If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The AX-5 transmission failures that I have heard about seem to involve over
use of fifth gear. Even with the stock 4.11 axle ratio found with the 2.5 liter engine, fifth gear is all but useless except in a tail wind situation. Imho, the best engine for this vehicle is another 2.5 liter engine. The transfer case and differential are the same as are used with the six cylinder engine, except for two differences. The transfer case input shaft/gear would have to be swapped with a longer part to use it with the AX-15 engine. This involves disassembly of the transfer case. The differentials sport 4.11 gears (actually 4.10 front) which is close to the optimal ratio for most applications. Although the D35C rear axle is not exactly "wimpy" many prefer the heavier D44 or a Ford 9-inch axle from an Explorer. Bill has some pics of D35C axle C-clip failures that you might want to look at. This vehicle with a six cylinder engine would be a decent rig, but I am not sure it would be worth the effort required, unless you find that wrecked vehicle you were talking about. For an off road vehicle, or even one used in a rural setting, the main thing you are looking for in an engine swap is reliability. The 2.5 liter will sip fuel on the trail and idle all day without overheating. Earle "William G." > wrote in message ... > Hey thanks. I read that the 4 cyl transmission was crap anyway, not really > strong enough for the 4 cyl! So now the transplant is getting a bit more > extensive but not too bad yet. How about the transfer case and > differentials? Did they put wimpy ones behind the 2.5L? Would they have to > be replaced? Should he just buy a different rig? Don't mind doing the work > but maybe starting with the 2.5L rig is not a good spot to start? > > |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Novak doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and further
appear proud of it. Their product line is mostly "Mickey Mouse Plates"-adapters to adapt the engine's bellhousing to the target transmission. Building a new bellhousing, while more expensive, is the right way. They also offer some dubious transmission advice. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Are you aware the stock Jeep used an adapter between the Buick V6
and V8 bellhousings and their Borg Warner T-89, T-90, T-14 and T-15 transmission? Yes, Novak will make an adapter for the AX-15, and Advanced will not. My first Jeep adapter bought from Advanced was for a Muncie M-22 to a Dana 20, in '69. First engines into a CJ-5 were the Buick 350: http://www.billhughes.com/buickV8jeep.jpg and Olds 455, and of course the 350, and 400" small block Chevys: http://www.billhughes.com/JeepNOhood.jpg What were your first? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O wrote: > > Novak doesn't know their ass from a hole in the ground, and further > appear proud of it. Their product line is mostly "Mickey Mouse > Plates"-adapters to adapt the engine's bellhousing to the target > transmission. Building a new bellhousing, while more expensive, is the > right way. They also offer some dubious transmission advice. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned three Jeeps and sorry, have seen fit to keep the 258 in
all three. WOULD I do a swap? Yeah, someday-but it would have to be free of those pesky ceramic things you thread in the head. Probably an Axis-built (Jap, Italian or German...) stinky smoky diesel. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
I have owned three Jeeps and sorry, have seen fit to keep the 258 in
all three. WOULD I do a swap? Yeah, someday-but it would have to be free of those pesky ceramic things you thread in the head. Probably an Axis-built (Jap, Italian or German...) stinky smoky diesel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 4/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 0 | April 22nd 05 05:32 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 4 | February 2nd 05 05:22 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 7 | February 1st 05 01:43 PM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | December 2nd 04 05:19 AM |
rec.autos.makers.chrysler FAQ, Part 1/6 | Dr. David Zatz | Chrysler | 10 | October 16th 04 05:28 AM |