If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Magnulus" > wrote in message ... > > "Larry Bud" > wrote in message > oups.com... >> Yeah, who cares if she spent $60,000 of resources, tied up police from >> real police work, then faked her own kidnapping. > > On the bright side, she turned up alive. So many kidnappings lately the > person hasn't turned up alive. Of course she turned up alive. It wasn't a kidnapping. So the statement is irrelivant. > > I'm just saying, cut the woman some slack. Yes, she should have not > said > she was abducted ,but likely she was very embarassed that she ran away > from > the wedding. > That is hardly a excuse. She definitely need help and I hope she receives it. However the circumstances of her actions need to be reconciled. Others should not pay the costs of her "poor judgment". |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 4 May 2005 20:14:05 -0400, "Magnulus" >
wrote: >> Yeah, who cares if she spent $60,000 of resources, tied up police from >> real police work, then faked her own kidnapping. > > On the bright side, she turned up alive. So many kidnappings lately the >person hasn't turned up alive. Name ONE faked kidnapping where the kidnapee has not turned up alive. > I'm just saying, cut the woman some slack. Thjat's easy to say when the money didn't come out of your pocket. Tell you what: let me waste several thousands of YOUR dollars and let's see how much slack you're willing to cut me. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 04 May 2005 14:16:37 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman"
> wrote: >>>You're not married, or have a girlfriend, eh Scott? You don't seem to like >>>women very much. >> >> WRONG. >> >> Guess you better turn in your Armchair Psychiatrist's license. > >I'm wrong with the former but spot on the money with the latter. WRONG. >How else to explain your referring to virtually any woman you encounter with the C >word? What a stupid conclusion to draw. You know absolutely nothing about the women I encounter; you only know about the stupid ****s I choose to write about on USENET. Only a moron would attempt to extrapolate my general attitude towards women from that ridiculously skewed sample. P.S. My wife thinks you're a dumb ****. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 04 May 2005 14:16:37 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman"
> wrote: >"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message .. . >> On Wed, 04 May 2005 01:40:45 GMT, "Skip Elliott Bowman" >> > wrote: >> >>>"Scott en Aztlán" > wrote in message ... >>>> The hot story of the last couple of days has been the "Runaway MFFY" - >>>> the stupid **** who not only left her fiancee' practically standing at >>>> the altar, but faked her own kidnapping and wasted law enforcement >>>> resources.I prediuct that in a few years this bimbo will be tying up >>>> rush hour traffic on a freeway somewhere while she attempts a drama >>>> queen exit. >>>> >>>> It goes without saying that this dim bulb MUST BE a MFFY driver. >>> >>>You're not married, or have a girlfriend, eh Scott? You don't seem to >>>like >>>women very much. >> >> WRONG. >> >> Guess you better turn in your Armchair Psychiatrist's license. > >I'm wrong with the former but spot on the money with the latter. How else >to explain your referring to virtually any woman you encounter with the C >word? And I wonder how your wife feels about it? > Oh my - I guess maybe I don't like women either because I hadn't even noticed that he invoked "the C word". Why are women so sensitive about the word "****"? They generally don't have a problem calling men "dicks". |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 4 May 2005 20:14:05 -0400, "Magnulus" >
wrote: > >"Larry Bud" > wrote in message roups.com... >> Yeah, who cares if she spent $60,000 of resources, tied up police from >> real police work, then faked her own kidnapping. > > On the bright side, she turned up alive. So many kidnappings lately the >person hasn't turned up alive. > > I'm just saying, cut the woman some slack. I think people would be MORE willing to cut her some slack if she had not called 911 and said she had been kidnapped. She should have called her parents at least to let THEM know she was okay and that she just needed some space or time away alone or ANYTHING, but telling the cops she just escaped her kidnappers. > Yes, she should have not said >she was abducted ,but likely she was very embarassed that she ran away from >the wedding. > And she should have been embarassed. What the hell was she thinking? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article >, Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> Name ONE faked kidnapping where the kidnapee has not turned up alive. Damn, I wish I could remember the details... but there was at least one where the kidnapping was staged by the 'victim' and he ended up dead. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"L Sternn" > wrote in message ... > > Yes, she should have not said > >she was abducted ,but likely she was very embarassed that she ran away from > >the wedding. > > > > And she should have been embarassed. What the hell was she thinking? People run away from marriages all the time, especially when they feel they have nobody to listen to their feelings. Crack a book on psychology and sociology, read up on "ambivalence" and "conformity", that's your homework assignment. Ever wonder why people get so stressed out on Christmas and Thanksgiving? It's because of social pressures. I'm not saying her actions were entirely right, but neither is she a "****" just because she was scared and under pressure. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 5 May 2005 03:34:31 -0400, "Magnulus" >
wrote: > >"L Sternn" > wrote in message .. . >> > Yes, she should have not said >> >she was abducted ,but likely she was very embarassed that she ran away >from >> >the wedding. >> > >> >> And she should have been embarassed. What the hell was she thinking? > > People run away from marriages all the time, especially when they feel >they have nobody to listen to their feelings. And nobody is complaining about that. > I'm not saying her actions were entirely right, but neither is she a >"****" just because she was scared and under pressure. True. She is a **** for lying to the authorities and wasting taxpayer money. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 04 May 2005 19:09:47 -0700, L Sternn > wrote:
>Why are women so sensitive about the word "****"? > >They generally don't have a problem calling men "dicks". Or "dorks." The brits use the word "****" all the time, often in conjunction with the nation's favorite adjective, "bloody." Ironically, the word "bloody" has much more shock value to the average Brit than the word "****" does. I bet if I had called her a "bloody MFFY" I'd have gotten complaints, too. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 05 May 2005 05:44:32 -0500, Scott en Aztl=E1n , said the following=
=20 in rec.autos.driving...=20 > The brits use the word "****" all the time, often in conjunction with > the nation's favorite adjective, "bloody." Ironically, the word > "bloody" has much more shock value to the average Brit than the word > "****" does. I bet if I had called her a "bloody MFFY" I'd have gotten > complaints, too. Only from the more hyper-senitive musicians of the group, Scott... ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MFFY of the Month | Brent P | Driving | 3 | April 1st 05 08:39 AM |
The Most Brazen MFFY Yet | Brent P | Driving | 7 | March 8th 05 07:19 AM |
I Hope That MFFY Peed His Pants | Daniel W. Rouse Jr. | Driving | 10 | February 11th 05 05:25 PM |
Speeding: the fundamental cause of MFFY | Daniel W. Rouse Jr. | Driving | 82 | December 23rd 04 01:10 AM |