If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8, 1969 Felony Garage Burglar used teen asaccomplice
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...n&dmode=source
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services, misc.legal, soc.men, alt.support.foster-parents, alt.adoption From: "Kent Wills" > Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:06:14 -0600 KW > Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON KW > (DOB 05/22/1959) KW > CRIMINAL COMPLAINT KW > 04/10/1996 Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST Kent posted a FRAUD that I had an OWI (Drunk Driving). I've only tried to get drunk once in my entire life. Except for that and a few Rum/Pepsi (social drinks) I do not drink alcohol. Of course, I never had any accusation, charge or conviction for OWI. Like your Vodka there comrade Willenski? http://www.public-records-now.com/Se...;; ;;AR;;;;;; WILLS, KENT B Age: 40 Rogers, AR Ankeny, IA Marshalltown, IA Bartlett, IL Villa Park, IL WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad) WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son??) WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom) HARTWIG, TIFFANY JEANNE (Kent's sister AKA Tiffany J Wills) From another source: Kelly M Wills ( Kent's wife ?? ) And another address for Kent: Hanover Park, IL http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/web/...queryHome.html Photo of 202 NW College Kent's folks sold in 1994 and he lived there! http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-...ize.cgi?gp=802... http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-.../homequery.cgi http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/index.html gp=802415452029 (Pay close attention to past owners listed on the record.) Kent made affirmative claims about the property online. Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInf...nderCd=1155768 Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ Iowa Courts Online Search < Start A Case Search Here! > click Iowa Courts Online Search Search Selection Under Trial Court < click on Case Search > Wills Kent B A list of case numbers will be presented. Two on that list have the code "FE" in them. One of the two ends in the two digits "76". Click that case number. A case caption will appear. Tabs available to the public include "Criminal Charges", "Filings" and "Financial". Use the "back" button on your browser to move among them or just hit the various tab buttons. Kent's Appeal http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...4-0202&invol=1 http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInf...nderCd=1155768 Name Kent Bradley Wills Offender Number 1155768 Sex M Birth Date 01/08/1969 Age 40 Location Offense County Of Commitment Commitment Date Duration TDD/SDD * * TDD = Tentative Discharge Date * SDD = Supervision Discharge Date Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008 Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008 Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003 http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/ Iowa Courts Online Search < Start A Case Search Here! > click Iowa Courts Online Search Search Selection Under Trial Court < click on Case Search > Wills Kent B 02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE 05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT 05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT 05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT 05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT 05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969 05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969 http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...4-0202&invol=1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 31 / 04-0202 Filed May 6, 2005 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. KENT BRADLEY WILLS, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge. Defendant appeals claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED. Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee. WIGGINS, Justice. Kent Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary contending that an attached garage is a separate occupied structure from that of the living quarters of the residence. In this appeal, we must determine whether trial counsel was ineffective for (1) failing to move for judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to convict Wills of second-degree burglary when he entered an attached garage of a residence when no persons were present in the garage, but when persons were present in the living quarters; and (2) failing to object to a jury instruction based on this same argument. Because we find there was no legal basis for the motion for judgment of acquittal or the objection to the jury instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I. Background Facts and Proceedings. Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called the local police to report that a car alarm sounded in the resident's neighborhood. The city dispatched a police officer to the location. Observing nothing unusual, the officer left the area, only to be stopped a couple of blocks later by a person who informed the officer he had witnessed someone running from the area of the car alarm. As the officer started driving back to the area of the car alarm, he noticed a person walking on the sidewalk. The officer asked the person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody running from the area. The minor answered that he had not. While the officer and another officer were speaking to the minor, another resident of the neighborhood arrived in her car and informed the officers that she had observed two people, one of whom was heavy set with a blinking light on his back pocket, walking in the area of her neighbor's residence. She observed the heavier-set individual, later identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's attached garage through an unlocked service door. She further observed a smaller individual standing by a van parked in the neighbor's driveway. The officers eventually let the minor leave even though they found a large amount of coins, a flashlight, and an electronic pocket organizer in his pockets. After releasing the minor, the police officers drove to the residence where the neighbor observed the two suspicious people and woke the owner. The owner, his wife, and two daughters were in the residence sleeping at the time. After a search of his vehicles, the owner discovered change and an electronic pocket organizer were missing from the vehicles. The owner's daughter reported a diamond ring and some change were missing from her vehicle. The officers then contacted the minor's parents, who informed the officers the minor was with Wills. After the officers questioned the minor again, he admitted his involvement in the theft and implicated Wills in the burglary. Although Wills denied involvement in the burglary, the officers arrested him. The State filed a trial information charging Wills with second-degree burglary. The State later amended the information to include two additional charges of burglary in the third degree and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. The jury returned a verdict finding Wills guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree, burglary in the third degree, and using a juvenile to commit an indictable offense. Wills appeals his conviction for second-degree burglary claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. II. Scope of Review. Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93 (1984). Our review for a claim involving violations of the Constitution is de novo. State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100 (Iowa 2004). We normally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims for postconviction relief actions. State v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999). However, we will address such claims on direct appeal when the record is sufficient to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer, 609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The appellate record in the present case is sufficient to allow us to address Wills' ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal. In order for a defendant to succeed on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the defendant must prove: (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty and (2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice results when "there is a reasonable probability that, but for the counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378 (Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068, 80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments also raise issues of statutory interpretation, which we review for correction of errors at law. State v. Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004). III. Analysis. To find Wills guilty of burglary in the second degree, the State had to prove Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or upon an occupied structure in which one or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added). In this appeal, Wills first contends his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage, there were persons present in or upon the occupied structure. Wills concedes the garage was an occupied structure, but argues the living quarters and the attached garage are separate and independent occupied structures; therefore, the jury could not have found there were people present in the attached garage at the time of the burglary. The Code defines an "occupied structure" as: [A]ny building, structure, appurtenances to buildings and structures, land, water or air vehicle, or similar place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, or occupied by persons for the purpose of carrying on business or other activity therein, or for the storage or safekeeping of anything of value. Such a structure is an "occupied structure" whether or not a person is actually present. Id. § 702.12. Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590 N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the garage and the living quarters are separate and independent occupied structures. In Smothers, two separate and distinct businesses connected by interior fire doors were operated in the same structure. 590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant committed two burglaries by entering each business because "[t]he facility's construction history and physical make-up demonstrate that the portions are independent working units which constitute '[a] combination of materials to form a construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id. Smothers is not at odds with the present case because the living quarters and the garage are not separate or independent units of the residence. Our review of the record reveals the garage in question was a three-car attached garage separated from the living quarters by a door. The same roof covered the garage as the rest of the residence. The living quarters surrounded the garage on two sides. It was structurally no different from any other room in the residence. The garage was a functional part of the residence. On the night of the incident, the door was unlocked. The owner of the residence used two stalls in the garage to park the family vehicles. The owner used the third stall for his motorcycle. As such, the garage and the living quarters are a single "structure" or "building" functioning as an integral part of the family residence. Thus, the residence including the garage is a single "occupied structure" under section 702.12. See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr. 2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's entry into an attached garage constituted first-degree burglary because the garage was attached to the house; therefore, burglary of the garage was burglary of an inhabited dwelling house); People v. Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an attached garage is a 'dwelling' because it is part of the structure in which the owner or occupant lives"); State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary of the [attached] garage was burglary of the dwelling house because the garage was a part of the structure used as living quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d 760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding "[s]ince the garage in the present case was structurally part of a building which was used for overnight lodging of various persons, it must be considered as part of a dwelling"); White v. State, 630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982) (holding an attached garage under the same roof as the home would be considered a habitation within the purview of the penal code because the garage is a structure appurtenant to and connected to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P. 2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993) (holding the definition of a dwelling under Washington's burglary statute included an attached garage). Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a judgment of acquittal on the basis there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that at the time Wills entered the garage there were no persons present in or upon the occupied structure, it would have been overruled by the court because the owner and his family were present in the residence at the time of the burglary. Wills also claims his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the jury instruction used by the district court on the same ground; that the living quarters were a separate and independent occupied structure from the attached garage. The instruction as given stated: The State must prove all of the following elements of Burglary in the Second Degree as to Count I: 1. On or about the 12th day of August, 2003, the defendant or someone he aided and abetted broke into or entered the residence at . . . . 2. The residence at . . . was an occupied structure as defined in Instruction No. 29. 3. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did not have permission or authority to break into the residence at ... 4. The defendant or the person he aided and abetted did so with the specific intent to commit a theft therein. 5. During the incident persons were present in or upon the occupied structure. If the State has proved all of the elements, the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove any of the elements, the defendant is not guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and you will then consider the charge of Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree explained in Instruction No. 21. (Emphasis added.) Wills' claim is without merit. As we have discussed, the residence is the one and only "occupied structure" under the facts of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel made this objection to the instruction, it would have been overruled. Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not ineffective for failing to move for a judgment of acquittal or objecting to the instruction because there was no legal basis for the motion or objection. See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234, 238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an issue that has no merit). IV. Disposition. We affirm the judgment of the district court because Wills' trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise meritless issues. AFFIRMED. Filings Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FROM PROBATION OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204 PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006 01/26/2006 Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO COMPLETE CONDITIONS LISTED OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS, AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005 06/13/2005 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS 15.9 HOURS = $795.00 ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: BILL OF COSTS $27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL #04-0202 OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL: JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED #04-0202 PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 Comments: AFFIRMED PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO APPEAL #04-0202 COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004 Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04 INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004 05/13/2004 Comments: $1150 ELECTRONIC FILING OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE, 1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04) REC'D 4/20/04 OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004 Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004 Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED APRIL 8, 2004 OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II) SUP CRT 04-202 OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03 VOLUME II DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004 04/05/2004 Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03 VOLUME I OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT REPORTER R.M. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS REQUESTED. MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004 Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY. 3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004 Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED 3/1/04 04-202 OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004 03/18/2004 Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003 DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004 03/03/2004 03/03/2004 Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004 OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004 02/27/2004 Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT 2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202 ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004 Comments: TO WITHDRAW OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING 47 HOURS = $2500 OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: COURT NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004 Comments: FILED BY ATDF OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004 Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS 1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT; 4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM 1 ENVELOPE & VAULT OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004 Comments: VORP VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 Comments: $15.00 PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 ENTERED IN ERROR Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS; COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 Comments: **FORT DES MOINES** RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003 12/26/2003 12/26/2003 Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24 OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04 @ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA TRAINING CENTER. OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5 BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY ON 12-16-03 OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003 Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003 Comments: 4=$0 RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 Comments: 3=$0 ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE 11/13/03 9AM RM 204 ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204 WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 Comments: LIMITED RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 Comments: 1 = $0 OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003 Comments: 6=$0 AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 Comments: 1 - $13.70 OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE AT STATE EXPENSE NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITION NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003 Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR 11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR 11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204 OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003 Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003 Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03 ATDF TAYLOR OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003 Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS .4-$18.00 APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003 Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003 Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1 Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9 Bond is continued TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204 PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03 DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/14/2003 Comments: BOND $13000 C/S APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: APPROVED PD IS APPOINTED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: BURGLARY 2ND ANPD 03-75354 HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03 Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04 Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S Total Bond $13000 C/S Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN- PK1000375 Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK) Citation Number: Orig Paid Due Summary 3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE 125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION 27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER ------------------------------------- $3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00 |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1926 Wills StClair | RonandRachel | Auto Photos | 0 | December 30th 08 06:00 PM |
1921 Wills-Ste Claire V8 Roadster=mx=.jpg (1/1) 23608 bytes | [email protected] | Old Timers Photos | 0 | September 5th 08 07:07 PM |
Driver Gets Felony Conviction For Tossing Cup of Ice Into Car | Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS[_1_] | Driving | 20 | February 21st 07 02:08 AM |
FS 74 1200 Kent GB | M | VW air cooled | 0 | February 6th 06 02:08 PM |
About Kent Finnell (but you knew this already) | Boston Blackie | Honda | 2 | January 4th 05 10:00 AM |