"Al Qaeda" does not exist

"Awake" > wrote in message
news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous...

>
> No one but you suggested that the planes were not real.

Are you saying that "THEY" crashed the planes AND planted explosives to
bring down the towers?
>
> The planes did not touch Building Seven.
>
> Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was
> and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a
> building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers
> before it came down.

I don't know about Building Seven. Tell me please.

>
> Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish
> torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings
> do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire?

Did you notice that they didn't crash a plane into it?
>
> You never heard of Kristina Borjesson until now, so obviously that is not
> a problem.

Good conspiracy logic.
>
> Dead bodies can cause concern, especially when the
> "news" media are discovered not reporting them.
>
> Killing people is the last resort of a dictatorship in trouble.
>
>>> The book is widely available in libraries in America.
>>> It is widely available because they understand that
>>> Americans do not read such books and all avenues
>>> for discussing this and any book like it on TV are closed
>>> off.
>>
>>Yeah, they can pull of 911 and get a reporter fired, but can't keep a book
>>of the shelves. Are you REALLY THAT STUPID?
>
>
> It works so much better when the book is available but they manage
> to keep people from reading it anyway. This way they can claim that
> "free speech" exists.

How do they do this? Is it always "out on loan"?
>

"Bradburn Fentress" > wrote in message
...
>
> "tech27" > wrote in message
> o.verio.net...
>
>> Because the poster is being sought by the mental institution he escaped
>> from.
>
> Hey tech,....you've got to stop feeding the animals :^)
>

Yeah, I know. It only happened because I was paying tribute to Hunter S.
Thompson. I drank a quart of tequila, did some mescaline, heroin, and
adrenochrome, then got on the ng. I was so wasted I could only respond to
simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-'

Noam Chomsky has very specific views (some of which I strongly disagree
with) but here I find myself in some agreement. However, he does insult
Churchill, perhaps unintentionally because he has a little understanding of
wartime Britain.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Awake" > wrote in message
news:PLUZWCUI38413.9844560185@anonymous...
[...]
>
> - - -
> "The operative concept of democracy is revealed very clearly in other
> ways as well. Perhaps the most extraordinary was the distinction
> between Old and New Europe in the run-up to the Iraq war. The criterion
> for membership was so clear that it took real discipline to miss it. Old
> Europe -the bad guys- were the governments that took the same stand
> as the large majority of the population. New Europe -the exciting hope for
> a democratic future- were the Churchillian leaders like Berlusconi and
> Aznar who disregarded even larger majorities of the population and
> submissively took their orders from Crawford, Texas. The most dramatic
> case was Turkey, where, to everyone's surprise, the government actually
> followed the will of 95 percent of the population. The official
> administration
> moderate, Colin Powell, immediately announced harsh punishment for this
> crime. Turkey was bitterly condemned in the national press for lacking
> 'democratic credentials'. The most extreme example was Paul Wolfowitz,
> who berated the Turkish military for not compelling the government to
> follow
> Washington's orders and demanded that they apologize and publicly
> recognize
> that the goal of a properly functioning democracy is to help the U.S."
> - Noam Chomsky, Z-Magazine, Feb 2005
>
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>

Let me get this straight.

You are suggesting that the planes crashing into the twin towers and the
plane crashing into the Pentagon, and the plane crashing into a Pennsylvania
(I think that's where it was) field were not 'real' events? All a put-up
job by 'insiders'?

If so, I must say you make some good ones and some not so good ones...

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Awake" > wrote in message
news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous...
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, "tech27" > wrote:
[..]
>
> No one but you suggested that the planes were not real.
>
> The planes did not touch Building Seven.
>
> Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was
> and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a
> building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers
> before it came down.
>
> Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish
> torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings
> do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire?

[...]

Points, that is.

DAS

For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
---

"Dori A Schmetterling" > wrote in message
...
> Let me get this straight.
>
> You are suggesting that the planes crashing into the twin towers and the
> plane crashing into the Pentagon, and the plane crashing into a
> Pennsylvania (I think that's where it was) field were not 'real' events?
> All a put-up job by 'insiders'?
>
> If so, I must say you make some good ones and some not so good ones...
>
> DAS
>
> For direct contact replace nospam with schmetterling
> ---
>
> "Awake" > wrote in message
> news:SW0A94D238414.3001851852@anonymous...
>> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, "tech27" > wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> No one but you suggested that the planes were not real.
>>
>> The planes did not touch Building Seven.
>>
>> Since you are so intelligent, explain what Building Seven was
>> and how exactly it came to collapse pancake style, just as a
>> building brought down by demolitions does, just as the two towers
>> before it came down.
>>
>> Did you notice the same type of structure which the Spanish
>> torched a week ago to show the world that such buildings
>> do not collapse in 9-11 fashion due to fire?
>
> [...]
>
>

tech27 wrote:
I was so wasted I could only respond to
> simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-'
>
>
>


I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...

> I was so wasted I could only respond to
> > simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-'
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...

Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to the
group.

"Erich" > wrote in message
...
>> I was so wasted I could only respond to
>> > simple posts that required little or no brain activity to address. (-'
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...
>
> Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to the
> group.

Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing
around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference with
me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also
post corrections to ill informed advice.
When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I
stay out of it.

> >> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...
> >
> > Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to
the
> > group.
>
> Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing
> around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference
with
> me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also
> post corrections to ill informed advice.
> When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I
> stay out of it.

No, I was referring to Whisper. Go easy on the Tequila. :-)

"Erich" > wrote in message
...
>> >> I know how you feel. That describes 95% of all rst posts...
>> >
>> > Which coincidentally is the same percentage as your "contributions" to
> the
>> > group.
>>
>> Are you being sarcastic? Sorry if I've misunderstood, but besides goofing
>> around I have posted LOTS of informative responses. The only difference
> with
>> me is that I only post advice when I know what I'm talking about. I also
>> post corrections to ill informed advice.
>> When there is nothing asked about which I can offer intelligent advice I
>> stay out of it.
>
> No, I was referring to Whisper. Go easy on the Tequila. :-)
>
Sorry. Switching to Lite Beer.
>