If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tucson: America's Most Courteous City
"Scott en Aztlán" wrote:
> > In the past I've related how drivers in Tucson are more "courteous" > than drivers in other cities. They are constantly doing things like > stopping to allow someone to pull out of a shopping center driveway in > front of them (oblivious to the fact that they are needlessly delaying > 50 other cars that are stuck in the ane behind them). > > Yesterday, some "good samaritan" in an SUV was stopped at a 4-way stop > on the University of Arizona campus. Instead of proceeding when his > turn came, he remained stopped and waved on not one but TWO > pedalcyclists, one coming from the left and one from the right. BOTH > were riding on the sidewalk, and BOTH had stop signs, but Mr. Nice Guy > waved them on through. Meanwhile, I and several other vehicles were > stacked up behind. I was riding my bike as fast as I could in order to make a sharp left turn across the 50-foot-wide median strip and continue on. There is a 20-foot difference in elevation between the lanes so the hill between is pretty steep. If I can't get up full speed I have to shift down into my granny to make it. This happens most frequently when cars coming from the other direction make left turns down their side of the cross-median road and just sit there waiting for me to pass, making me slow down and shift in order to pass in front of them and THEN make the turn. Since I am zipping diagonally across the three travel lanes heading to the cross-median lanes, only the very stupid could have any doubt about my intentions. But yesterday a real jewel saw what was happening and immediately finished his turn before I got there, thereby speeding both of us on our way. I have to believe he was a bicyclist himself and understood the problem. Don't bother drawing a diagram, just be happy for me! Every once in a while something happens that convinces me that the human race is not totally doomed. -- Cheers, Bev ------------------------------------------------------------- "We've got some stupid people out there. This morning, I woke up in a bathtub filled with ice and I had an extra kidney." |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"The Real Bev" > wrote in message ... > "Scott en Aztlán" wrote: >> >> In the past I've related how drivers in Tucson are more "courteous" >> than drivers in other cities. They are constantly doing things like >> stopping to allow someone to pull out of a shopping center driveway in >> front of them (oblivious to the fact that they are needlessly delaying >> 50 other cars that are stuck in the ane behind them). >> >> Yesterday, some "good samaritan" in an SUV was stopped at a 4-way stop >> on the University of Arizona campus. Instead of proceeding when his >> turn came, he remained stopped and waved on not one but TWO >> pedalcyclists, one coming from the left and one from the right. BOTH >> were riding on the sidewalk, and BOTH had stop signs, but Mr. Nice Guy >> waved them on through. Meanwhile, I and several other vehicles were >> stacked up behind. > > I was riding my bike as fast as I could in order to make a sharp left > turn across the 50-foot-wide median strip and continue on. There is a > 20-foot difference in elevation between the lanes so the hill between is > pretty steep. If I can't get up full speed I have to shift down into my > granny to make it. This happens most frequently when cars coming from > the other direction make left turns down their side of the cross-median > road and just sit there waiting for me to pass, making me slow down and > shift in order to pass in front of them and THEN make the turn. Since I > am zipping diagonally across the three travel lanes heading to the > cross-median lanes, only the very stupid could have any doubt about my > intentions. > > But yesterday a real jewel saw what was happening and immediately > finished his turn before I got there, thereby speeding both of us on our > way. I have to believe he was a bicyclist himself and understood the > problem. > > Don't bother drawing a diagram, just be happy for me! Every once in a > while something happens that convinces me that the human race is not > totally doomed. > > -- > Cheers, > Bev > ------------------------------------------------------------- > "We've got some stupid people out there. This morning, I woke > up in a bathtub filled with ice and I had an extra kidney." The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden don't know what actions will occur next. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"The Real Bev" > wrote in message ... > "Scott en Aztlán" wrote: >> >> In the past I've related how drivers in Tucson are more "courteous" >> than drivers in other cities. They are constantly doing things like >> stopping to allow someone to pull out of a shopping center driveway in >> front of them (oblivious to the fact that they are needlessly delaying >> 50 other cars that are stuck in the ane behind them). >> >> Yesterday, some "good samaritan" in an SUV was stopped at a 4-way stop >> on the University of Arizona campus. Instead of proceeding when his >> turn came, he remained stopped and waved on not one but TWO >> pedalcyclists, one coming from the left and one from the right. BOTH >> were riding on the sidewalk, and BOTH had stop signs, but Mr. Nice Guy >> waved them on through. Meanwhile, I and several other vehicles were >> stacked up behind. > > I was riding my bike as fast as I could in order to make a sharp left > turn across the 50-foot-wide median strip and continue on. There is a > 20-foot difference in elevation between the lanes so the hill between is > pretty steep. If I can't get up full speed I have to shift down into my > granny to make it. This happens most frequently when cars coming from > the other direction make left turns down their side of the cross-median > road and just sit there waiting for me to pass, making me slow down and > shift in order to pass in front of them and THEN make the turn. Since I > am zipping diagonally across the three travel lanes heading to the > cross-median lanes, only the very stupid could have any doubt about my > intentions. > > But yesterday a real jewel saw what was happening and immediately > finished his turn before I got there, thereby speeding both of us on our > way. I have to believe he was a bicyclist himself and understood the > problem. > > Don't bother drawing a diagram, just be happy for me! Every once in a > while something happens that convinces me that the human race is not > totally doomed. > > -- > Cheers, > Bev > ------------------------------------------------------------- > "We've got some stupid people out there. This morning, I woke > up in a bathtub filled with ice and I had an extra kidney." The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden don't know what actions will occur next. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > > The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will > occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People > should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and > concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people > delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden > don't know what actions will occur next. That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to react to their un-expected maneuvers. Bernard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message ... > > The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will > occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People > should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and > concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people > delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden > don't know what actions will occur next. That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to react to their un-expected maneuvers. Bernard |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bernard Farquart wrote:
> > "James C. Reeves" > wrote: > > > > The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will > > occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People > > should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and > > concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people > > delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden > > don't know what actions will occur next. > > That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes > someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait > when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to > react to their un-expected maneuvers. I try to ALWAYS be predictible no matter how many wheels I'm using at the time. Does this give me the right to shout truly foul things at the false-courtesy jerks? Hisband thinks I should just say thank you and move along. I think I should NEVER get in front of anybody that stupid and that yelling at them is perfectly OK as long as I don't actually strike them. -- Cheers, Bev ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Rule 18: Always tip your hat before striking a lady. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bernard Farquart wrote:
> > "James C. Reeves" > wrote: > > > > The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will > > occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People > > should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and > > concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people > > delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden > > don't know what actions will occur next. > > That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes > someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait > when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to > react to their un-expected maneuvers. I try to ALWAYS be predictible no matter how many wheels I'm using at the time. Does this give me the right to shout truly foul things at the false-courtesy jerks? Hisband thinks I should just say thank you and move along. I think I should NEVER get in front of anybody that stupid and that yelling at them is perfectly OK as long as I don't actually strike them. -- Cheers, Bev ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ Rule 18: Always tip your hat before striking a lady. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in message news:fTNvd.5547$mn6.1805@trnddc07... > > "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message > ... >> >> The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will >> occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People >> should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and >> concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects >> confusion....people delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. >> People all of a sudden don't know what actions will occur next. > > That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes > someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait > when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to > react to their un-expected maneuvers. > > Bernard > Boy did I have a typo in that one! "Right-away"? Glad everyone knew I meant "right-of-way". Those brain farts are killers! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in message news:fTNvd.5547$mn6.1805@trnddc07... > > "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message > ... >> >> The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will >> occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People >> should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and >> concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects >> confusion....people delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. >> People all of a sudden don't know what actions will occur next. > > That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes > someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait > when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to > react to their un-expected maneuvers. > > Bernard > Boy did I have a typo in that one! "Right-away"? Glad everyone knew I meant "right-of-way". Those brain farts are killers! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article >, The Real Bev wrote:
> I was riding my bike as fast as I could in order to make a sharp left > turn across the 50-foot-wide median strip and continue on. There is a > 20-foot difference in elevation between the lanes so the hill between is > pretty steep. If I can't get up full speed I have to shift down into my > granny to make it. This happens most frequently when cars coming from > the other direction make left turns down their side of the cross-median > road and just sit there waiting for me to pass, making me slow down and > shift in order to pass in front of them and THEN make the turn. Since I > am zipping diagonally across the three travel lanes heading to the > cross-median lanes, only the very stupid could have any doubt about my > intentions. The "consideration" idiots really aggrivate me when I am riding a bicycle. I know how to ride in traffic and have things timed so I don't have to scrub off speed, etc and so forth. Instead of driving normally as I expect, they start to do strange things in the name of being "considerate". Usually this forces me to slow/stop/evaluate what they are doing, then sometimes needing to wave them on their way because their "consideration" is making it dangerous for me proceed. Makes things worse for me and everybody else on the road. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tucson Antique Car Driving | Luke | Antique cars | 2 | February 9th 04 10:03 AM |
FYI: Trip from TUCSON, Az. to KATY, Tx. on ~1-Oct. | Whiskey-409 | Antique cars | 1 | September 24th 03 07:15 AM |