >> > education to the youth of our civilization and not the current > >> > generation > >> > of mal-content, long haired ,pinko, commie, liberal, tree hugging, > >> > volvo > >> > driving, teddy kennedy-eugene mccarthy- jimmy carter-clinton voting, > >> > perverts who went into teaching because it offered an automatic > >> > exemption > >> > from national service during the Vietnam war. > > >> You're a *real* poopie-head... talk to your NeoCon buddies > >> about *exemptions*... cowards all. George Will, Pat Buchannan, > >> Bill O'Reilly, Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, Rush Limbaugh, > >> Phil Gramm, Clarence Thomas, Newt Gingrich, Saxby Chambliss, > >> Bill Bennett, Ken Starr, Judd Gregg, John Ashcroft, Tom Delay... > >> Dick Cheney... deferred. Chickenhawks, we call them. > > > I find it odd that Democrats are suddenly so very interested in the > > particulars of military service. They didn't seem to care during Clinton's > > electoral process. > > Whimpering noted! Clinton didn't commit the country > to *war*, on trumped-up evidence... that's the '-hawk' > part of 'chickenhawk'. Impressive list, isn't it? > > >> Let's talk for a minute about your buddy, Dennis Rader... > >> model citizen, though just like you, voted just like you, > >> looked just like you... the sickest f*ck out there. He's > >> your buddy... you deserve him. > > You're not going to defend your *buddy*? He certainly > wasn't a "mal-content, long haired ,pinko, commie, liberal, > tree hugging, volvo-driving, teddy kennedy-eugene mccarthy- > jimmy carter-clinton voting, pervert(s)"... he was of the > much more dangerous kind, a RW wacko... like McVey > or Koresh. Strange how excesses on the Left are never > quite as awe-inspiring as those on the Right... Clinton's > pecker vs. Iraq, basically. > __ > Steve > . > > |
#427
|
|||
|
|||
Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice balls, they are certainly not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because "it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash. -- jeff L.W.(ßill) Hughes III got tired of beating his strawman and wrote: > So you have our thunder storm clouds reaching the height of the > ozone, now? <That is not what I said and you God-Damned well know it> >>BTW, If you want to know how CFCs get to the stratosphere, look at the >>thermal loops in tropical cumulonimbus formations. They can build and >>carry hailstones the size of grapefruits. |
#428
|
|||
|
|||
You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height? Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a loser if can be lead by false statements! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O http://www.billhughes.com/ jeff wrote: > > Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you. > > The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the > stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at > about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical > cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which > is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy > hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice balls, they are certainly > not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice > has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times > that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry > ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of > times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because > "it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash. > > -- > jeff |
#429
|
|||
|
|||
Billy Ray did pass the time by typing:
> Thanks for the link Doug. I like the sound of that Usenet group based on > the description at http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.07/alt.pave.html > > In actuality there are more trees in north America now than there were in > 1900. This is because the lumber companies almost a century ago started > planting more trees than they cut down. True, but they mostly plant quick growth pine, not slow growth. Which is a bit misleading. > I am not really as hard line as I sound sometimes.... although my brother > tells everyone I think that Richard Nixon was a liberal..... He wasn't? With the laws at least. > I was very testy with Stephen in an earlier post. It must be the hot and > humid weather. Note: science has shown that climate changes are a totally > natural event that have happened constantly in the recorded (in rock and > ice) history of the planet. The earth will be here long after the human population has gone extinct. Recorded history amounts to nothing compared to the overall age of this dirtball. > I believe there is something to the theory of the "greenhouse effect" but I > do not believe it is anywhere as serious as the wacko environmentalists > would want you to believe. I personally believe they would garner more > support if they offered the truth instead of exaggeration. Yep. They think too short term without taking into account the geological record. But then > It is interesting to note that when Al Gore's advisor on global warming > admitted that some of his original conclusions were based on improper > assumptions that no change was made in Gore's environmental platform. Yes, I thought that was interesting as well. > <sigh> Perhaps I am a Neanderthal. My last 6 vehicles have been sports cars > or SUVs.... I wanted them, I could afford them, so I bought them.... Same here, but I got rid of a 9mpg smog bomb of a truck and got the ZJ. > Perhaps my next jeep will be powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. When I was in > college we were taught that a vehicle that expelled only water and carbon > dioxide was non-polluting.... If there are enough plants, that's true. I have my 10 speed bike. Unfortunately with this weather the indoor pollution when I get to work makes it more of an environmental hazard than the ZJ. -- DougW |
#430
|
|||
|
|||
>> In actuality there are more trees in north America now than there were in >> 1900. This is because the lumber companies almost a century ago started >> planting more trees than they cut down. > > True, but they mostly plant quick growth pine, not slow growth. Which is a > bit misleading. I am, in actuality, a supporter of conservation. I live in a small village that is in the center of the largest park in the area. The village fathers early in the century set it up so no additional "development" could take place. > >> I am not really as hard line as I sound sometimes.... although my brother >> tells everyone I think that Richard Nixon was a liberal..... > > He wasn't? With the laws at least. I don't think anyone envisioned the inmates taking control of the asylum when the EPA was set up. > >> I was very testy with Stephen in an earlier post. It must be the hot and >> humid weather. Note: science has shown that climate changes are a >> totally >> natural event that have happened constantly in the recorded (in rock and >> ice) history of the planet. > > The earth will be here long after the human population has gone extinct. > Recorded history amounts to nothing compared to the overall age of this > dirtball. I never cease to be amazed at the number of people that think we have the ability to destroy the planet even if we tried. We may well wipe ourselves out but the earth will continue, and heal itself. >> I believe there is something to the theory of the "greenhouse effect" but >> I >> do not believe it is anywhere as serious as the wacko environmentalists >> would want you to believe. I personally believe they would garner more >> support if they offered the truth instead of exaggeration. > > Yep. They think too short term without taking into account the geological > record. But then > >> It is interesting to note that when Al Gore's advisor on global warming >> admitted that some of his original conclusions were based on improper >> assumptions that no change was made in Gore's environmental platform. > > Yes, I thought that was interesting as well. > >> <sigh> Perhaps I am a Neanderthal. My last 6 vehicles have been sports >> cars >> or SUVs.... I wanted them, I could afford them, so I bought them.... > > Same here, but I got rid of a 9mpg smog bomb of a truck and got the ZJ. > >> Perhaps my next jeep will be powered by a hydrogen fuel cell. When I was >> in >> college we were taught that a vehicle that expelled only water and carbon >> dioxide was non-polluting.... > > If there are enough plants, that's true. > > I have my 10 speed bike. Unfortunately with this weather the indoor > pollution when I get to work makes it more of an environmental hazard > than the ZJ. I occasionally will ride my bike around the relatively flat areas of the park (about 45 minutes) but I wouldn't even consider it in this weather. I used to be amused when the Greenpeace terrorists would put on a show at the local school. They would tell the children about the evils of slash and burn farming in south America and how many acres are rendered useless every year. It took a while, and lots of photos, to convince my younger daughter that the second you stop pushing back the jungle it comes roaring back. It also seems interesting that we (the civilized world) have the audacity to tell a 3rd world country that they cannot do the exact same thing we did half a a century ago to improve our standard of living. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Conditioning (A/C) Trouble | [email protected] | Chrysler | 5 | June 2nd 05 04:24 AM |
Maxi-Frig for R12/R134A ? | Henry Kolesnik | Technology | 39 | May 26th 05 06:31 AM |
Disposal of Refrigerant 12 dichlorodifluoromethane? | Wayne Pein | Technology | 4 | April 13th 05 11:26 PM |
Climatronic Diagnostic Controls | Luís Lourenço | Audi | 1 | November 12th 04 09:22 AM |