If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dissing the MavGrabber
http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10
"Car Lust--Ford Maverick Grabber 9:36 AM PDT, October 22, 2007 The Ford Maverick, a heavier and less sporting machine than the Ford Pinto on which it was based (a difficult concept to wrap one's head around), was a weak and flaccid family sedan, featuring the all-too- familiar 1970s bugaboos of a strangled engine, flexible and weak chassis, and garish styling." Especially hard to wrap your head around since it was based on the Falcon.. Heh... considering I had 'retired' {young married} from street mod machines for 5 years when the Mav Grabber was popular, { and considering THE OTHER CHOICES in the Ford lines!!!}, I find anyone denigrating either the MAV/Falcon or Pinto platform a little foolish! Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but the owner could do a lot to fix 'em. Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give my left nut for one. Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under and rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum - YUM! But I'd settle for a Grabber II... -- Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price you pay..DEAL with it! |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dissing the MavGrabber
On Oct 23, 5:06 pm, Backyard Mechanic > wrote:
If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked the Maverick Grabbers. Mustang II - No Grabber - Yes Patrick > http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNK2XTEJMSFK0E10 > > "Car Lust--Ford Maverick Grabber > 9:36 AM PDT, October 22, 2007 > The Ford Maverick, a heavier and less sporting machine than the Ford > Pinto on which it was based (a difficult concept to wrap one's head > around), was a weak and flaccid family sedan, featuring the all-too- > familiar 1970s bugaboos of a strangled engine, flexible and weak chassis, > and garish styling." > > Especially hard to wrap your head around since it was based on the > Falcon.. > > Heh... considering I had 'retired' {young married} from street mod > machines for 5 years when the Mav Grabber was popular, { and considering > THE OTHER CHOICES in the Ford lines!!!}, I find anyone denigrating either > the MAV/Falcon or Pinto platform a little foolish! > > Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but the > owner could do a lot to fix 'em. > > Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give my > left nut for one. > Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under and > rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum - YUM! > > But I'd settle for a Grabber II... > > -- > Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price > you pay..DEAL with it! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dissing the MavGrabber
Backyard Mechanic > wrote in
: > Ford couldnt really help how they had to build those machines... but > the owner could do a lot to fix 'em. > My buddy had a Comet with the small block back in the day (same car) and said that changing spark plugs was an all day job. He is probably exaggerating. > Chris H prolly thinks the Mustang II is a lost cause.. heh! I'd give > my left nut for one. > Break out the cutters and radius those well-wells, then crawl under > and rebuild the chassis .. drop in some tasty late model EFI.. Yum - > YUM! A local wrecking yard had a sweet little '77 Ghia a year ago that had been dumped in front of the place at night. It was in nice shape, and had a blown up 302 in it. Looked like almost new dual exhausts. The interior was nice (if cheap) and the paint was even good. Before I could get back to get it, some ^%$&* mini-stock racer had bought it, knocked all the windows out, and put a 2.3 in it. That's what happens to all the Pintos, Mustangs, and Capris around here. Even the 1980s Fox body Mustangs are rare. If you see a Pinto (other than on the track) it is just passing through. -- A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of the message. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Dissing the MavGrabber
> wrote in message ps.com... > On Oct 23, 5:06 pm, Backyard Mechanic > wrote: > > If you're taking a poll I wasn't a fan of the Mustang II, but I liked > the Maverick Grabbers. > > Mustang II - No > Grabber - Yes > > Patrick > Mustang II - No Grabber - No Pinto - HELL, no! Torino - Yes!!! John B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F1 dissing women drivers now ? | rms | Simulators | 15 | July 3rd 05 04:55 PM |