Beware, speeders! Cameras coming to I-170

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new...A?OpenDocument

On 3/19/2010 12:55 PM, lil abner wrote:
> http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new...A?OpenDocument
>
Coming to Charlack...gee, there's a surprise.

Although given how much time Charlack spends with a car sitting on the
side of 170 having a camera won't increase the amount of time each that
speed is monitored very much.

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner <> wrote:
>http://www.stltoda...

Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
or care about where it even runs.

AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner <> wrote:
>> http://www.stltoda...
>
> Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
> or care about where it even runs.
The subject is cameras and Big Brother intrusion not St Louis or I 170.
You international types in Podunk need to keep up, really.

lil abner wrote:
> AZ Nomad wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner <> wrote:
>>> http://www.stltoda...
>>
>> Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
>> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
>> or care about where it even runs.
> The subject is cameras and Big Brother intrusion not St Louis or I 170.
> You international types in Podunk need to keep up, really.
sorry for being sarcastic and condescending.

On 3/19/2010 3:49 PM, AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner<> wrote:
>> http://www.stltoda...
>
> Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
> or care about where it even runs.

Why a local newsgroup? It fits under road and driving just fine.

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:15:18 -0500, Rich Piehl > wrote:
>On 3/19/2010 3:49 PM, AZ Nomad wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner<> wrote:
>>> http://www.stltoda...
>>
>> Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
>> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
>> or care about where it even runs.

>Why a local newsgroup? It fits under road and driving just fine.
And of no interest to at least 95% of readers.

Local newsgroups are ones like mn.general, etc.

On Mar 19, 6:27*pm, lil abner > wrote:
> lil abner wrote:
> > AZ Nomad wrote:
> >> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner <> wrote:
> >>>http://www.stltoda...
>
> >> Take it to a local newsgroup. *Most people in this international
> >> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
> >> or care about where it even runs.
> > The subject is cameras and Big Brother intrusion not St Louis or I 170.
> > You international types in Podunk need to keep up, really.
>
> sorry for being sarcastic and condescending.

This topic is 100% cool with me. It involves roads and it is also a
topic I'm personally passionately against...and I used to run a major
road website as well.

On Mar 19, 7:15*pm, Rich Piehl
> wrote:
> On 3/19/2010 3:49 PM, AZ Nomad wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner<> *wrote:
> >>http://www.stltoda...
>
> > Take it to a local newsgroup. *Most people in this international
> > newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
> > or care about where it even runs.
>
> Why a local newsgroup? *It fits under road and driving just fine.

Agreed, it's a topic that's completely suitable for this newsgroup. I
wonder if we have another troll on our hands.

On 3/20/2010 12:06 AM, AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:15:18 -0500, Rich > wrote:
>> On 3/19/2010 3:49 PM, AZ Nomad wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:55:28 -0400, lil abner<> wrote:
>>>> http://www.stltoda...
>>>
>>> Take it to a local newsgroup. Most people in this international
>>> newsgroup don't give a flying **** about I-170 or even have a clue
>>> or care about where it even runs.
>
>> Why a local newsgroup? It fits under road and driving just fine.
> And of no interest to at least 95% of readers.
>
> Local newsgroups are ones like mn.general, etc.

I'm not a regular in rad, but I know in MTR much of what is posted,
while only having direct impact of a local nature, is of interest to
others around the country who are roadgeeks and do find what is going on
in other parts of the country on a local basis interesting and informative.