French And CERN Build Massive Particle Accelerator (Black HoleGenerator) Unknown Planetary Risk To Create BIG BANG

On 1 May, 00:48, Raoul Duke > wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:42:10 GMT, Halmyre >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> says...
> >> On Apr 30, 4:37 pm, "Doomsday Machine" > wrote:
>
> >> > I want to learn more, where can I go?
>
> >> Go to Hell. *You're an alarmist getting your rocks off (if you have
> >> any) scaring people with piles of total bull****.
>
> >Who's scared?
>
> No kidding, I had a full body laugh going.

Cheesus. A singularity named Mark in motion!!!
No Particle accelerator required.

"Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
>
> "Frank Adam" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>>>
>>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which they
>>> are
>>>calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head on
>>>collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of light. If the
>>>gravity
>>>produced was strong enough and enough of these micro black holes occured
>>>close enough to each other then they could become a black hole proper.
>>>
>>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on itself
>>> in
>>>an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a thing!
>>>
>> Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to keep
>> clean. ;-)
>
> Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
> compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the Higgs
> Boson.
>

Most planets dont have the Human virus.

AC

"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 00:13:45 -0700 (PDT), emuLOAD
> > wrote:
>
>>On 1 Mag, 07:06, "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>> "Frank Adam" > wrote in message
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>>> > > wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>>>
>>> >> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which they
>>> >> are
>>> >>calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head on
>>> >>collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of light. If the
>>> >>gravity
>>> >>produced was strong enough and enough of these micro black holes
>>> >>occured
>>> >>close enough to each other then they could become a black hole proper.
>>>
>>> >> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on itself
>>> >> in
>>> >>an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a thing!
>>>
>>> > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to keep
>>> > clean. ;-)
>>>
>>> Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
>>> compressing
>>> the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the Higgs Boson.-
>>> Nascondi testo tra virgolette -
>>>
>>> - Mostra testo tra virgolette -
>>
>>I'll beleave that the CERN large hardon collider poses relevant risks
>>on humanity when I see it go all wrong with my eyes...
>>
>>so eitherway, never :P
>>
> That was the base of my master plan(rejected by the bloody do gooders)
> when the nukes were a worry to the world's health. I thought, instead
> of cutting back, why not extend the numbers ? Make many millions of
> ICBMs and just cover every acre of the major cities on Earth..
> We in the city would never know there was even a war. And since when
> do we actually care about rural areas ? ;-)
>
> ps: why is this xposted to drugs.cannabis ? Is that a required
> substance for this advanced level discussion ?

Its certainly helping me. Is just so beautiful man. One huge yummy doughnut,
mmmmmmmmm.yum, yum.

AC

AC wrote:

>
> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
> >
> >"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
> ...
> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
> > wrote:
> > >
> >>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
> > > >
> >>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which
> they are
> > > > calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head
> > > > on collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of
> > > > light. If the gravity produced was strong enough and enough of
> > > > these micro black holes occured close enough to each other then
> > > > they could become a black hole proper.
> > > >
> >>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on
> itself in
> > > > an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a
> > > > thing!
> > > >
> > > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to
> > > keep clean. ;-)
> >
> > Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
> > compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the
> > Higgs Boson.
> >
>
> Most planets dont have the Human virus.
>
> AC

How do you know?

The outcome of an infinite Universe containing an infinite number of
stars with planets then by definition there must be an infinite number
of planets which have the human virus...

.... my head hurts ;-)

--
Paul-B

On 1 May 2008 09:41:02 GMT, "Paul-B" > wrote:

>AC wrote:
>
>>
>> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>> news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
>> >
>> >"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> >>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>> > > >
>> >>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which
>> they are
>> > > > calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head
>> > > > on collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of
>> > > > light. If the gravity produced was strong enough and enough of
>> > > > these micro black holes occured close enough to each other then
>> > > > they could become a black hole proper.
>> > > >
>> >>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on
>> itself in
>> > > > an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a
>> > > > thing!
>> > > >
>> > > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to
>> > > keep clean. ;-)
>> >
>> > Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
>> > compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the
>> > Higgs Boson.
>> >
>>
>> Most planets dont have the Human virus.
>>
>> AC
>
>How do you know?
>
>The outcome of an infinite Universe containing an infinite number of
>stars with planets then by definition there must be an infinite number
>of planets which have the human virus...
>
Unless we're just a simulation of course.
The possibility of us, as a simulation, being just a subsimulation of
one of an infinite number of simulations, themselves running as subs
in their respective infinite numbers of parent simulations
notwithstanding, it is still only a simulation, and thus not real and
so nothing to for us to worry about..

>... my head hurts ;-)
>
Hope this helped.

--

Regards, Frank

(Paul-B) wrote:

> by definition there must be an infinite number
> of planets which have the human virus...

I think there will have been many similar species across the universe.
However as life is inherently unlikely and unstable (ie ultimately
self-destructive), I think the chances of any two planets anywhere
containing life at the same time are close enough to zero to make no
difference.

The infinity thing is fascinating though. There are an infinite number of
numbers. There are also an infinite number of just even numbers (or odd
numbers). It therefore stands to reason that an infinite number of
numbers ought to contain twice as many numbers as an infinite number of
even numbers.

There are also an infinite number of numbers between each number.
Therefore an infinite number of numbers must contain (infinity)^2
numbers.

Which all goes to prove that infinity is hard to fit into a box. Even a
very big one. It's far simpler to just lie on your back on a clear night,
holding onto the planet firmly just in case you fall off while
contemplating the triviality of your lowly existence.

Andrew McP

"Paul-B" > wrote in message
...
> AC wrote:
>
>>
>> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>> news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
>> >
>> >"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> >>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>> > > >
>> >>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which
>> they are
>> > > > calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head
>> > > > on collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of
>> > > > light. If the gravity produced was strong enough and enough of
>> > > > these micro black holes occured close enough to each other then
>> > > > they could become a black hole proper.
>> > > >
>> >>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on
>> itself in
>> > > > an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a
>> > > > thing!
>> > > >
>> > > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to
>> > > keep clean. ;-)
>> >
>> > Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
>> > compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the
>> > Higgs Boson.
>> >
>>
>> Most planets dont have the Human virus.
>>
>> AC
>
> How do you know?
>
> The outcome of an infinite Universe containing an infinite number of
> stars with planets then by definition there must be an infinite number
> of planets which have the human virus...
>
> ... my head hurts ;-)
>
> --
> Paul-B

Allow me to split a hair....

Would intelligent life (assuming we believe that is what we have on Earth)
on another planet be human? Would nature repeat the same mistake? Although,
that could be a super duper from of evolution. In that only life that learns
to protect it's planet survives. If so, I wonder how we are doing? Hmmmmm

AC

"Paul-B" > wrote in message
...
> AC wrote:
>
>>
>> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>> news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
>> >
>> >"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> >>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>> > > >
>> >>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which
>> they are
>> > > > calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head
>> > > > on collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of
>> > > > light. If the gravity produced was strong enough and enough of
>> > > > these micro black holes occured close enough to each other then
>> > > > they could become a black hole proper.
>> > > >
>> >>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on
>> itself in
>> > > > an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a
>> > > > thing!
>> > > >
>> > > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to
>> > > keep clean. ;-)
>> >
>> > Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
>> > compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the
>> > Higgs Boson.
>> >
>>
>> Most planets dont have the Human virus.
>>
>> AC
>
> How do you know?
>
> The outcome of an infinite Universe containing an infinite number of
> stars with planets then by definition there must be an infinite number
> of planets which have the human virus...
>
> ... my head hurts ;-)

No there are only a finite number of living creatures in an infinite space,
as any finite number divided by infinity is so close to 0 the chances of ever
meeting another living creature are so slim as to be irrelevant.

(Probably a far more recognisable reference than the last one).

"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
...
> On 1 May 2008 09:41:02 GMT, "Paul-B" > wrote:
>
>>AC wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Depresion" <127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>> news:E6qdnZwDH-II8YTVnZ2dnUVZ8u-dnZ2d@plusnet...
>>> >
>>> >"Frank Adam" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > > On Thu, 1 May 2008 10:01:56 +1000, "Byron Forbes"
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> >>> Awe come on - that was good stuff!
>>> > > >
>>> >>> The basic point is this - you will get super densities (which
>>> they are
>>> > > > calling micro black holes) produced by making protons have head
>>> > > > on collisions with a relative speed of twice the speed of
>>> > > > light. If the gravity produced was strong enough and enough of
>>> > > > these micro black holes occured close enough to each other then
>>> > > > they could become a black hole proper.
>>> > > >
>>> >>> So what you say? Well then the entire planet collapses in on
>>> itself in
>>> > > > an instant. Don't worry - you won't see it coming or feel a
>>> > > > thing!
>>> > > >
>>> > > Crap, the Greens will be ****ed. Black is almost impossible to
>>> > > keep clean. ;-)
>>> >
>>> > Most planets of our class destroy them selves not by war but by
>>> > compressing the entire planet to the size of a pea looking for the
>>> > Higgs Boson.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Most planets dont have the Human virus.
>>>
>>> AC
>>
>>How do you know?
>>
>>The outcome of an infinite Universe containing an infinite number of
>>stars with planets then by definition there must be an infinite number
>>of planets which have the human virus...
>>
> Unless we're just a simulation of course.
> The possibility of us, as a simulation, being just a subsimulation of
> one of an infinite number of simulations, themselves running as subs
> in their respective infinite numbers of parent simulations
> notwithstanding, it is still only a simulation, and thus not real and
> so nothing to for us to worry about..
>
>>... my head hurts ;-)
>>
> Hope this helped.
>
> --
>
> Regards, Frank

Yeah, but shift - R is cheating and every lap completed after a shift-R
is increasingly meaningless as will our lives be if we allow this micro
black hole to suck us all in like a huge whore!

"Andrew MacPherson" > wrote in message
ddress_disguised...
> (Paul-B) wrote:
>
>> by definition there must be an infinite number
>> of planets which have the human virus...
>
> I think there will have been many similar species across the universe.
> However as life is inherently unlikely and unstable (ie ultimately
> self-destructive), I think the chances of any two planets anywhere
> containing life at the same time are close enough to zero to make no
> difference.
>
> The infinity thing is fascinating though. There are an infinite number of
> numbers. There are also an infinite number of just even numbers (or odd
> numbers). It therefore stands to reason that an infinite number of
> numbers ought to contain twice as many numbers as an infinite number of
> even numbers.
>
> There are also an infinite number of numbers between each number.
> Therefore an infinite number of numbers must contain (infinity)^2
> numbers.
>
> Which all goes to prove that infinity is hard to fit into a box. Even a
> very big one. It's far simpler to just lie on your back on a clear night,
> holding onto the planet firmly just in case you fall off while
> contemplating the triviality of your lowly existence.
>
> Andrew McP

Yeah, this entire thing is one of those "in between 6" or even "in the
middle of 6" type of things. ie pretty freaky stuff.

What does this mean?

Well, this is the part of the number line between the numbers 5.9
(repeater) and 6.0 (repeater) with a 1 on the end.

Just thought I'd throw that in.