If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HEY ENVIRO-LEFTIES; How about a little challenge???
A Canadian firm has released a new catalytic converter for cars
that removes almost all pollutants from auto exhausts. It will take a stream from a regular converter and remove a further 98% of the pollutants. A regular converter costs $300 to the industry. This one costs $1400. Do you think all the Hollywood phonies will be putting these on their cars, to show what good enviro-citizens they are?? Not likely. You know why? Because you can't SEE it, the way you can a Toyota Prius, so there's nothing for the average Hollywoodite to parade around and preen about and boast about what great environmentalists they are. How about getting Kyoto to MANDATE putting it on all cars produced world-wide? Not likely EITHER since the CHINESE and INDIANS (2.3 billion people) don't even have REGULAR (that have been on American cars since 1976) catalytic converters. My car cost about $40,000. If it means spending $2800 (cost of two new converters) to outfit it with a device that renders it less polluting than a cigarette lighter, I'm all for it. PROVIDED it is mandated that ALL cars produced have it from NOW on. The gauntlet is down, phony enviro-leftists, Hollywood trendies and Asiatics; Pick it up, I DARE you! PROVE you aren't just anti-Western CLOWNS, that the Kyoto Accord isn't just a FRAUD designed to shift wealth and jobs east and that you DO care about air pollution. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:44:34 -0400, RichA > wrote:
>A Canadian firm has released a new catalytic converter for cars >that removes almost all pollutants from auto exhausts. It will take >a stream from a regular converter and remove a further 98% of the >pollutants. A regular converter costs $300 to the industry. This one >costs $1400. Do you think all the Hollywood phonies will be putting >these on their cars, to show what good enviro-citizens they are?? >Not likely. You know why? Because you can't SEE it, the way you can >a Toyota Prius, so there's nothing for the average Hollywoodite to >parade around and preen about and boast about what great >environmentalists they are. > >How about getting Kyoto to MANDATE putting it on all cars produced >world-wide? Not likely EITHER since the CHINESE and INDIANS (2.3 >billion people) don't even have REGULAR (that have been on American >cars since 1976) catalytic converters. > >My car cost about $40,000. If it means spending $2800 (cost of two >new converters) to outfit it with a device that renders it less >polluting than a cigarette lighter, I'm all for it. PROVIDED it is >mandated that ALL cars produced have it from NOW on. > >The gauntlet is down, phony enviro-leftists, Hollywood trendies and >Asiatics; Pick it up, I DARE you! PROVE you aren't just anti-Western >CLOWNS, that the Kyoto Accord isn't just a FRAUD designed to shift >wealth and jobs east and that you DO care about air pollution. pssssssssst rich all the converters in the world will make the exhaust clean look at the by product of the converter CO2 whats responable for globel warming who just fell for the converter sales pitch great ya just added to globel warming FOCTARD h u r c a s t |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
RichA wrote:
> A Canadian firm has released a new catalytic converter for cars > that removes almost all pollutants from auto exhausts. It will take > a stream from a regular converter and remove a further 98% of the > pollutants. A regular converter costs $300 to the industry. This one > costs $1400. Do you think all the Hollywood phonies will be putting > these on their cars, to show what good enviro-citizens they are?? > Not likely. You know why? Because you can't SEE it, the way you can > a Toyota Prius, so there's nothing for the average Hollywoodite to > parade around and preen about and boast about what great > environmentalists they are. > > How about getting Kyoto to MANDATE putting it on all cars produced > world-wide? Not likely EITHER since the CHINESE and INDIANS (2.3 > billion people) don't even have REGULAR (that have been on American > cars since 1976) catalytic converters. > > My car cost about $40,000. If it means spending $2800 (cost of two > new converters) to outfit it with a device that renders it less > polluting than a cigarette lighter, I'm all for it. PROVIDED it is > mandated that ALL cars produced have it from NOW on. > > The gauntlet is down, phony enviro-leftists, Hollywood trendies and > Asiatics; Pick it up, I DARE you! PROVE you aren't just anti-Western > CLOWNS, that the Kyoto Accord isn't just a FRAUD designed to shift > wealth and jobs east and that you DO care about air pollution. > You might want to do a little research about what a catalytic converter does and doesn't remove from combustion exhaust. Here's a hint: perfect, clean combustion results in CO2 and H2O. Kyoto, as flawed as it is, is about reducing CO2 emissions. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:55:36 -0400, pawn > wrote:
> >You might want to do a little research about what a catalytic converter >does and doesn't remove from combustion exhaust. Here's a hint: >perfect, clean combustion results in CO2 and H2O. Kyoto, as flawed as >it is, is about reducing CO2 emissions. > That may be, but Kyoto exempts some of the worst polluting nations because they fall into the developing nation category, while industrialized nations, especially the US is expected to cut pollutants enough to cover for the developing nations like China, India, etc. Screw that. Spike 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior Vintage 40 16" rims w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A gForce Radial 225/50ZR16 KDWS skins Ask not for whom the bell tolls, and you'll pay only the station to station rate. Inside every golden harlot beats a heart. A penny saved... is a waste. It's not the principle... it's how much interest you can get. Tis a wise man who knows on which side his broad is bettered. "Damn the icebergs! Full speed ahead! We're gonna break that record on this run!" said the captain of the Titanic He who is flogged by fate, and laughs the louder... is a masochist! If you can keep your head while all about are losing theirs... you're a frigid chick "When the time comes to lay down my life for my country, I do not cower from this responsibility. I welcome it." -JFK Inaugural Speech "Once there existed a bright shining star that was known as Camelot." A time in America when personal accomplishments were found in serving one's nation, not turning one's back on it; when honor was revered, and loyalty to a common goal was a virtue. Like the Phoenix, the Camelot that was America will again rise from the ashes of those who would rewrite it's history, reinterpret it's founding principles, and relish in dividing it's people rather than in uniting them. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Spike wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:55:36 -0400, pawn > wrote: > > >>You might want to do a little research about what a catalytic converter >>does and doesn't remove from combustion exhaust. Here's a hint: >>perfect, clean combustion results in CO2 and H2O. Kyoto, as flawed as >>it is, is about reducing CO2 emissions. >> > > That may be, but Kyoto exempts some of the worst polluting nations > because they fall into the developing nation category, while > industrialized nations, especially the US is expected to cut > pollutants enough to cover for the developing nations like China, > India, etc. Screw that. Just to be clear, I believe Kyoto to be a laughable attempt at international wealth redistribution, which was fraudulently sold to the weak minded and weak kneed, using junk science recklessly endorsed by a "scientific consensus" (not one entity in the entire world verified Mann's "hockey stick" theory) by tree hugging, tie-dye beret wearing socialists, more concerned with black and white ideology than facts, sense or reality. But a catalytic converter, of any type, won't help achieve Kyoto greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. There, now I'm clear. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
pawn wrote:
> > Just to be clear, I believe Kyoto to be a laughable attempt at > international wealth redistribution, which was fraudulently sold to the > weak minded and weak kneed, using junk science recklessly endorsed by a > "scientific consensus" (not one entity in the entire world verified > Mann's "hockey stick" theory) by tree hugging, tie-dye beret wearing > socialists, more concerned with black and white ideology than facts, > sense or reality. But a catalytic converter, of any type, won't help > achieve Kyoto greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. > > There, now I'm clear. Here, here! I'm what some might call an enviro-lefty, but the Kyoto Protocol sucked the hind teat. Any treaty that lets the Chinese, for example, go about their business as usual because they're a "developing country" is absurd. However, I didn't agree with the high-handed way the Bush Administration just walked away from the negotiating table. I think they're in denial about the scientific evidence of the seriousness of the problem, which is overwhelming. -- Cut "to the chase" for my email address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
rw wrote:
> > I think they're in denial > about the scientific evidence of the seriousness of the problem, which > is overwhelming. Please elaborate. Seriousness of what problem? Global warming (which could be man made, but has a much more established natural cyclical trend) is a given, so please be creative, or ar least relevant. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:14:55 -0700, Spike > wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:55:36 -0400, pawn > wrote: > >> >>You might want to do a little research about what a catalytic converter >>does and doesn't remove from combustion exhaust. Here's a hint: >>perfect, clean combustion results in CO2 and H2O. Kyoto, as flawed as >>it is, is about reducing CO2 emissions. >> flawed?/ kyoto was designed to targets smog you FOCTARD >That may be, but Kyoto exempts some of the worst polluting nations >because they fall into the developing nation category, while >industrialized nations, especially the US is expected to cut >pollutants enough to cover for the developing nations like China, >India, etc. Screw that. psssssst spike most of the industries in india are owned by the USA and england typical yankee screw that LMFAO |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:44:34 -0400, RichA > wrote:
Here's a challenge. Stop being a dumbass. >A Canadian firm has released a new catalytic converter for cars >that removes almost all pollutants from auto exhausts. It will take >a stream from a regular converter and remove a further 98% of the >pollutants. A regular converter costs $300 to the industry. This one >costs $1400. Do you think all the Hollywood phonies will be putting >these on their cars, to show what good enviro-citizens they are?? >Not likely. You know why? Because you can't SEE it, the way you can >a Toyota Prius, so there's nothing for the average Hollywoodite to >parade around and preen about and boast about what great >environmentalists they are. > >How about getting Kyoto to MANDATE putting it on all cars produced >world-wide? Not likely EITHER since the CHINESE and INDIANS (2.3 >billion people) don't even have REGULAR (that have been on American >cars since 1976) catalytic converters. > >My car cost about $40,000. If it means spending $2800 (cost of two >new converters) to outfit it with a device that renders it less >polluting than a cigarette lighter, I'm all for it. PROVIDED it is >mandated that ALL cars produced have it from NOW on. > >The gauntlet is down, phony enviro-leftists, Hollywood trendies and >Asiatics; Pick it up, I DARE you! PROVE you aren't just anti-Western >CLOWNS, that the Kyoto Accord isn't just a FRAUD designed to shift >wealth and jobs east and that you DO care about air pollution. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GT4 Rrius Challenge. | [email protected] | Simulators | 0 | April 5th 05 04:56 AM |
Need opinions on F1 Challenge multiplayer | Pickaxe | Simulators | 0 | March 18th 05 02:52 AM |
1st Enviro Teaming up with Green Prix... Developing Formula F3 Game and Need Drivers for 100 Real Events... | Don Wilshe | Simulators | 3 | January 8th 05 04:18 PM |
Most realistic mod for F1 Challenge | Jiyang Chen | Simulators | 0 | January 3rd 05 06:54 PM |
Press Release: Russell Harrison Communication's challenge to the men's lifestyle publication industry | Russ Harrison | Audi | 0 | August 19th 04 02:42 AM |