A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Chrysler
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

300c Hurst!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 12th 04, 12:01 AM
James C. Reeves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
n.umich.edu...
| On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, James C. Reeves wrote:
|
| > | I think that this thing is meant to have a bridesmaid effect. The
| > | bridesmaids at weddings wear hideous dresses so that the bride looks
| > | beautiful. The Hurst is painted in horrible colors to make a regular 300
| > | looks good.
|
| > Well, if that what it takes. ;-)
|
| Better this than what GM had to resort to when nobody bought Pontiac
| Azteks...they practically gave the ugly pieces of **** to their employees
| so the Azteks would appear on the road to give the illusion of market
| acceptance.

Well the Aztec sells better than the GTO does!

But I agree, the Aztec is about as ugly as they come. Perhaps they need to try
this bridesmaid effect too!


Ads
  #22  
Old November 12th 04, 01:26 AM
RPhillips47
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"James C. Reeves" wrote:

>Well the Aztec sells better than the GTO does!


Yeah - that is something for Pontiac to really be proud of!
  #23  
Old November 12th 04, 01:26 AM
RPhillips47
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"James C. Reeves" wrote:

>Well the Aztec sells better than the GTO does!


Yeah - that is something for Pontiac to really be proud of!
  #24  
Old November 14th 04, 09:27 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:46:51 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
> wrote:


>Better this than what GM had to resort to when nobody bought Pontiac
>Azteks...they practically gave the ugly pieces of **** to their employees
>so the Azteks would appear on the road to give the illusion of market
>acceptance.


They remind me of dough mixers in bakeries.
If one is in front of me, (unlikely since Pontiac drivers speed)
I can imagine the cover lifting, rotating blades stopping,
and clunk, throwing out 200 pounds of dough for the missing
table.

Kind of like the Japanese brand of car that had a "ATM"
in the tailgate 15-20 years ago.

  #25  
Old November 14th 04, 09:27 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:46:51 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
> wrote:


>Better this than what GM had to resort to when nobody bought Pontiac
>Azteks...they practically gave the ugly pieces of **** to their employees
>so the Azteks would appear on the road to give the illusion of market
>acceptance.


They remind me of dough mixers in bakeries.
If one is in front of me, (unlikely since Pontiac drivers speed)
I can imagine the cover lifting, rotating blades stopping,
and clunk, throwing out 200 pounds of dough for the missing
table.

Kind of like the Japanese brand of car that had a "ATM"
in the tailgate 15-20 years ago.

  #28  
Old November 16th 04, 08:04 AM
marlinspike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IMHO the 300C looks pretty damn good...this thing on the other hand...Still
though, 500hp 300, Tim Allen would do a line in honor of this.
Richard
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message
...
> Gee thanks! I just barfed all over my keyboard. I didn't think it was
> possible to make the 300 uglier! I was wrong!
>
>



  #29  
Old November 16th 04, 08:04 AM
marlinspike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

IMHO the 300C looks pretty damn good...this thing on the other hand...Still
though, 500hp 300, Tim Allen would do a line in honor of this.
Richard
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message
...
> Gee thanks! I just barfed all over my keyboard. I didn't think it was
> possible to make the 300 uglier! I was wrong!
>
>



  #30  
Old November 16th 04, 01:22 PM
Nate Nagel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Behnke wrote:

> http://www.valvoline.com/carcare/art...=pht200409013h
> http://www.jalopnik.com/cars/custom-...300-024876.php
>
> http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler300c
> http://www.dodgeboy.net/news/300churst/index.htm
> http://motortrend.com/autoshows/coverage/112_04_sema/


So the real question is, does it actually have a manual transmixer?
It's called a "Hurst" for ****'s sake but nobody is saying anything
about the tranny!

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300C vs Monaro vs Jag S Dori A Schmetterling Chrysler 58 November 1st 04 05:30 PM
300C Production in Europe----kind of long [email protected] Chrysler 0 October 31st 04 07:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.