yall missed me!!!!!! i feel so loved!!!!!

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> RPhillips47 wrote:
>>
>>> "maxpower" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
>>>> asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she had
>>> to agree
>>> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought a
>>> Toyota
>>> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really
>>> something and I do
>>> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time
>>> which started
>>> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling
>>> shocks that
>>> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the restriction
>>> on the
>>> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually
>>> buried me
>>> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering such a
>>> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
>>> forward.
>>> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C I
>>> would be
>>> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
>>> it...................................
>>>
>>> RP
>>
>>
>>
>> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
>> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
>> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i
>> know nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) , and
>> called names ( typical stupid ****) and accused of being related to
>> someone ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some
>> asshole you named Charlene....
>
>
> So why are you back? :-)
>
>
> Matt
>
i missed you, Matt.. i want to be among those who disagree with you.. i
want to read Daniel's wonderfully worded put downs of idiots. but most
of all, i missed you, Matt... and Ted, and Deadbeat, and missed being
called mean names, when i don't deserve it and when i simply asked a
question and the only one who gave me an answer that reasonably
qualified as an answer was Daniel..

so why are you glad to have me back? i know you are glad...you keep
replying...

you love me, you really love me (quote by sally field, not mine)

Didnt she start running off at the mouth about her Bendix10 brake system?
Thats when i got caught up in her mess,I think she was the one that made me
stop posting to all the bull, sorta what this person is trying to do now,
who ever she is
"RPhillips47" > wrote in message
...
> "maxpower" wrote:
>
> >OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
> >asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>
> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she had to
agree
> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought a
Toyota
> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really something and
I do
> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time which
started
> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling shocks
that
> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the restriction on
the
> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually buried
me
> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering such a
> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
forward.
> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C I would
be
> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
> it...................................
>
> RP

Didnt she start running off at the mouth about her Bendix10 brake system?
Thats when i got caught up in her mess,I think she was the one that made me
stop posting to all the bull, sorta what this person is trying to do now,
who ever she is
"RPhillips47" > wrote in message
...
> "maxpower" wrote:
>
> >OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
> >asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>
> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she had to
agree
> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought a
Toyota
> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really something and
I do
> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time which
started
> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling shocks
that
> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the restriction on
the
> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually buried
me
> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering such a
> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
forward.
> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C I would
be
> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
> it...................................
>
> RP

linda wrote:

> Matt Whiting wrote:
>
>> linda wrote:
>>
>>> RPhillips47 wrote:
>>>
>>>> "maxpower" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
>>>>> asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she
>>>> had to agree
>>>> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought
>>>> a Toyota
>>>> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really
>>>> something and I do
>>>> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time
>>>> which started
>>>> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling
>>>> shocks that
>>>> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the restriction
>>>> on the
>>>> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually
>>>> buried me
>>>> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering such a
>>>> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
>>>> forward.
>>>> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C I
>>>> would be
>>>> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
>>>> it...................................
>>>>
>>>> RP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
>>> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
>>> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i
>>> know nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) , and
>>> called names ( typical stupid ****) and accused of being related to
>>> someone ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some
>>> asshole you named Charlene....
>>
>>
>>
>> So why are you back? :-)
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
> i missed you, Matt.. i want to be among those who disagree with you.. i
> want to read Daniel's wonderfully worded put downs of idiots. but most
> of all, i missed you, Matt... and Ted, and Deadbeat, and missed being
> called mean names, when i don't deserve it and when i simply asked a
> question and the only one who gave me an answer that reasonably
> qualified as an answer was Daniel..
>
> so why are you glad to have me back? i know you are glad...you keep
> replying...
>
> you love me, you really love me (quote by sally field, not mine)
>

I thought your tryst with Danny would last a little longer...


Matt

linda wrote:

> Matt Whiting wrote:
>
>> linda wrote:
>>
>>> RPhillips47 wrote:
>>>
>>>> "maxpower" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
>>>>> asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she
>>>> had to agree
>>>> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought
>>>> a Toyota
>>>> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really
>>>> something and I do
>>>> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time
>>>> which started
>>>> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling
>>>> shocks that
>>>> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the restriction
>>>> on the
>>>> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually
>>>> buried me
>>>> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering such a
>>>> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
>>>> forward.
>>>> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C I
>>>> would be
>>>> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
>>>> it...................................
>>>>
>>>> RP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
>>> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
>>> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i
>>> know nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) , and
>>> called names ( typical stupid ****) and accused of being related to
>>> someone ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some
>>> asshole you named Charlene....
>>
>>
>>
>> So why are you back? :-)
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
> i missed you, Matt.. i want to be among those who disagree with you.. i
> want to read Daniel's wonderfully worded put downs of idiots. but most
> of all, i missed you, Matt... and Ted, and Deadbeat, and missed being
> called mean names, when i don't deserve it and when i simply asked a
> question and the only one who gave me an answer that reasonably
> qualified as an answer was Daniel..
>
> so why are you glad to have me back? i know you are glad...you keep
> replying...
>
> you love me, you really love me (quote by sally field, not mine)
>

I thought your tryst with Danny would last a little longer...


Matt

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>
>>> linda wrote:
>>>
>>>> RPhillips47 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "maxpower" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
>>>>>> asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she
>>>>> had to agree
>>>>> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought
>>>>> a Toyota
>>>>> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really
>>>>> something and I do
>>>>> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time
>>>>> which started
>>>>> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling
>>>>> shocks that
>>>>> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the
>>>>> restriction on the
>>>>> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually
>>>>> buried me
>>>>> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering
>>>>> such a
>>>>> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
>>>>> forward.
>>>>> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C
>>>>> I would be
>>>>> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
>>>>> it...................................
>>>>>
>>>>> RP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
>>>> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
>>>> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i
>>>> know nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) ,
>>>> and called names ( typical stupid ****) and accused of being related
>>>> to someone ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some
>>>> asshole you named Charlene....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So why are you back? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>> i missed you, Matt.. i want to be among those who disagree with you..
>> i want to read Daniel's wonderfully worded put downs of idiots. but
>> most of all, i missed you, Matt... and Ted, and Deadbeat, and missed
>> being called mean names, when i don't deserve it and when i simply
>> asked a question and the only one who gave me an answer that
>> reasonably qualified as an answer was Daniel..
>>
>> so why are you glad to have me back? i know you are glad...you keep
>> replying...
>>
>> you love me, you really love me (quote by sally field, not mine)
>>
>
> I thought your tryst with Danny would last a little longer...
>
>
> Matt
>
you know how it is... when a man turns you down.....:-)

lw

Matt Whiting wrote:
> linda wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting wrote:
>>
>>> linda wrote:
>>>
>>>> RPhillips47 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "maxpower" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> OMG you mentioned Charlene Blake!!! ladies close your ears....what an
>>>>>> asshole she was, but i think she won her case
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If I remember correctly there was some kind of settlement and she
>>>>> had to agree
>>>>> to "silenece" herself - so she did so with Chrysler but then bought
>>>>> a Toyota
>>>>> van and eventually took them on the same way. She was really
>>>>> something and I do
>>>>> not miss the almost daily war I had with her for a period of time
>>>>> which started
>>>>> when I asked a simple question to everyone about the load-leveling
>>>>> shocks that
>>>>> would be available for '96 T&C's, as well as lifting the
>>>>> restriction on the
>>>>> white pearl-coat paint. She came back with an attack that virtually
>>>>> buried me
>>>>> and called me a nincompoop (?) and imbecile for even considering
>>>>> such a
>>>>> vehicle.......and it only went downhill between us from that point
>>>>> forward.
>>>>> What makes it great eight years later is the fact that the '96 T&C
>>>>> I would be
>>>>> foolish in buying is still going strong with close to 185,000 miles on
>>>>> it...................................
>>>>>
>>>>> RP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
>>>> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
>>>> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i
>>>> know nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) ,
>>>> and called names ( typical stupid ****) and accused of being related
>>>> to someone ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some
>>>> asshole you named Charlene....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So why are you back? :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>> i missed you, Matt.. i want to be among those who disagree with you..
>> i want to read Daniel's wonderfully worded put downs of idiots. but
>> most of all, i missed you, Matt... and Ted, and Deadbeat, and missed
>> being called mean names, when i don't deserve it and when i simply
>> asked a question and the only one who gave me an answer that
>> reasonably qualified as an answer was Daniel..
>>
>> so why are you glad to have me back? i know you are glad...you keep
>> replying...
>>
>> you love me, you really love me (quote by sally field, not mine)
>>
>
> I thought your tryst with Danny would last a little longer...
>
>
> Matt
>
you know how it is... when a man turns you down.....:-)

lw

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Mike Hall wrote:
>>
>>>Do you have a self-esteem problem?..
>>>
>>
>>Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.
>
>
> That's pretty good! Your learning!
>
> Ted
>
>
tapping into my inner meanness?

lw

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> "linda" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Mike Hall wrote:
>>
>>>Do you have a self-esteem problem?..
>>>
>>
>>Save your breath. You'll need it to blow up your date.
>
>
> That's pretty good! Your learning!
>
> Ted
>
>
tapping into my inner meanness?

lw

linda wrote:

> i know how you feel, i asked a simple question, "Did anyone have any
> info concerning the hazards associated with the chemicals in the
> deployment of air bags?". no i have now been compared to someone i know
> nothing about, and criticized (for lack of capitalization) , and called
> names ( typical stupid ****)

Now now, Linda - no one here thinks that you are typical. 8^)

and accused of being related to someone
> ("douche bag"). apparently guys are just as bad as some asshole you
> named Charlene....

Getting back to your original question, in all seriousness: Have you
found out why they went with the chemicals that they did. I mean, I
doubt very seriously that the engineers involved in the evolution of the
air bag said to each other one day: "You know guys - this pure nitrogen
inflation gas works well, but it's too safe. We need to come up with
some additonal components that will hurt people and make them sick."
There had to be some technical reason that the other stuff was added -
like maybe to make the proper firing more reliable, or more consistent
over a very broad temperature range, or to prevent material
deterioration - you know - something besides "Lets' make this dangerous
for people". Usually when something that has some known downsides is
incorporated, it's to gain an even greater benefit.

IOW, have you found out what was wrong with using, say, pure nitrogen
that prompted them to improve the operation of the air bags, or have you
considered looking for that info.?

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---