If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
"Larry in AZ" > wrote in message .. .
> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Elle" > > said: > >> "Pszemol" > wrote >>> I can hardly imagine what good could come from >>> buying such an old car anyway. Yes, you could probably >>> find a cheap one but it will not be in good condition! >>> You spend a lot of time looking for it, driving around for inspections >>> spending money and time to find one. >> >> Folks who know nothing about automotive engine systems >> should not buy such old cars. >> >> Those who know these cars and have the time to work on them >> stand to save a lot of money. > > It's the kind of car you get for your young son, and let him fix it up for > the fun and experience. It's not a serious daily-driver for anyone. That was exactly my feeling about it. I would not take my family for a ride in anything '89 especially if I did not owned it for the last 10 years and I am not really sure what the previous owner did to the car - this is the case when you BUY that old car. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
"Elle" > wrote in message ...
> "Larry in AZ" > > Elle wrote >>> Folks who know nothing about automotive engine systems >>> should not buy such old cars. >>> >>> Those who know these cars and have the time to work on >>> them >>> stand to save a lot of money. >> >> It's the kind of car you get for your young son, and let >> him fix it up for >> the fun and experience. It's not a serious daily-driver >> for anyone. > > For anyone who has taken their c. 1990 Honda beyond 200k > miles, a second Honda with 120k miles original engine or > 163k miles body and 70k mile engine can result in a daily > driver. I got my 1995 toyota camry when it had 47k miles in 1998. Since then I hapily drive it still today, with 246k miles. No head gasket problems or any other major things to worry. But I KNOW THIS CAR! Every day of its history since May'98. It does not mean I would seek a camry that old from a stranger. No matter how much time you spend inspecting the car at the seller location there will always be something that can surprise you after the purchase and cost you in a long run... Look yourself at your original post - how many cars you have already seen and rejected? How much time and gas you spent driving there to look for them? How long more you are going to look for this crazy-cool'89 civic deal? Is it really worth so much trouble? :-) Maybe is not rational anymore but just emotional? ;-) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
"jim beam" > wrote in message t...
> rubbish. mine's a daily driver. and at 40mpg freeway, you can bet > that's serious too. Freeway 40mpg? I think it is just average for a small car like civic. You should achive it easily with modern models of nissan sentra. I make 32mpg easily on my 4-cyl 2004 accord coupe EX-L. And it is not just freeway for me, its probably mixed 80/20. My 1995 camry does not perform as good anymore @ 246k miles. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
Pszemol wrote:
> "jim beam" > wrote in message > t... >> Pszemol wrote: >>> "jim beam" > wrote in message >>> t... >>>> i've seen up to $3k on craigslist for stock 88-91 civics here in the >>>> bay area. that's if you can find one. the local ricers go nuts for >>>> them. even harder to find now that gas prices are high. >>> >>> >>> If this is true that this car is in demand beween ricing >>> enthusiasts than it will be very hard to compete them >>> for somebody who is looking for an economy car... >> >> the price is being bid up by people wanting gas sippers as well - even >> more demand than usual. but you can still get a sedan for under $1k, >> it's the hatchbacks that are in demand. > > I see... > >>> I can hardly imagine what good could come from >>> buying such an old car anyway. Yes, you could probably >>> find a cheap one but it will not be in good condition! >>> You spend a lot of time looking for it, driving around >>> for inspections spending money and time to find one. >>> Then, when you find one it will not be over... >>> Is your main goal not to have montly payments? You >>> *will* be paying montly (or weekly) payments anyway >>> but to the local parts store instead to the bank and live >>> in constant fear that the car will crap out on you in the >>> middle of the trip spoiling a day and causing you some >>> towing costs.. >> >> eh? "constant fear"??? statistically, a new car has a greater >> probability of failure than one that's in the middle of its life. >> [bathtub curve]. at 176k miles, my civic is in the middle of its >> life. there are certain weakness in this vintage civic, main relay >> being the most notable, but it doesn't cost much to sort that stuff out. > > Main relay, or - bigger problem like head gasket. > I am seeing blown head gasket the major fear of > older civic owners compared to other japaneese cars. in my experience, gasket only fails after the radiator cracks and the motor cooks. the gasket goes about a year later. moral of the story, replace the radiator every 10 years. > >>> Does not seem to be such a bargain to me, >>> but you know, I am very spoiled ;-) >> >> as elle says, if you know these vehicles, you can save a bunch of >> dough. my 2000 civic depreciated at about $1,100 per year that i >> owned it. i couldn't spend that much a year in maintenance on my 89 >> if i wanted to. and the 89 has APpreciated in value since i bought >> it, not DEpreciated. > > But compare the benefits of driving 2000 year model year with 89. > Yes, it is more expensive but it is a better car overall. i strongly disagree. my 89 is a much superior vehicle to the 2000. better handling, better interior, better ergonomics, better power to weight... only thing going for the 2000 is full electronic control of the automatic transmission, but the benefit of that is marginal, especially if the mechanical auto transmission is properly adjusted and has the right fluid. > >> and that's not accounting for the fact that certain models are better >> than others. imo, the 88-91 civic/crx is about the best car honda >> ever produced. i've tested/owned subsequent models of civic and they >> neither handle as well, nor are as comfortable as these first "real >> deal" 4-wheel wishbone civics. so that's why i drive them - they're >> the best. > > I am glad you are so enthusiastic about this little car :-) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
Pszemol wrote:
> "Elle" > wrote in message > ... >> "Larry in AZ" > >> Elle wrote >>>> Folks who know nothing about automotive engine systems >>>> should not buy such old cars. >>>> >>>> Those who know these cars and have the time to work on them >>>> stand to save a lot of money. >>> >>> It's the kind of car you get for your young son, and let him fix it >>> up for >>> the fun and experience. It's not a serious daily-driver for anyone. >> >> For anyone who has taken their c. 1990 Honda beyond 200k miles, a >> second Honda with 120k miles original engine or 163k miles body and >> 70k mile engine can result in a daily driver. > > I got my 1995 toyota camry when it had 47k miles in 1998. > Since then I hapily drive it still today, with 246k miles. > No head gasket problems or any other major things to worry. > But I KNOW THIS CAR! Every day of its history since May'98. > It does not mean I would seek a camry that old from a stranger. > > No matter how much time you spend inspecting the car at the > seller location there will always be something that can > surprise you after the purchase and cost you in a long run... > > Look yourself at your original post - how many cars you > have already seen and rejected? How much time and gas > you spent driving there to look for them? How long more > you are going to look for this crazy-cool'89 civic deal? > > Is it really worth so much trouble? :-) > Maybe is not rational anymore but just emotional? ;-) but that's exactly the situation with your rejection of the older vehicle! it can be completely rational to purchase it if you know what you're doing and the price is right! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
Pszemol wrote:
> "jim beam" > wrote in message > t... >> rubbish. mine's a daily driver. and at 40mpg freeway, you can bet >> that's serious too. > > Freeway 40mpg? I think it is just average for a small car like civic. > You should achive it easily with modern models of nissan sentra. > > I make 32mpg easily on my 4-cyl 2004 accord coupe EX-L. > And it is not just freeway for me, its probably mixed 80/20. > > My 1995 camry does not perform as good anymore @ 246k miles. there's a bunch of things you can do that might help. egr valve, tw sensor, valve lash... - it needs a little love. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
"Pszemol" > wrote
> I got my 1995 toyota camry when it had 47k miles in 1998. > Since then I hapily drive it still today, with 246k miles. > No head gasket problems or any other major things to > worry. > But I KNOW THIS CAR! Agreed, not knowing the history is one of the drawbacks of buying a secondhand (or thirdhand or more) car. Carfax helps a lot. I reject a car with too many owners in too short a time, for example, of which there are many out there, at least on Craigs List where I am. I am seeing consistently that the little c. 1990 Civic hatchbacks feel somewhat too much like a death trap. The DXs and base model hatchbacks do not have power steering, plus the suspension bushings generally seem worn (though I could fix this), so the road feel is generally lousy. Then too they are small and cramped. Great mileage, but I like feeling a little more like I am not the smallest, most vulnerable vehicle on the road. Only one of the circa 1990 Civics I have seen had what I would call very good a/c. It also had a great body and 166k mileage, with only two owners. I made an offer on it, but as JBeam observes, offering more than KBB was not quite enough, and it got snatched at a significantly higher price before I could counter. I was testing the waters. Now I am seeing good, newer c. 1995 Civics sell within two hours on Craigs List. Having driven a few 95-97 Civics now, I am leaning towards spending more and making this second car the one that will replace my 91 Civic in a few years. Meanwhile my friend will use the newer one for commuting in summer, then use my 91 Civic (no a/c) the rest of the year. Like you were saying when comparing cars, the newer ones have a much much better feel. I am not in a rush. Which means I end up saving as much as a few thousand dollars. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
"Pszemol" > wrote in message ... > "jim beam" > wrote in message > t... >> i've seen up to $3k on craigslist for stock 88-91 civics here in >> the bay area. that's if you can find one. the local ricers go >> nuts for them. even harder to find now that gas prices are high. > > > If this is true that this car is in demand beween ricing > enthusiasts than it will be very hard to compete them > for somebody who is looking for an economy car... > > I can hardly imagine what good could come from > buying such an old car anyway. Yes, you could probably > find a cheap one but it will not be in good condition! > You spend a lot of time looking for it, driving around > for inspections spending money and time to find one. > Then, when you find one it will not be over... > Is your main goal not to have montly payments? You > *will* be paying montly (or weekly) payments anyway > but to the local parts store instead to the bank and live > in constant fear that the car will crap out on you in the > middle of the trip spoiling a day and causing you some > towing costs.. > > Does not seem to be such a bargain to me, > but you know, I am very spoiled ;-) California cars rarely rust. There are many older vehicles available that are in very good physical condition. If well maintained, they can be fairly trouble free vehicles...... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
Elle wrote:
> "Pszemol" > wrote >> I got my 1995 toyota camry when it had 47k miles in 1998. >> Since then I hapily drive it still today, with 246k miles. >> No head gasket problems or any other major things to >> worry. >> But I KNOW THIS CAR! > > Agreed, not knowing the history is one of the drawbacks of > buying a secondhand (or thirdhand or more) car. Carfax > helps a lot. I reject a car with too many owners in too > short a time, for example, of which there are many out > there, at least on Craigs List where I am. > > I am seeing consistently that the little c. 1990 Civic > hatchbacks feel somewhat too much like a death trap. what an odd statement! they're only 27cm shorter than your 4-door sedan, and they both have an identical wheelbase. the only reason they could feel worse is if something is wrong. > The DXs > and base model hatchbacks do not have power steering, the automatics have power steering. > plus > the suspension bushings generally seem worn that may be a valid point. i forget that i replaced the bushings and the shocks on both my current cars as soon as i got them, so they both drive like new. > (though I could > fix this), so the road feel is generally lousy. Then too > they are small and cramped. how are they different to your sedan? and i can tell you for fact, there is more interior room in my 89 than there in in the subsequent generations. get a tape measure out. > Great mileage, but I like > feeling a little more like I am not the smallest, most > vulnerable vehicle on the road. > > Only one of the circa 1990 Civics I have seen had what I > would call very good a/c. It also had a great body and 166k > mileage, with only two owners. I made an offer on it, but as > JBeam observes, offering more than KBB was not quite enough, > and it got snatched at a significantly higher price before I > could counter. I was testing the waters. Now I am seeing > good, newer c. 1995 Civics sell within two hours on Craigs > List. > > Having driven a few 95-97 Civics now, I am leaning towards > spending more and making this second car the one that will > replace my 91 Civic in a few years. Meanwhile my friend will > use the newer one for commuting in summer, then use my 91 > Civic (no a/c) the rest of the year. > > Like you were saying when comparing cars, the newer ones > have a much much better feel. I am not in a rush. Which > means I end up saving as much as a few thousand dollars. > > |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Carfax, Buying Used, & Craigslist.org
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On Craigslist | Big Al[_2_] | Ford Mustang | 1 | December 31st 07 01:17 AM |
Saw this on Craigslist | Steve Foley | VW air cooled | 0 | May 17th 07 06:37 PM |
buying a used A6.Need carfax | brett | Audi | 3 | March 8th 05 03:43 AM |
carfax | prajju | Driving | 8 | December 11th 04 09:40 PM |
buying a Saturn-like buying a lottery ticket | misterfact | Saturn | 3 | July 2nd 04 10:02 PM |