Europe Loves The Mustang

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:40:51 GMT, the guvnor
> wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:46:36 -0400, ZombyWoof >
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:29:45 -0400, G > wrote
>>something wonderfully witty:
>>
>>>If Europe " loves the Mustang " it's because it's cheap.
>>>
>>Cheap is relative to others in the class. Right now the Europeans
>>don't really have anything to compete against it at its price point
>>even with tariffs & VAT. Plus it is American muscle admired and
>>lusted for since the very first version back in `64.
>
>Admired and lusted over for it's van style suspension?

We have been over this before but I guess those fat cells in your head
prevented any of the information from sinking in. Ford makes a GT and
Mach 1 with solid rear ends because these cars were designed for
quarter mile drag racing. The Mustang Cobra has independent
suspension for people who like to drive on the tight curves of rural
roads. Unlike Europeon trash cars, most of which reside in your junk
yard, we have a choice of the kind of muscle car or sports car we want
to buy depending on what we want to do with it.
>
>Ever wondered why that despite being cheap and nasty, American cars
>still don't sell?

Really? How many Ford Tarus sedans could you miss on the road if you
threw a rock outside that South Wales junk yard full of rusty
Mercedes. Do you stupid ****ing limey ******s have any domestic car
companies left in Blighty outside of Bentley and Rolls? But the real
question here is why do you even care Nicky? About the only thing on
wheels you could squeeze your fat ass into is an ox cart and at that
it would take a team of Budweiser Clydesdales to get it in motion.

"America the Beautiful" > wrote in message
...
> Actually, I remember the figures being more like 20 miles,

Don't hold us accountable for your bad memory Chris!

> but anyway, when you are talking about a country as large as Canada with
> vast majority of people living within a short driving distance from the
> border, 100 miles means spit!

Chris, it's evident that you didn't spend much (if any) time in school, or
you'd know that historically when both Canada and the U.S. were being
settled, towns and cities were founded on the shores of major banks and
rivers. The fact that a large percentage of Canadians live so close to the
U.S. has more to do with "The Great Lakes" (Did you ever hear of The Great
Lakes Chris?) than a burning desire to live close to the U.S. border. Get
the connection Chris? No? Well let me spell it out for you Chris - it was
all about transportation! Duh!

>
>> Get back to the trailer park Larry The Frog!
>
> it figures how all you sports car nuts have something stupid to say. Proof
> that you brains are about as big as your cocks.

What is it with the gay community's preoccupation with the male anatomy?
Penis envy will get you nowwhere Chris.

>Read a book or two and buy the pump.

It's clear what you read Chris and kiddie porn isn't acceptable in Canada
Chris.

>
> --
> Chris F.
> Long Island.
>
> "A country soars its highest when it soars on the Wings of Freedom."
> God Bless America.

"Larry J." > wrote in message
...
>> Typical mouth breather response. 10 miles - 100 miles - what's
>> the difference? Get back to the trailer park Larry The Frog!
>
> So I see you've got nothing but insults as your response to the
> truth.

First of all, that wasn't intended as an insult. Is not your name posted in
your NG I.D. as "Larry The Frog"? I didn't post that name, you did!

What truth was that Larry? Surely you aren't still sticking to the claim
that 90% of Canadians live within 10 miles of the border???!!! You are
indeed as dumb as a post! Is it so hard to admit that you are wrong?

>
> --
> Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail
>
> The United States is the greatest country in the world..!
> Twenty-five million illegal aliens can't be wrong.

Ken Ehrett wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:26:37 GMT, the guvnor
> > wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:15:35 GMT, "Larry J."
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Waiving the right to remain silent, the guvnor
> said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:24:31 -0500, "Joel Jacobs"
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Yurop has never played fair with auto imports from the US.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Note how the US car market is closed to true competition due
>>>>>>to your fedralisation rules.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Improve your friggin' build quality on cars other than the
>>>>>Rolls, and Americans might well buy your cars - IF you build
>>>>>them to world standards of crash worthiness. I loved Rover, but
>>>>>Rovers - other than the old Land Rovers - were pieces of crap.
>>>>>AND, your cars are expensive! Parts were expensive, a decent
>>>>>mechanic was hardly ever to be found.
>>>>
>>>>An American crying about car build quality???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I don't think you realize just how large this country is.
>>>>
>>>>Smaller than Russia, Canada and China.
>>>
>>>How about marketwise..?
>>
>>The Russians have more oil, the Canadians more timber and China
>>dominated world manufacturing.
>>
>>What is it that you people do?
>
>
> The Russians need our technology to locate, drill and pump their oil
> out of the ground in the severe weather conditions of Siberia.
>
> Ninety percent of Canaduh's population lives within 10 miles of the US
> Border and most of them work for US owned companies.
>
> China does not manufacture much of anything. What they really do is
> assemble products that are shipped to them and then ship back the
> finished product.

Like american spy planes?

--
"The Brits are bad at everything, including butt shagging." Larry comes
to terms with rejection 20 may 2005

"All women have balls, inbred." Trikkksie concludes why all american
women are ugly 21 May 2005

"suck on my balls", "Yes, call me Alan." confirms ugly Sarah.

Waiving the right to remain silent, "StingRay"
> said:

> "Larry J." > wrote in message
> ...
>>> Typical mouth breather response. 10 miles - 100 miles - what's
>>> the difference? Get back to the trailer park Larry The Frog!
>>
>> So I see you've got nothing but insults as your response to the
>> truth.
>
> First of all, that wasn't intended as an insult. Is not your
> name posted in your NG I.D. as "Larry The Frog"? I didn't post
> that name, you did!

I know what's in my headers. I put it there. The "moutbreather"
commet was the insult, you idiot.

> What truth was that Larry? Surely you aren't still sticking to
> the claim that 90% of Canadians live within 10 miles of the
> border???!!! You are indeed as dumb as a post! Is it so hard to
> admit that you are wrong?

Obviously, you didn't bother to read what I wrote. FOAD.

--
Larry J. - Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to e-mail

The United States is the greatest country in the world..!
Twenty-five million illegal aliens can't be wrong.

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:41:40 -0500, "Joel Jacobs" >
wrote:

>I'm killfiling the whole mess....

That's probably your best move, Chief Petty Officer considering your
previous comments were, to be polite, "exaggerated claims".

Quoting CPO Jacobs: " After all the bombs are dropped and all the
missiles shot someone still has to go in and take possession with
boots on the ground. "

No one will bother to go in " with boots " Chief Petty Officer because
the whole place will be radiated. What would be the point?

As I suggested to you before, leave the details of global
strategic defense to the experts.

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:59:43 -0400, ZombyWoof >
wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:46:29 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
>wrote something wonderfully witty:
>
>>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:27:27 GMT, the guvnor
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:12:43 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>By 2015, the bank predicts, "Chinese consumers will likely have
>>>>>displaced US consumers as the primary engine of global economic
>>>>>growth."
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/stor...509375,00.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Doesn't fit any definition of "Hyperpower " I've ever read....
>>>>
>>>>"A hyperpower is a powerful country that is vastly stronger than any
>>>>potential rival.
>>>
>>>See China's domination of world trade.
>>
>>>>Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has
>>>>been the world's only superpower.
>>>>
>>>>The unique position of the United States (at least in terms of
>>>>military force)
>>>
>>>See America not even being able to win the Vietnam war.
>>
>>Let me know when you have any hard facts to support your contention
>>that China is a hyperpower.
>>---
>Well they do have a certain level of power since the are a nuclear
>nation and the people are a little hyper in their attempts to eek out
>an existence as a subsidence farmer.

Go look up " Hyperpower".

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 02:00:58 -0400, ZombyWoof >
wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:32:07 GMT, "Larry J."
> wrote something wonderfully witty:
>
>>Waiving the right to remain silent, the guvnor
> said:
>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:12:43 -0400, Sarah Czepiel
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>By 2015, the bank predicts, "Chinese consumers will likely have
>>>>>displaced US consumers as the primary engine of global economic
>>>>>growth."
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/china/stor...509375,00.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Doesn't fit any definition of "Hyperpower " I've ever read....
>>>>
>>>>"A hyperpower is a powerful country that is vastly stronger than
>>>>any potential rival.
>>>
>>> See China's domination of world trade.
>>
>>Where does that leave a third-rate hovel like engleland..? Fourth-
>>rate, perhaps..?
>>
>All depends, as Argentina taken any of their sheep farming Islands
>lately?

If the Arggies make the grab again lets hope the Brits can get back
there on their own without our help.

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 07:02:51 -0400, America the Beautiful
> wrote:

>
>
>the guvnor wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 01:46:36 -0400, ZombyWoof >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 20:29:45 -0400, G > wrote
>>>something wonderfully witty:
>>>
>>>
>>>>If Europe " loves the Mustang " it's because it's cheap.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Cheap is relative to others in the class. Right now the Europeans
>>>don't really have anything to compete against it at its price point
>>>even with tariffs & VAT. Plus it is American muscle admired and
>>>lusted for since the very first version back in `64.
>>
>>
>> Admired and lusted over for it's van style suspension?
>>
>> Ever wondered why that despite being cheap and nasty, American cars
>> still don't sell?
>
>Somebody's buying them.....

Guvnor's favorite car cover....
http://img82.echo.cx/img82/9456/norespect1rk.jpg


>"American Adventure"
>http://www.mocgb.net/Photos/_America...e05/index.html

Very nice. Love the yellow '67 hardtop. This show had quite a
variety...a pair of '69 Mach 1's, a Saleen , several Fox body LX's,
plus some newer SN95's. And I thought I caught a glimpse of a
McLaren.

Kenshlock de la Fehrêtte wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 23:55:37 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
> wrote:
>
>
>>To recap:
>>
>>I...
>>...don't know anything
>
>
> Whatever Whiskers, whatever

Now the crusty old **** thinks she knows more about the Chinese military
than someone from someone who worked in the military. Next, she'll argue
against Steven Hawking over elementary mathematics.

--
"The Brits are bad at everything, including butt shagging." Larry comes
to terms with rejection 20 may 2005

"All women have balls, inbred." Trikkksie concludes why all american
women are ugly 21 May 2005

"suck on my balls", "Yes, call me Alan." confirms ugly Sarah.