If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Awake" > wrote in message news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous... > > No one but you suggested that the planes were not real. Are you saying that "THEY" crashed the planes AND planted explosives to bring down the towers? > > The planes did not touch Building Seven. > > Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was > and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a > building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers > before it came down. I don't know about Building Seven. Tell me please. > > Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish > torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings > do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire? Did you notice that they didn't crash a plane into it? > > You never heard of Kristina Borjesson until now, so obviously that is not > a problem. Good conspiracy logic. > > Dead bodies can cause concern, especially when the > "news" media are discovered not reporting them. > > Killing people is the last resort of a dictatorship in trouble. > >>> The book is widely available in libraries in America. >>> It is widely available because they understand that >>> Americans do not read such books and all avenues >>> for discussing this and any book like it on TV are closed >>> off. >> >>Yeah, they can pull of 911 and get a reporter fired, but can't keep a book >>of the shelves. Are you REALLY THAT STUPID? > > > It works so much better when the book is available but they manage > to keep people from reading it anyway. This way they can claim that > "free speech" exists. How do they do this? Is it always "out on loan"? > |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
"Bradburn Fentress" > wrote in message ... > > "tech27" > wrote in message > o.verio.net... > >> Because the poster is being sought by the mental institution he escaped >> from. > > Hey tech,....you've got to stop feeding the animals :^) > Yeah, I know. It only happened because I was paying tribute to Hunter S. Thompson. I drank a quart of tequila, did some mescaline, heroin, and adrenochrome, then got on the ng. I was so wasted I could only respond to simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-' |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Noam Chomsky has very specific views (some of which I strongly disagree
with) but here I find myself in some agreement. However, he does insult Churchill, perhaps unintentionally because he has a little understanding of wartime Britain. DAS For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling --- "Awake" > wrote in message news:PLUZWCUI38413.9844560185@anonymous... [...] > > - - - > "The operative concept of democracy is revealed very clearly in other > ways as well. Perhaps the most extraordinary was the distinction > between Old and New Europe in the run-up to the Iraq war. The criterion > for membership was so clear that it took real discipline to miss it. Old > Europe -the bad guys- were the governments that took the same stand > as the large majority of the population. New Europe -the exciting hope for > a democratic future- were the Churchillian leaders like Berlusconi and > Aznar who disregarded even larger majorities of the population and > submissively took their orders from Crawford, Texas. The most dramatic > case was Turkey, where, to everyone's surprise, the government actually > followed the will of 95 percent of the population. The official > administration > moderate, Colin Powell, immediately announced harsh punishment for this > crime. Turkey was bitterly condemned in the national press for lacking > 'democratic credentials'. The most extreme example was Paul Wolfowitz, > who berated the Turkish military for not compelling the government to > follow > Washington's orders and demanded that they apologize and publicly > recognize > that the goal of a properly functioning democracy is to help the U.S." > - Noam Chomsky, Z-Magazine, Feb 2005 > > > > -=- > This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services. > > > > |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Let me get this straight.
You are suggesting that the planes crashing into the twin towers and the plane crashing into the Pentagon, and the plane crashing into a Pennsylvania (I think that's where it was) field were not 'real' events? All a put-up job by 'insiders'? If so, I must say you make some good ones and some not so good ones... DAS For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling --- "Awake" > wrote in message news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous... > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, "tech27" > wrote: [..] > > No one but you suggested that the planes were not real. > > The planes did not touch Building Seven. > > Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was > and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a > building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers > before it came down. > > Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish > torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings > do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire? [...] |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Points, that is.
DAS For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling --- "Dori A Schmetterling" > wrote in message ... > Let me get this straight. > > You are suggesting that the planes crashing into the twin towers and the > plane crashing into the Pentagon, and the plane crashing into a > Pennsylvania (I think that's where it was) field were not 'real' events? > All a put-up job by 'insiders'? > > If so, I must say you make some good ones and some not so good ones... > > DAS > > For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling > --- > > "Awake" > wrote in message > news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous... >> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, "tech27" > wrote: > [..] >> >> No one but you suggested that the planes were not real. >> >> The planes did not touch Building Seven. >> >> Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was >> and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a >> building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers >> before it came down. >> >> Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish >> torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings >> do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire? > > [...] > > |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
tech27 wrote:
I was so wasted I could only respond to > simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-' > > > I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts... |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
> I was so wasted I could only respond to
> > simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-' > > > > > > > > > I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts... Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to the group. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
"Erich" > wrote in message ... >> I was so wasted I could only respond to >> > simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-' >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts... > > Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to the > group. Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference with me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also post corrections to ill informed advice. When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I stay out of it. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
> >> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...
> > > > Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to the > > group. > > Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing > around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference with > me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also > post corrections to ill informed advice. > When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I > stay out of it. No, I was referring to Whisper. Go easy on the Tequila. :-) |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
"Erich" > wrote in message ... >> >> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts... >> > >> > Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to > the >> > group. >> >> Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing >> around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference > with >> me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also >> post corrections to ill informed advice. >> When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I >> stay out of it. > > No, I was referring to Whisper. Go easy on the Tequila. :-) > Sorry. Switching to Lite Beer. > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
They do exist. | 83 CJ | Jeep | 1 | January 22nd 05 03:54 AM |
Does this BMW exist? | Verizon User | BMW | 6 | October 6th 04 04:35 PM |