If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
Carl Rogers wrote:
> Hi Viatologists, > > Would you rather learn about animals from a biologist or a "mammal > enthusiast"? In terms of scientific study, a viatologist reports > roads after using the scientific method: > > 1.Defining the question > 2.Gathering information and resources (observe) > 3.Forming hypothesis > 4.Performing experiment and collect data > 5.Analysing data > 6.Interpreting data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting > point for new hypothesis > 7.Publish results > 8. Leaving room for other scientists to repeat findings. > > Viatology reinforces the scientific method, and as such, brings > relevant studies to the roads criss-crossing the Earth. > OK. Assuming that your website, in all of its various forms, is where you publish your results, what are the question defined and hypothesis posed? What was the experimentation done? Where is the data analysis and interpretation? --Andy |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
In article >,
Andrew Tompkins > wrote: > Carl Rogers wrote: > > Hi Viatologists, > > > > Would you rather learn about animals from a biologist or a "mammal > > enthusiast"? In terms of scientific study, a viatologist reports > > roads after using the scientific method: > > > > 1.Defining the question > > 2.Gathering information and resources (observe) > > 3.Forming hypothesis > > 4.Performing experiment and collect data > > 5.Analysing data > > 6.Interpreting data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting > > point for new hypothesis > > 7.Publish results > > 8. Leaving room for other scientists to repeat findings. > > > > Viatology reinforces the scientific method, and as such, brings > > relevant studies to the roads criss-crossing the Earth. > > > > OK. Assuming that your website, in all of its various forms, is where > you publish your results, what are the question defined and hypothesis > posed? What was the experimentation done? Where is the data analysis > and interpretation? The hypothesis is how many times can one idiot SPAM people before they travel great distances and explain the situation to the idiot with a baseball bat. The experimentation is all the SPAM. The result speaks for itself. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III * * * * * 612-720-2854 * * * * * Newave Communications * * * * * * * * * * * * http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
"John A. Weeks III" > wrote > > The hypothesis is how many times can one idiot SPAM people before > they travel great distances and explain the situation to the idiot > with a baseball bat. The experimentation is all the SPAM. The > result speaks for itself. > Who was it said Carl is an Attention Whore? He is deliberately annoying people just so someone will sit up and take notice. He doesn't *really* care if you look at his website: he just wants you to notice him. That begs the question, however, that if he wants you to notice him does that mean his wife ISN'T ? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
Carl Rogers wrote: > Hi Viatologists, SOD OFF |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
> look at his website: he just wants you to notice him. I think she is somebody's shill. For every inane posting she makes, how many hundreds of responses do we have to filter against. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
On Jul 30, 9:11 pm, John Mayson > wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Steve Firth wrote: > > Carl Rogers > wrote: > > >> Hi Viatologists, > > > I've told you before, it's Viagnostics. > > Are "viagnostics" people who don't believe in roads? :-) > > -- > John Mayson > > Austin, Texas, USA I think that would be Viatheists. :-) Bob S |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:11:19 -0500, John Mayson wrote:
>Are "viagnostics" people who don't believe in roads? :-) No, they are people who don't believe in you-know-who. -- To reply by e-mail, remove the "restrictor plate" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
Oh hai! Viatologistz,
wud yoo rather learn abowt prey frum a biologist or a "mammal enthusiast"? In turmz uv scientific study, a viatologist reportz roadz aftah usin teh scientific method: 1.Definin teh kweschun 2.Gatherin informashun adn resourcez (observe) 3.Foarmin hypothesiz 4.Performin experiment adn collect data 5.Analysin data 6.Interpretin data adn draw conclusionz dat serve az a staartin point foar new hypothesiz 7.Publish resultz 8. Leavin territory foar uddah scientistz ta repeat findingz. Viatology reinforcez teh scientific method, adn az such, bringz relevant studiez ta teh roadz criss-crossin teh urf. Cheerz, Carl Rogerz "Environment furst, transportology twoth" ******** wurldwied Transportashun Library (WWTL): http://wwtl.wtf ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Compleet coveraeg uv international roadz adn railwaiz. Since 2000, we haz ofered several photographz, videoz adn virchual 360 capturez -- ta each viatologist & transportologist. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ******** |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
On Jul 30, 6:21*am, "US 71" > wrote:
> "John A. Weeks III" > wrote > > > > > The hypothesis is how many times can one idiot SPAM people before > > they travel great distances and explain the situation to the idiot > > with a baseball bat. *The experimentation is all the SPAM. *The > > result speaks for itself. > > Who was it said Carl is an Attention Whore? He is deliberately annoying people > just so someone will sit up and take notice. *He doesn't *really* care if you > look at his website: he just wants you to notice him. > > That begs the question, however, that if he wants you to notice him does that > mean his wife ISN'T ? Who would be pathetic enough to marry Carl? I'm sure even SPEEDY's mom wouldn't do Carl, no matter what the fee. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Why the term "road enthusiast" isn't relevant
Andrew Tompkins wrote:
> Carl Rogers wrote: >> Hi Viatologists, >> >> Would you rather learn about animals from a biologist or a "mammal >> enthusiast"? In terms of scientific study, a viatologist reports >> roads after using the scientific method: >> >> 1.Defining the question >> 2.Gathering information and resources (observe) >> 3.Forming hypothesis >> 4.Performing experiment and collect data >> 5.Analysing data >> 6.Interpreting data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting >> point for new hypothesis >> 7.Publish results >> 8. Leaving room for other scientists to repeat findings. >> >> Viatology reinforces the scientific method, and as such, brings >> relevant studies to the roads criss-crossing the Earth. >> > > OK. Assuming that your website, in all of its various forms, is where > you publish your results, what are the question defined and hypothesis > posed? What was the experimentation done? Where is the data analysis > and interpretation? > Hello? Carl? Anybody home? The scientific method doesn't work very well without a question and a hypothesis. --Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"My daughter had a right to be on the road that night," Innis said. "He didn't." | [email protected] | Driving | 465 | August 9th 06 07:27 AM |
"My daughter had a right to be on the road that night," Innissaid."He didn't." | Popeye | Driving | 0 | August 5th 06 06:47 AM |
"My daughter had a right to be on the road that night," Innis said. "He didn't." | Popeye | Driving | 0 | July 30th 06 02:08 AM |