If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
DTJ > wrote in
: > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:26:55 -0700, "Phil Scott" > wrote: > >> What will you do about the 20 million living spread out >>across the US and inside our US corporations here and abroad? > > If there were really that many terrorists in the US we wouldn't be > here. > Most US Moslems know how good they have it here in the US. Better than in any Arab country. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Ads |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Hornberger > wrote in
news:1121484882.0a6a37bf53e7656618c919050cdff2b1@t eranews: > On 7/15/05 11:24 PM, in article > , "DTJ" > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:06:30 -0700, "Phil Scott" >> > wrote: >> >>> These people had not come after us...we went after them..then >>> they retaliated...now they think they have a higher cause in >>> seeing us dead. >> >> Another moron in the file... > > > Do you suppose he believes that America "got what was coming to them" > on 9/11 ? > > I get that impression. Phil might want to read this; http://nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson200507150804.asp -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Hornberger > wrote in
news:1121549054.4a3df15d1363f1c09e29d3505053b291@t eranews: > On 7/16/05 3:33 PM, in article , "Robert J. > Kolker" > wrote: > >> Phil Scott wrote: >>> >>> You know, we have spent a million dollars to take out each >>> ****ed off iraqi cab driver... they are spending about 38 >>> cents to kill each of our good young men...or send them home >>> blind and paralized. >> >> Pull our troops out and start tossing nukes. Only our enemies and >> collateral foreign innocents will die. We could kill two billion in >> under a month as long as one has no scruples about colateral damage. >> >> Bob Kolker > > > Wow, I *JUST* got done watching "The Day After". > > No thanks. > > I SURELY hope you don't get your information from MOVIES. They are FICTION,and only meant for entertainment. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Jul 2005 05:13:51 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:
>DTJ > wrote in : > >> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:26:55 -0700, "Phil Scott" > wrote: >> >>> What will you do about the 20 million living spread out >>>across the US and inside our US corporations here and abroad? >> >> If there were really that many terrorists in the US we wouldn't be >> here. > >Most US Moslems know how good they have it here in the US. >Better than in any Arab country. Most of the Muslims here in the US actually favor what we are doing in the Middle East. The only people complaining are some of the idiot liberals, the media, and the terrorists. I believe the term is Helsinki syndrome, where people take the side of their captor, and actually argue the side of the captor. Kind of like what liberals, the media, and a lot of europeons are doing. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Jul 2005 05:17:55 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:
>> Pull out? No. I believe we're generally doing what can be done without >> inciting massacres and bloodbaths. However, we *could* buff the troops >> a bit with supplies and equipment. > >???? >The factories are working hard to supply the troops with armor,what other >supplies/equipment are they lacking? We can always do better. >> ... or just take control and make the whole freaking region a US >> Territory for 99 years like England did with colonies in the far east. > >Interesting that Britain left most of their colonies with reasonably decent >governments. That is what democracy is all about. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Hank > wrote in :
> Ken Smith wrote: >> [KRP] wrote: > >> > How is that possible when 90% of even the AMERICAN MEDIA is vehemently >> > ANTI-AMERICAN? > >> What are you smoking, Panger? The only stories we get are those our >> corporate masters want us to hear, and the only laws that get passed are >> the ones our corporate masters bribed our legislators to pass. > > Isn't that what he meant by anti-American? The U.S. > corporate owned and censored mainstream corporate media > parrot the bu$h's regime's anti American lies more like > stenographers than reporters. If anyone is anti-American, > it's the lying, thieving, cowardly, draft dodging war > criminals, terrorists, and war profiteers on the bu$h > regime. > Nonsense;the mainstreamm media have been attacking Bush ever since he was first elected. The "mainstream media" is more than 70% liberal,and their "reporting" shows that. 60 Minutes is just the last memorable bad example of that. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
DTJ > wrote in
: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:12:24 GMT, Ken Smith > wrote: > >> Our history of mischief and the undermining of democratic regimes in >>the region is well-documented. These people have good cause to want to >>exact revenge, and we are blind if we don't recognize it. > > Care to elaborate on those democratic regimes you speak of? Please > take the time to differentiate between the democratically elected > governments that you imagine and the regimes we all know were in > power. > I suspect he thinks the recent Iranian elections were "democratic". (except that the candidates were only ones that the religious council approved) Or Mugabe's election being "democratic". -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Roy Shroyer" > wrote in
: > > If the hypothetical invading power called you a terrorist, would you > lay down your arms? Would you call yourself a terrorist in that > situation, or a freedom fighter? Do "freedom fighters" bomb and kill their own people? > > How many car bombs were going off in Iraq before we invaded? How many > international terrorists were in Iraq prior to April 03? Did Iraq > have anything to do with 9/11, wahabbist Muslims, or Al Queda? Are we > occupying that country? Are we building 14 permanent bases there? http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/st...241646,00.html http://www.channelone.com/news/2004/06/19/ap_putin/ http://www.techcentralstation.com/092503F.html http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...0/000/003/378f xyz.asp http://www.nationalreview.com/mccart...0406170840.asp Got news for ya,it's not the Iraqis that are doing the terrorism in Iraq,and yes,it IS terrorism,they bomb and kill their own people,despite an election demonstrating their desire for democracy. Even Al-Zarqari(sp) said that it was so. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
: > > "DTJ" > wrote in message > ... >> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:02:40 -0500, >> (Matthew Russotto) wrote: >> >>>>>> **** them, they are terrorists. >>>>> >>>>> You can **** them. I'd rather see them tried for >>>>>war crimes. If we don't require our leaders to >>>>>adhere to International Law and The Geneva Conventions, >>>>>we're doomed. >>>> >>>>In case you haven't noticed, we are, they aren't. >>> >>>Perhaps we're following the letter of the law, but just barely, with >>>respect to the Guantanemo prisoners. >> >> Maybe, maybe not. I guess it depends on who is there. If they are, >> as I believe, terrorists, I don't give a **** about what we do. If >> they aren't, then yes, it bothers me. > > The problem I see, is we need to be able to say, that prisoner over > there "Ali I kill ya" is a terrorist, and we are going to hold him > based on this or that information, and that we don't have people just > randomly being held without our government being straight up about > what we have on them, and who we have. > > Secret prisoners are not cool in the America I grew up in. > > I am pleased to see that at least we seem to be releasing some > people that there is no case on (Lawyer from Portland for instance) > but I think it should be more clear what is up with our intentions > with each prisoner. > > I have a major problem with US citizens not being given the > rights that are thier birthright, and I have a problem with Gitmo > being used as a long term grey area holding center. > > Notice I have a problem with it *long term* the government needs > the basically **** or get off the pot with these people, get the > information they need and either cut them loose, or try and sentance > them for what they have done. > > Bernard > > > Keeping prisoners in a war is different than keeping suspects for civil wrongdoings. Same goes for terrorism. POWs don't get returned until after the war is over,or a prisoner exchange is negotiated.Since we're dealing with a non-state entity,there can be no negotiations. If the enemy knows you have captured one of theirs having knowledge of their plans,they can change them.If they believe the person was killed,then they may not change their plans. -- Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American Car Makes | Dave Lister | Driving | 125 | June 22nd 05 05:05 AM |
bin laden drives a stang | [email protected] | Ford Mustang | 2 | April 24th 05 03:53 PM |
"American" TV media cover up CIA_Israeli torture | Awake | BMW | 7 | February 26th 05 02:44 PM |
American cars | Dave | Antique cars | 6 | February 13th 05 04:27 PM |
American cars | Dave | General | 6 | February 13th 05 04:27 PM |