If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
I am looking for evryone's opinion!
I have a choice of getting a 2008 Dodge Avenger R/T with a sunroof OR a 2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona (with 25000 miles) for the same cost. The Avenger is new, has great gadgets and reasonable performance. But the Daytona is a Hemi-badass! The Charger is "Certified" so it has a decent warranty. Please help me decide! (Oh yea - the Charger is Go ManGo and the Avenger is Black.) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
"ivanogburn" > wrote in message ps.com... >I am looking for evryone's opinion! > I have a choice of getting a 2008 Dodge Avenger R/T with a sunroof OR > a 2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona (with 25000 miles) for the same cost. > The Avenger is new, has great gadgets and reasonable performance. But > the Daytona is a Hemi-badass! > The Charger is "Certified" so it has a decent warranty. > > Please help me decide! > > (Oh yea - the Charger is Go ManGo and the Avenger is Black.) > The avenger will get better gas mileage! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
In article om>,
"ivanogburn" > wrote: > I am looking for evryone's opinion! > I have a choice of getting a 2008 Dodge Avenger R/T with a sunroof OR > a 2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona (with 25000 miles) for the same cost. > The Avenger is new, has great gadgets and reasonable performance. But > the Daytona is a Hemi-badass! > The Charger is "Certified" so it has a decent warranty. > > Please help me decide! > > (Oh yea - the Charger is Go ManGo and the Avenger is Black.) I would take the Avenger with no hesitation, unless I was towing a heavy trailer, then I'd chose the Charger. I wouldn't order AWD for the FWD Avenger, but I would for the RWD Charger if I drove in snow. At Edmonds owners like it: http://www.edmunds.com/new/dodge/index.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
ivanogburn wrote:
> I am looking for evryone's opinion! > I have a choice of getting a 2008 Dodge Avenger R/T with a sunroof OR > a 2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona (with 25000 miles) for the same cost. > The Avenger is new, has great gadgets and reasonable performance. But > the Daytona is a Hemi-badass! > The Charger is "Certified" so it has a decent warranty. > > Please help me decide! > > (Oh yea - the Charger is Go ManGo and the Avenger is Black.) > The Avenger a generic front-drive v6 with some styling thrown at it to make it look like it has some relation to the Charger. The Charger is rear drive. NO question at all- go with the Charger!!! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
Charger is a better built car- if you can handle the gas mileage go for the
Charger. The new Avenger and Sebring is a huge embarrassment for Chrysler IMHO. "Steve" > wrote in message ... > ivanogburn wrote: > >> I am looking for evryone's opinion! >> I have a choice of getting a 2008 Dodge Avenger R/T with a sunroof OR >> a 2006 Dodge Charger R/T Daytona (with 25000 miles) for the same cost. >> The Avenger is new, has great gadgets and reasonable performance. But >> the Daytona is a Hemi-badass! >> The Charger is "Certified" so it has a decent warranty. >> >> Please help me decide! >> >> (Oh yea - the Charger is Go ManGo and the Avenger is Black.) >> > > The Avenger a generic front-drive v6 with some styling thrown at it to > make it look like it has some relation to the Charger. The Charger is rear > drive. > > NO question at all- go with the Charger!!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
In article > ,
"Scott Koprowski" > wrote: > Charger is a better built car- Why? >if you can handle the gas mileage go for the Charger. UGH! The 300 line is a throwback to the 50s. > The new Avenger and Sebring is a huge embarrassment for Chrysler Why? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
On Apr 14, 1:19 am, who > wrote:
> In article > , > "Scott Koprowski" > wrote: > > > Charger is a better built car- > > Why? > > >if you can handle the gas mileage go for the Charger. > > UGH! The 300 line is a throwback to the 50s. > > > The new Avenger and Sebring is a huge embarrassment for Chrysler > > Why? Yes I would like to knoiw why also. >From the casual observer - they both look similar in apearance. Yes the Charger has a larger powerplant and so it can out perform the Avenger on the track.but not by minutes, just seconds. They are close in price and gas milege. And for the non-purist the Avenger certainly has a lot more gadets available than the Charger line. It will be interesting to see how the Chargers, and Avenger hold up once the Challenger is released. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
who wrote:
> In article > , > "Scott Koprowski" > wrote: > > >>Charger is a better built car- > > Why? Because the Avenger/Sebring is a warmed-over JA-chassis FRONT DRIVE car. > >>if you can handle the gas mileage go for the Charger. > > UGH! The 300 line is a throwback to the 50s. Your turn: Why? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
In article >,
Steve > wrote: > who wrote: > > In article > , > > "Scott Koprowski" > wrote: > > > > > >>Charger is a better built car- > > > > Why? > > Because the Avenger/Sebring is a warmed-over JA-chassis FRONT DRIVE car. That makes it better due to further development of the platform. This is just evolution of a platform. The Charger (300 line) is a warmed over Mercedes drive train, plus some undesirable Mercedes components such as the awful cruise control. > > > > > >>if you can handle the gas mileage go for the Charger. > > > > UGH! The 300 line is a throwback to the 50s. > > Your turn: Why? Heavy, large engine, poor visibility, poor for winter use due to RWD and low ground clearance and the final breaker for me is it can't store a full sized spare- based on a Magnum rental. However the 300 does fill a need which isn't mine. It was hot for a while, but not so now. Chrysler dropped their very popular LH line. Chrysler is suffering because they relied too much on large vehicles, now they are trying to recover their mid and lower market with just the Sebring/Avenger and the Caliber lines. Only two lines! My Chrysler dealer saw the light last year and sold his dealership, but kept his Toyota dealership. He was a Chrysler dealer for many years and obviously saw the light. Now a large GM dealership near me is in a final sale, buy the owner who has had it and several others for many years. He has been opening new dealerships for Toyota, Subaru, etc. The consumer is speaking with their pocket book. I'm holding my overdue new car purchase for the NA manufacturers to get their act together, but I can't wait forever. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Charger Daytona vs Avenger R/T
In article >,
who > wrote: > > >>if you can handle the gas mileage go for the Charger. I filled up my '95 Concord last night because the gas price had dropped, to C$1.114 per L, about C$5.02 per CDN gallon or about US$3.71 per US gallon This is an urban price, prices can be much more in our out of city regions. I need a more fuel efficient car! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
July, 2004 pictures: 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona Copper Poly & 1968 Dodge Charger R-T Bright Red in Boss Chrysler's Garage N.jpg 313566 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Car Show Photos | 0 | March 22nd 07 12:32 PM |
Repost - 2004 pictures: 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona Copper Poly & 1968 Dodge Charger R-T Bright Red in Boss Chrysler's Garage N.jpg 313566 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | March 22nd 07 04:34 AM |
Repost - 2002 pictures: 1969 Dodge Charger 500 and Charger Daytona NASCAR Race Cars Red fvl Garage (WPC Museum) F.jpg 213751 bytes | HEMI-Powered @ [email protected] | Auto Photos | 0 | March 19th 07 01:01 PM |
Production numbers for 06 Daytona Charger | John Anderson, PhD | Dodge | 2 | January 31st 06 05:42 PM |
FS: '74 RoadRunner and '77 Charger Daytona (SE Virginia) | Ruppster | Dodge | 0 | April 26th 04 04:07 AM |