Cost of Chrysler financing

"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
...
> PC Medic wrote:
>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 01:35:20 GMT, "Art"
>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Check the ads in your local Sunday newspaper or www.chrysler.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Website requires IE
>>>(security risk).
>>>
>>
>>
>> And your tin-foil hat needs replacing too!
>>
>>
>
> Ah, that's an intelligent response. Any time someone presents an
> unpopular opinion, no matter how absolutely, unimpeachably valid, accuse
> them of being paranoid and the problem will go away.
>

More intelligent than blaming IE every time someone gets a virus or spyware.
IE is only a risk if you let it become one.
And no I am not an IE fan , but do use it regularly on several of my Windows
boxes and in all the years I have been on the internet I can count my
Trojans/viruses on one finger.

Back to our regularly scheduled topic.....

"Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
...
> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
> you would get if you paid cash.
>

Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.

If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
while it was sitting in the bank.

But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.

Ted

"Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
...
> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
> you would get if you paid cash.
>

Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.

If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
while it was sitting in the bank.

But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.

Ted

"Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>
>
> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>
> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
> while it was sitting in the bank.
>
> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>
> Ted

You can always return your tax cut.

"Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>
>
> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>
> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
> while it was sitting in the bank.
>
> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>
> Ted

You can always return your tax cut.

It's the leader he would like to return.


"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" > wrote in message
...
> "Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>>
>> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
>> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
>> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
>> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
>> while it was sitting in the bank.
>>
>> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
>> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
>> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>>
>> Ted
>
> You can always return your tax cut.
>
>

It's the leader he would like to return.


"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" > wrote in message
...
> "Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>>
>> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
>> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
>> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
>> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
>> while it was sitting in the bank.
>>
>> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
>> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
>> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>>
>> Ted
>
> You can always return your tax cut.
>
>

>"Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>>
>> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
>> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
>> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
>> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
>> while it was sitting in the bank.
>>
>> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
>> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
>> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>>
>> Ted
>
>You can always return your tax cut.
>
>
>
>

You should send it to your local FOP lodge, as a donation, in
recompense for your hatred of cops.


God Bless,
Dan'L

("If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third
hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're
around.")

>"Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>>> you would get if you paid cash.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>>
>> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
>> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
>> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
>> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
>> while it was sitting in the bank.
>>
>> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
>> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
>> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>>
>> Ted
>
>You can always return your tax cut.
>
>
>
>

You should send it to your local FOP lodge, as a donation, in
recompense for your hatred of cops.


God Bless,
Dan'L

("If I'm going to reach out to the the Democrats then I need a third
hand.There's no way I'm letting go of my wallet or my gun while they're
around.")

Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

> "Percival P. Cassidy" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>But even zero percent financing "costs": it costs you the rebate that
>>you would get if you paid cash.
>>
>
>
> Actually, it costs you a hell of a lot more than that.
>
> If you save up the $11,000 over 3 years (which you should be able to
> to do if a credit report on you claims you can support an $11,000
> car financed over 3 years) then not only do you get the 'rebate'
> but you get all the interest income you have earned on that money
> while it was sitting in the bank.

True, but with 0% you can also save the money you would have spent on
interest while you're making your payments. Whether or not that adds up
to the rebate...? Also don't forget the opportunity cost of having a
new car now, not three years from now. For someone with a dying old
clunker who can afford the 0% payments and still live within his/her
means but doesn't have enough $$ on hand to pay cash, that's an
excellent deal.

>
> But, I forgot, it's no longer fashionable to spend within your means.
> Our Great Leader what we just reelected showed us that with
> the deficit exploder I mean tax cut, so it must be true.
>

Well, yeah, I have some issues with Bush's financial policy, but that's
a different issue...

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel