If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
> > **** safety, Drive right and you won't need it. Safety is just a > protection scheme invented by the American car companies to keep out the > competition. They WILL NOT make fuel efficient vehicles. Hybrids should > get over 100mpg by rights. Americans don't make a single car that gets > 50mpg. Europe makes several, every car company makes 2 or 3 that get 50 > to 80mpg. Diesel hybrids get 120 to 150mpg. The US will avoid these. > Give me a choice, my motorcycle don't have air bags, seat belts or crash > test and works just fine. I want a car WITHOUT seat belts and air bags. > I want to choose my safety devices, I don't want you to. We don't need > forced communist compliance at all. You can "drive right" as much as you like, but it won't necessarily save you from the dope who isn't. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Broderick Crawford wrote: > Michael Pardee wrote: > >>"Broderick Crawford" > wrote in message .. . >> >>>Useful Info wrote: >>> >>>>Read all about it, he http://Muvy.org >>>> >>> >>>Don't worry, the US will ban it. They do not want to sell less oil. >>> >>> >> >>What on earth makes you think that? Zero consumption vehicles, like >>bicycles, are popular and encouraged in the US. I have owned several myself >>over nearly half a century and have never encountered a "not enough oil" >>goon squad. >> >>The consumption would not be an issue, but crash-worthiness and emissions >>are showstoppers. ZEV and P-ZEV vehicles are in great demand by regulators, >>especially in California, but AFAIK diesels are still not available in >>passenger cars there because of the emissions. The safety info in the >>referenced article is not encouraging either; side impact standards >>(mandatory in the US) appear to be lacking: "as safe as a GT sports car >>registered for racing". That's damning with faint praise; if they could say >>it met US safety standards they certainly would have said so. Fuel economy >>really doesn't matter to grieving families. >> >>Mike >> >> >> > > **** safety, Drive right and you won't need it. Safety is just a > protection scheme invented by the American car companies to keep out the > competition. They WILL NOT make fuel efficient vehicles. Hybrids should > get over 100mpg by rights. Americans don't make a single car that gets > 50mpg. Europe makes several, every car company makes 2 or 3 that get 50 > to 80mpg. Diesel hybrids get 120 to 150mpg. The US will avoid these. > Give me a choice, my motorcycle don't have air bags, seat belts or crash > test and works just fine. I want a car WITHOUT seat belts and air bags. > I want to choose my safety devices, I don't want you to. We don't need > forced communist compliance at all. I tend to agree as all the regulation that currently exists has totally got out of hand. Life has risks. It's that simple. When one looks at the weight of today's cars, one common fact comes out; Weight gain is due mostly to safety considerations. My old '83 Honda Civic FE gets over 40 mpg in mixed driving, has functioning brakes, seat belts, horn, wipers and lights. That's all the "safety" related equipment that's really needed. The BIG problem is the NUT behind the wheel. Hard to fix that... JT |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote: > In article >, > Broderick Crawford > wrote: > > >>Give me a choice, my motorcycle don't have air bags, seat belts or crash >>test and works just fine. I want a car WITHOUT seat belts and air bags. >>I want to choose my safety devices, I don't want you to. > > > hehe Yeah, but when you're sitting there with a broken neck, breathing > and eating through a tube, you'll want the Nanny State to take care of > you at no cost--which means taxpayers like me funding the rest of your > miserable life. > > **** you. > In this case, the need is to get rid of the nanny guv'ment. Sometimes, I wish we could turn the clock back to 1970 with regard to what guv'ment spends money on... JT (Abused Taxpayer) |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Eeyore wrote: > > jim beam wrote: > > >>need another example? firestone vs. frod on the exploder rollover >>fiasco. frod won that one, miraculously. > > > I thought it was Ford's idea to run the tyres with an absurdly low presure? How > can Firestone be liable for a design defect by the car maker ? > > Graham > It was and it just made the problem worse by hastening the failure of tires while not fixing the real culprit, vehicle design. Better ideas from Ford??? Not likely... JT |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
"Eeyore" > wrote in message
... > >> I know of many older vehicles where the manual transmissions have not been >> serviced during the lifetime of the vehicle. Has this been changed for >> modern day manual transmissions? > > I've *never* seen a maintenance requirement for a manual transmission. > Check the seals for leaks, change oil every 10 years. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Tomato -vs- (whatever you Brits use)
"Sir F. A. Rien" > wrote in message ... > No. > > "jp2express" > found these unused words: > >>Isn't that what I said? Or, isn't shifting manually for the driver the >>same >>as an electronic device that shifts a manual transmission? >> >>"Sir F. A. Rien" wrote: >>> Ahhh, but your caveat is "traditional" there are other 'automatic >>> transmissions' that 'shift' manually for the driver. To the operator >>> it's >>> "Automatic!" >>> >>> So things are -=not the same=- and it's you who doesn't have a clue! >>> >> > |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Here is the proper link:
http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/gw/vw1litre.htm "Useful Info" > wrote in message ps.com... > Read all about it, he http://Muvy.org > |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
A/T are more expensive right at the point you purchase the car.
Manual transmissions need some gear oil as well but not as particular as an automatic |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
which european car goes 150 mpg? i can't find it in google and
intrested to know more. is diesel banned in the US or just discouraged due to emissions and taxes? and you can't buy any in the market Europe makes several, every car company makes 2 or 3 that get 50 > to 80mpg. Diesel hybrids get 120 to 150mpg. The US will avoid these. > Give me a choice, my motorcycle don't have air bags, seat belts or crash > test and works just fine. I want a car WITHOUT seat belts and air bags. > I want to choose my safety devices, I don't want you to. We don't need > forced communist compliance at all.- Hide quoted text - |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Volkswagon unveils car that gets 282 miles to the gallon.
Eeyore > wrote in
: > > I've *never* seen a maintenance requirement for a manual transmission. > Fluid must be replaced at regular intervals. This will be specified in the maintenance table for your car. -- Tegger The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2006 Vue. 12 miles per gallon? | [email protected] | Saturn | 8 | February 8th 07 04:26 AM |
Rated miles per gallon is total BS! | TOM KAN PA | Chrysler | 40 | April 23rd 05 04:39 PM |
miles/gallon guage? | William R. Watt | Technology | 31 | January 25th 05 07:03 PM |
Gas miles per gallon | Michael | VW water cooled | 19 | October 13th 04 03:56 AM |