American Car Makes

"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
:

>
> "Dave Lister" > wrote in message
> . 6...
>> "Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>>
>>> "Dave Lister" > wrote in message
>>> . 6...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why were the dollars and resources spent to gas the Jews while the
>>>> army was
>>>> floundering?
>>>>
>>> So your whole argument seems to be shouting " Nazi!"
>>> at anyone who dares to diagree?
>>>
>>> Whoo-hoo you sure are a good debater.
>>>
>>> maybe even the Master
>>>
>>>
>>> Yup, you are a master-debater for sure.
>>
>> Learn to read, pinhead.
>>
> What did I miss?

You missed the neo-Nazi refer to "subhumans", pinhead.

> You post crap, someone posts a
> reply that disagrees, you resort to name calling, using "nazi"
> and "moron". Not exactly the most compelling arguments I have
> seen. I assume that you have very limited experience with
> the free exchange of ideas, like a ten year old.

Don't project your inadequecies on others, pinhead. If you can't stand
the heat....

--
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick

Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time

"Dave Lister" > wrote in message
. 6...
> "Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
> :
>

>> You post crap, someone posts a
>> reply that disagrees, you resort to name calling, using "nazi"
>> and "moron". Not exactly the most compelling arguments I have
>> seen. I assume that you have very limited experience with
>> the free exchange of ideas, like a ten year old.
>
> Don't project your inadequecies on others, pinhead. If you can't stand
> the heat....
>
Well, this is fun, but I have to get up and go
to my "job" like your mammy and daddy do. So
I leave you to it tonight.

"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
news
>
> "Dave Lister" > wrote in message
> . 6...
>> "Bernard Farquart" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>
>>> You post crap, someone posts a
>>> reply that disagrees, you resort to name calling, using "nazi"
>>> and "moron". Not exactly the most compelling arguments I have
>>> seen. I assume that you have very limited experience with
>>> the free exchange of ideas, like a ten year old.
>>
>> Don't project your inadequecies on others, pinhead. If you can't stand
>> the heat....
>>
> Well, this is fun, but I have to get up and go
> to my "job" like your mammy and daddy do. So
> I leave you to it tonight.

Some of us are bright enough to have jobs in the daytime, pinhead, that
don't involve a trash truck like yours does.

--
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick

Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time

In article > ,
Dave Lister > wrote:
(Matthew Russotto) wrote in
:
>
>> In article > ,
>> Dave Lister > wrote:
>>>
>>>Yawn. Is that the best you can do loon, "the commies are coming!"?
>>>
>>>What part of "imprisonment without trial" is eluding your large ego and
>>>tiny mind?
>>
>> Imprisonment without trial is customary practice in war. In fact,
>> trials of prisoners of war are typically (but not always) against
>> various international conventions.
>>
>> The Bush administration is doing plenty wrong w.r.t the Guantanemo
>> prisoners, but holding them without trial isn't precisely one of them.
>
>We aren't at war with them, or did that elude you?

They were, or at least a large number of them were, captured on the
battlefield in Afghanistan.

>If they aren't POWs,
>which is what Bush claims, then they should get a trial or get let go.

A trial for what?
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.

(Matthew Russotto) wrote in
:

> In article > ,
> Dave Lister > wrote:
(Matthew Russotto) wrote in
:
>>
>>> In article > ,
>>> Dave Lister > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Yawn. Is that the best you can do loon, "the commies are coming!"?
>>>>
>>>>What part of "imprisonment without trial" is eluding your large ego
>>>>and tiny mind?
>>>
>>> Imprisonment without trial is customary practice in war. In fact,
>>> trials of prisoners of war are typically (but not always) against
>>> various international conventions.
>>>
>>> The Bush administration is doing plenty wrong w.r.t the Guantanemo
>>> prisoners, but holding them without trial isn't precisely one of
>>> them.
>>
>>We aren't at war with them, or did that elude you?
>
> They were, or at least a large number of them were, captured on the
> battlefield in Afghanistan.

Some were, most weren't.

>>If they aren't POWs,
>>which is what Bush claims, then they should get a trial or get let go.
>
> A trial for what?

For whatever they are in prisoned for.

--
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick

Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Billzz wrote:

> >> > Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time

> >> I have a question. Why spend the dollars and human resources
> >> detaining these people if there wasn't good reason to? There would
> >> be no point at all in doing so, would there?

> > James, that is an *excellent* impression you do of Dick "We promise we
> > only keep bad guys there" Cheney.

> What does all this have to do with American Car Makes?

Stop clouding the issue!

DTJ wrote:

> >When the odometer hits 210, 000 somewhere on the return trip, can I
> >officially promote it from "mediocre" to "marvelously mediocre"? It
> >gets me wherever I want to go at about as little integrated cost of
> >ownership as one could hope for, and that aspect of performance has a
> >charm all its own.
>
> Nah, the correct term would be "superior to everything that GM, Ford
> and Chrysler will turn out this year or next." Further, that is
> assuming you are comparing your '89 to those new vehicles. A
> comparison of a new Honda or Toyota to the crap "American" companies
> claim is their best would be a joke.

To each his own. I have owned a Toyota, my Sister owns a
Honda. The Toyota was the biggest POS I have ever owned. My
sisters Honda is a good car, but nothing I'd want (too
small, too slow, cheap looking interior, paint failing after
8 years). Compared to the worst US car I have ever owned
(1981 Plymouth Reliant), the Toyota I owned was a POS (1983
Cressida). And my Sister's Honda (1997 Civic) although far
more reliable, is from a driving standpoint not as good as
the Reliant (and not even close to the closest in size Ford
I ever owned, a 1978 Fiesta). There is not one Japanese
sedan that interests me. The Toyota sedans are dull and
technologically second rate (Prius excepted). I am
interested in a Toyota or Nissan Truck. Not because they are
more reliable (nothing could be more reliable than my 13
year old F150), but because they are a better size (smaller,
but not too small) and less glitzy than US trucks. The
current F150, Silverado, Titans, and Rams are cartoon
vehicles as far as I am concerned. Too big, too fancy for a
work truck, and stupid as a commuter vehicle. If I wanted a
big truck, an F250 is OK, but I don't need that. Rangers are
too small, and Colorados don't entice me. No way I'd buy a
Dakota. That leaves Tundras, Tacomas, and Frontiers. I think
maybe the newer Tacomas are the best combination of size,
performance, and reliability. However, they are
over-priced......I can actually buy an F150 for less than a
Tacoma......Oh well, I don't want the F150.

Ed

Dave Lister wrote:
>
> 223rem > wrote in newsxVre.3555$on5.1600
> @newssvr19.news.prodigy.com:
>
> > Many US jails are far worse than Gitmo. Why dont you
> > direct your hysterical indignation to them?
>
> The people in US jails have been tried and convicted of a crime, loon.


Not all of them. Lots of people are in jail awaiting
trial....

Ed

"C. E. White" > wrote in news:42B1B345.90917013
@nospam.com:

>
>
> Dave Lister wrote:
>>
>> 223rem > wrote in newsxVre.3555$on5.1600
>> @newssvr19.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>> > Many US jails are far worse than Gitmo. Why dont you
>> > direct your hysterical indignation to them?
>>
>> The people in US jails have been tried and convicted of a crime, loon.
>
>
> Not all of them. Lots of people are in jail awaiting
> trial....

Not for three fricken years, and not without due process in progress.

--
Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick

Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time

"Dave Lister" > wrote in message
. 6...
> "Dan J.S." > wrote in
> :
>
>> I do know what it is, because I lived in Eastern Europe and it has
>> happened to my dad. What is happening here is not what you liberals
>> imply. As a matter of fact, by implying that Bush is a Hitler, and
>> Guantanamo is Gulag you are seriously minimizing the evils conducted
>> by both Hitler and the Russians. Then again, you are a liberal, so you
>> are probably not educated.
>
> No wonder you gloss over it, reactionary. Your argument seems to be "it
> isn't as bad as what the Russians did so its ok".
>
> Who implied Bush is a Hitler?
>
> Your education seems to have been non-existant.
>
> --
> Republican Health Plan: Don't Get Sick
>
> Guantanamo: The Gulag of Our Time
>

There are hundreds if not thousands of political prisoners on Cuba, being
abused every day, yet you look at Guantanamo as the source of evil.

BTW - If you are going to cut on my level of education, please learn to
spell EXISTENT.