If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Analogies, trains and FIRST-Racing...
My train analogy for FIRST Racing:
Back in 1990 a company made its first passenger train. It was the best passenger train ever made and defined the design of trains for the future. The engineers and designers were heralded as innovators. A competitor surpassed it in 92 as new techniques and better tools were available. Undaunted our heroes redefined the genre again in 93 and followed it with their first goods train in 94. The goods train was bigger and heavier than the passenger versions and even though many preferred passenger trains the new technology in the new goods trains made many drivers make the switch and whilst they waited for the new technology to be incorporated in the passenger trains. This duly arrived a year later. Goods trains slowly improved but the real innovation was the new passenger train of 98 which again represented a major leap forward. Again the engineers and designers were viewed as heroes. Having created the greatest passenger train the company concentrated on their goods trains. Other companies launched new passenger trains but despite some successes the 98 passenger train was still regarded as the best by many of the drivers. Whilst the goods trains have a large following many drivers waited patiently for the next passenger train from the best designers. Years passed and it never arrived. The 98 trains were continually updated by their owners such that it looked up to date, but it lacked the technology being incorporated into the goods trains. As more years passed greater modifications were made to the 98 train by the customers to improve the technology rather than just the aesthetics. Furthermore goods trains were being converted to passenger trains in an effort to incorporate the new technology into passenger trains. Remarkably the manufacturers made no updates to passenger trains, leaving the customer base to modify the old trains and convert the goods trains as best they could. Fortunately for the manufacturers the continual improvements made by the customers kept them as a household name, despite their lack of involvement with passenger trains, such that when the company split up the key designers were able to form a new company credible to the passenger train market. The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but are waiting expectantly for the new generation passenger trains to fill the 7 year void. At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Wake me up when its over. The sleeper car looks inviting.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"MrMox" wrote:
> Wake me up when its over. The sleeper car looks inviting. LOL. The sleeper car mod - I could use that in my next epistle. Then again maybe not |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Rickard" > wrote in message
.uk... > My train analogy for FIRST Racing: > > The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but are waiting > expectantly for the new generation passenger trains to fill the 7 year void. > At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. Nothing wrong with what you wrote but you appear to miss the point. Money makes a company work, good PR is a nice thing to have, but it won't put bread on the table for long if people don't keep buying new trains. Why buy a second, new train if you can get a free second train by just modifying the original train? Don't forget a real train can only be changed, if you change it the original train is gone unless you change it back. You still only have one train. Mod a sim & you have the mod, plus the original sim is still there if you are interested in it. For example on my HD I have at least 5 mods for F12K2 plus the original sim but I only paid for one CD. Malc. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Tony
Where's your anorak, thermos & note book for the train numbers Stick to GPL - BTW I'm still being thrashed at Combe by my son. Chris "Tony Rickard" > wrote in message .uk... > My train analogy for FIRST Racing: > > Back in 1990 a company made its first passenger train. It was the best > passenger train ever made and defined the design of trains for the future. > The engineers and designers were heralded as innovators. > > A competitor surpassed it in 92 as new techniques and better tools were > available. Undaunted our heroes redefined the genre again in 93 and followed > it with their first goods train in 94. The goods train was bigger and > heavier than the passenger versions and even though many preferred passenger > trains the new technology in the new goods trains made many drivers make the > switch and whilst they waited for the new technology to be incorporated in > the passenger trains. This duly arrived a year later. Goods trains slowly > improved but the real innovation was the new passenger train of 98 which > again represented a major leap forward. Again the engineers and designers > were viewed as heroes. > > Having created the greatest passenger train the company concentrated on > their goods trains. Other companies launched new passenger trains but > despite some successes the 98 passenger train was still regarded as the best > by many of the drivers. Whilst the goods trains have a large following many > drivers waited patiently for the next passenger train from the best > designers. > > Years passed and it never arrived. The 98 trains were continually updated by > their owners such that it looked up to date, but it lacked the technology > being incorporated into the goods trains. > > As more years passed greater modifications were made to the 98 train by the > customers to improve the technology rather than just the aesthetics. > Furthermore goods trains were being converted to passenger trains in an > effort to incorporate the new technology into passenger trains. Remarkably > the manufacturers made no updates to passenger trains, leaving the customer > base to modify the old trains and convert the goods trains as best they > could. > > Fortunately for the manufacturers the continual improvements made by the > customers kept them as a household name, despite their lack of involvement > with passenger trains, such that when the company split up the key designers > were able to form a new company credible to the passenger train market. > > The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but are waiting > expectantly for the new generation passenger trains to fill the 7 year void. > At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. > > |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Bradley" wrote: > Hey Tony > Where's your anorak, thermos & note book for the train numbers > Stick to GPL - BTW I'm still being thrashed at Combe by my son. > Chris I just wanted to prove how nonsensical the analogies being used were. I think I may have gone overboard this time even by my standards Though in my (admittedly rather weak) defence I may have been indoctrinated by my youngest playing Starlight Express repeatedly... Kaemmer and I should clearly do our talking on the track and leave the analogies to others. BTW, Chris - have you tried the 65 mod yet? Cheers Tony |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
All you intellectual property buffs might wanna head on over to Catwoman:
Copycat, he http://www.bluetights.net/copycat/ These guys are not merely ripping off somebody else's whole shtick, they're bragging about it. Talk abt. hacking the executable.... "Malc" > wrote in message ... > "Tony Rickard" > wrote in message > .uk... > > My train analogy for FIRST Racing: > > > > The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but are > waiting > > expectantly for the new generation passenger trains to fill the 7 year > void. > > At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. > > Nothing wrong with what you wrote but you appear to miss the point. Money > makes a company work, good PR is a nice thing to have, but it won't put > bread on the table for long if people don't keep buying new trains. Why buy > a second, new train if you can get a free second train by just modifying the > original train? > > Don't forget a real train can only be changed, if you change it the original > train is gone unless you change it back. You still only have one train. Mod > a sim & you have the mod, plus the original sim is still there if you are > interested in it. > > For example on my HD I have at least 5 mods for F12K2 plus the original sim > but I only paid for one CD. > > Malc. > > |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Smith" > wrote in
news > These guys are not merely ripping off somebody else's whole shtick, > they're bragging about it. Talk abt. hacking the executable.... > I only remember that Papyrus was ENCOURAGING mod groups when the 1.201 patch was released. THey were almost begging for modders to help stave off EA's juggernaut. Now I know FIRST is NOT PAPYRUS legally, but they are close enough in my mind that it feels like FIRST is going back on Papyrus' promise. dave henrie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Steve Smith" > wrote in message
news > All you intellectual property buffs might wanna head on over to Catwoman: > Copycat, he > > http://www.bluetights.net/copycat/ > > These guys are not merely ripping off somebody else's whole shtick, they're > bragging about it. Talk abt. hacking the executable.... Well I guess congratulations are in order Steve, you managed to find an analogy even worse than Tonys. Malc. > "Malc" > wrote in message > ... > > "Tony Rickard" > wrote in message > > .uk... > > > My train analogy for FIRST Racing: > > > > > > The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but are > > waiting > > > expectantly for the new generation passenger trains to fill the 7 year > > void. > > > At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. > > > > Nothing wrong with what you wrote but you appear to miss the point. Money > > makes a company work, good PR is a nice thing to have, but it won't put > > bread on the table for long if people don't keep buying new trains. Why > buy > > a second, new train if you can get a free second train by just modifying > the > > original train? > > > > Don't forget a real train can only be changed, if you change it the > original > > train is gone unless you change it back. You still only have one train. > Mod > > a sim & you have the mod, plus the original sim is still there if you are > > interested in it. > > > > For example on my HD I have at least 5 mods for F12K2 plus the original > sim > > but I only paid for one CD. > > > > Malc. > > > > > > |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Malc" wrote:
> > The customers continue to modify and convert the old trains but > > are waiting expectantly for the new generation passenger trains > > to fill the 7 year void. > > At which point the old stock will finally head for the sheds. > Nothing wrong with what you wrote Well even I was bored when I got to read it > but you appear to miss the point. Money > makes a company work, good PR is a nice thing to have, but it won't put > bread on the table for long if people don't keep buying new trains. Why > buy a second, new train if you can get a free second train by just > modifying the original train? If there are new and better ones to buy they will be bought. People don't spend money changing cars just because they are getting worn out but because they believe the newer ones are better. The loyalty and good PR bit just comes for free by an interest being maintained in their products by the modders. Probably doesn't make much difference to sales but is still a nice to have in case decent competitive products came on the market. Cheers Tony |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|