A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Ford Mustang
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dissing the MavGrabber



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 23rd 07, 11:06 PM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
Backyard Mechanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 141
Default Dissing the MavGrabber

http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10

"Car Lust--Ford Maverick Grabber
9:36 AM PDT, October 22, 2007
The Ford Maverick, a heavier and less sporting machine than the Ford
Pinto on which it was based (a difficult concept to wrap one's head
around), was a weak and flaccid family sedan, featuring the all-too-
familiar 1970s bugaboos of a strangled engine, flexible and weak chassis,
and garish styling."

Especially hard to wrap your head around since it was based on the
Falcon..

Heh... considering I had 'retired' {young married} from street mod
machines for 5 years when the Mav Grabber was popular, { and considering
THE OTHER CHOICES in the Ford lines!!!}, I find anyone denigrating either
the MAV/Falcon or Pinto platform a little foolish!

Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but the
owner could do a lot to fix 'em.

Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give my
left nut for one.
Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under and
rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum - YUM!

But I'd settle for a Grabber II...

--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
Ads
  #2  
Old October 24th 07, 01:17 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 565
Default Dissing the MavGrabber

On Oct 23, 5:06 pm, Backyard Mechanic > wrote:

If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked
the Maverick Grabbers.

Mustang II - No
Grabber - Yes

Patrick


> http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10
>
> "Car Lust--Ford Maverick Grabber
> 9:36 AM PDT, October 22, 2007
> The Ford Maverick, a heavier and less sporting machine than the Ford
> Pinto on which it was based (a difficult concept to wrap one's head
> around), was a weak and flaccid family sedan, featuring the all-too-
> familiar 1970s bugaboos of a strangled engine, flexible and weak chassis,
> and garish styling."
>
> Especially hard to wrap your head around since it was based on the
> Falcon..
>
> Heh... considering I had 'retired' {young married} from street mod
> machines for 5 years when the Mav Grabber was popular, { and considering
> THE OTHER CHOICES in the Ford lines!!!}, I find anyone denigrating either
> the MAV/Falcon or Pinto platform a little foolish!
>
> Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but the
> owner could do a lot to fix 'em.
>
> Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give my
> left nut for one.
> Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under and
> rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum - YUM!
>
> But I'd settle for a Grabber II...
>
> --
> Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
> you pay..DEAL with it!



  #3  
Old October 24th 07, 03:51 AM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
elaich[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 46
Default Dissing the MavGrabber

Backyard Mechanic > wrote in
:

> Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but
> the owner could do a lot to fix 'em.
>


My buddy had a Comet with the small block back in the day (same car) and
said that changing spark plugs was an all day job. He is probably
exaggerating.


> Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give
> my left nut for one.
> Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under
> and rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum -
> YUM!


A local wrecking yard had a sweet little '77 Ghia a year ago that had
been dumped in front of the place at night. It was in nice shape, and had
a blown up 302 in it. Looked like almost new dual exhausts. The interior
was nice (if cheap) and the paint was even good. Before I could get back
to get it, some ^%$&* mini-stock racer had bought it, knocked all the
windows out, and put a 2.3 in it. That's what happens to all the Pintos,
Mustangs, and Capris around here. Even the 1980s Fox body Mustangs are
rare. If you see a Pinto (other than on the track) it is just passing
through.


--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
  #4  
Old October 24th 07, 06:11 PM posted to rec.autos.makers.ford.mustang
John B.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 224
Default Dissing the MavGrabber


> wrote in message
ps.com...
> On Oct 23, 5:06 pm, Backyard Mechanic > wrote:
>
> If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked
> the Maverick Grabbers.
>
> Mustang II - No
> Grabber - Yes
>
> Patrick
>

Mustang II - No
Grabber - No
Pinto - HELL, no!
Torino - Yes!!!

John B.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F1 dissing women drivers now ? rms Simulators 15 July 3rd 05 04:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.