A Cars forum. AutoBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AutoBanter forum » Auto makers » Jeep
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

134a Refrigerant



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #751  
Old July 15th 05, 12:30 AM
L.W.(ßill) Hughes III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My God, are you dense!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
>
> One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may be
> reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, and
> state why.

Ads
  #752  
Old July 15th 05, 01:14 AM
Matt Macchiarolo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK, I see your point. What I should have said was "the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier than either individual compound."
> That's what I meant so say.


"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...

"Matt Macchiarolo" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
> . ..
>
>
> 2 is not heavier than 1+1... that's the point.
>
> Never claimed it to be, I asked my question using a "per unit volume"
> frame
> of reference. The correct answer to my question is "not always."


Here's what you wrote:
> Nathan, quick question...if you mix two compounds, the sum of the two
> compounds by definition would be heavier


The mix of the two components would *not* be
heavier than the individual components weights
summed.
__
Steve
..


  #753  
Old July 15th 05, 02:24 AM
Nathan W. Collier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
...
>> TRANSLATION --> "im wrong so ill spin a herring"


> Lame.


TRANSLATION --> "ill do it again"


> Why are we not drowning in Argon?


the concentration isnt enough to cause a problem.

> Because there's only 1% Argon? That's enough to kill us all!


stop making **** up.


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com


  #754  
Old July 15th 05, 02:25 AM
Nathan W. Collier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
.. .
> Freon is not a mixture.


yeah no ****....its what ive told you from the beginning.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com


  #755  
Old July 15th 05, 02:30 AM
Nathan W. Collier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message
. ..
> 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?


no.

> don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> remove refrigerant as well.


lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and a
conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know
nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to know,
anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my industry
where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and
instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then attempt
to dazzle us with bull****. when that fails you continue to try to spin
away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack **** about
refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)


> > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.


> Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...


lol horse****. you did a translation which i find quite flattering that you
would attempt to duplicate me. :-)


> used a brand name after
> complaining of same.


LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never defined
my statement in any way. liar. :-)


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com


  #756  
Old July 15th 05, 07:49 AM
Stephen Cowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> ...


> > Because there's only 1% Argon? That's enough to kill us all!

>=20
> stop making **** up.


Hey, if you can put your head completely in the
sand, I can propose reasonable thought-experiments!

Tell us again how the entire world is wrong!
__
Steve
..

  #757  
Old July 15th 05, 07:51 AM
Stephen Cowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >=20
> > Of course I'm right... Freon is not
> > a mixture.

> Did we forget, Freon is made up of Chlorine, Fluorine, and =

Carbon:
> http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/Star...matno=3D161=20


Mix the three and see what you get... poisonous
goo. Combine them properly, and you get Freon.
__
Steve
..

  #758  
Old July 15th 05, 07:52 AM
Stephen Cowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> .. .
> > Freon is not a mixture.

>=20
> yeah no ****....its what ive told you from the beginning.


You don't understand the difference between
a mixture and a chemical compound.
__
Steve
..

  #759  
Old July 15th 05, 07:54 AM
Stephen Cowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> jeff wrote:
> >=20
> > "The volume change created by mixing is their new density"
> >=20
> > One of your best by far. FWIW, density is mass/volume. A change in
> > volume may reflect a change in density, and a change in density may =

be
> > reflected by a change in volume, but the two are not equivalent. I'm
> > still waiting for you to stop trying to describe what has happened, =

and
> > state why.


> My God, are you dense!=20


Bill's new science... volume =3D density!
That's even better than Pi =3D 3... and
explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
they *are* impressive!
__
Steve
..

  #760  
Old July 15th 05, 08:04 AM
Stephen Cowell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Nathan W. Collier" > wrote in message =
...
> "Stephen Cowell" > wrote in message=20
> . ..
> > 'air conditioning' doesn't have 'refrigeration' as part of it?

>=20
> no.


I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
popular use.

> > don't let the ambient get too low! Probably need to
> > remove refrigerant as well.

>=20
> lol.....this is a classic example of the differences in a liberal and =

a=20
> conservative! you ask me a question about your industry which i know=20
> nothing about. i tell you up front that i do not, nor do i care to =

know,=20
> anything at all about your industry. i ask you a question about my =

industry=20
> where you are so pitifully ignorant that its funny at this point, and=20
> instead of just admitting your limitations you do a google and then =

attempt=20
> to dazzle us with bull****. when that fails you continue to try to =

spin=20
> away from what is painfully obvious.....you know jack **** about=20
> refrigeration and your source knows about as much. :-)


Typical Republicon... avoid the issue, attack the source,
claim cheating when no evidence is shown.

Suppose you tell me why the head pressure control
couldn't be bypassed, as long as a) ambient doesn't
drop and b) refrigerant is removed in order to compensate
for the lost liquid retention in the condenser.
=20
> > > wow......thanks for the sincere flattery.

>=20
> > Nice crawfish move! Indeed you backed away...

>=20
> lol horse****. you did a translation which i find quite flattering =

that you=20
> would attempt to duplicate me.


But you did indeed back away from your
complaining about, then using, a brand name.
It's in the archives... forever.

> > used a brand name after
> > complaining of same.

>=20
> LIAR! i complained about his definition of the brand name. i never =

defined=20
> my statement in any way. liar.


He described Freon as a compound... you said
it was not. That is most certainly mistaken.
You seem unaware that Freon can be both a
brand and a compound... actually, you are
grasping at straws, as you have been the whole
time. The archives contain the entire conversation...
it is *indeed* disingenuous of you to call me a liar
when anyone can go verify for themselves.
__
Steve
..

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Air Conditioning (A/C) Trouble [email protected] Chrysler 5 June 2nd 05 04:24 AM
Maxi-Frig for R12/R134A ? Henry Kolesnik Technology 39 May 26th 05 06:31 AM
Disposal of Refrigerant 12 dichlorodifluoromethane? Wayne Pein Technology 4 April 13th 05 11:26 PM
Climatronic Diagnostic Controls Luís Lourenço Audi 1 November 12th 04 09:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AutoBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.