If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
2004 Accord vs 2007 civic
Thanks for all the information guys!!
Is 43k a lot of miles for a 2004 Accord? I have an EX I4 in mind, just was not sure if 43k is a lot for an Accord. On Apr 28, 9:39 pm, Dick > wrote: > True enough, but a Honda Accord is a long way from a Rolls. Try a > 4,000 or 5,000 mile trip in that civic then get back to us on the > enjoyable part. Of course if you are under the age of 40 it probably > wouldn't make any difference anyway. > > > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:16:12 -0500, "Bob Jones" > wrote: > >Hey, some people needs a Rolls Royce to feel comfortable, others feel good > >enough on a bike. I drive 50 miles on a beat up highway every day in a Civic > >and find it enjoyable. You just need a break in period on a new car. > > >"Dick" > wrote in message > .. . > >> We have a 2003 Accord EX. In 2004 we bought a new 2004 Civic LX for > >> our granddaughter (she paid for it.) We drove it home (about 100 > >> miles.) I know the new Civic's are really nice, but I have to say > >> there is really no comparison between an Accord and a Civic unless you > >> are just talking about something to get around town. When you get > >> them out on the road on a long trip, the Civic can't hold a candle to > >> the Accord when comparing ride comfort, performance and noise. > >> Especially in the mountains. > > >> Dick > > >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:17:46 -0500, "Bob Jones" > wrote: > > >>>I just can't tell the difference. After a while they all ride the same. I > >>>would get a new car over a used one any day. > > >> -- > >> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
2004 Accord vs 2007 civic
That's pretty normal. Edmunds.com doesn't add or delete value for
that mileage on a 2004. Our 2003 has 58K and it still seems like new. On 29 Apr 2007 06:14:39 -0700, wrote: >Thanks for all the information guys!! > >Is 43k a lot of miles for a 2004 Accord? I have an EX I4 in mind, just >was not sure if 43k is a lot for an Accord. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
2004 Accord vs 2007 civic
Bob Jones wrote: > I would go for the Civic. It is more fuel economy and nimble. I get less than 25mph around town, fyi. -- Tp, -------- __o ----- -\<. -------- __o --- ( )/ ( ) ---- -\<. -------------------- ( )/ ( ) ----------------------------------------- No Lawsuit Ever Fixed A Moron... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
2004 Accord vs 2007 civic
I've got a 2004 Accord EXv6 with 100k kms - it still feels like a new car -
no problems other than normal maintenance (gotta do the front rotors soon) - running Amsoil synthetic is about the only thing out of the ordinary... > wrote in message oups.com... > Thanks for all the information guys!! > > Is 43k a lot of miles for a 2004 Accord? I have an EX I4 in mind, just > was not sure if 43k is a lot for an Accord. > > On Apr 28, 9:39 pm, Dick > wrote: >> True enough, but a Honda Accord is a long way from a Rolls. Try a >> 4,000 or 5,000 mile trip in that civic then get back to us on the >> enjoyable part. Of course if you are under the age of 40 it probably >> wouldn't make any difference anyway. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
2004 Accord vs 2007 civic
Check the headlights before you buy. The headlights on our 2005 were
pathetic although we were able to improve them with HIR bulbs. Same wattage but 50 to 85% more light. The plastic base of the bulb has to be cut slightly to fit. > wrote in message oups.com... > Thanks for all the information guys!! > > Is 43k a lot of miles for a 2004 Accord? I have an EX I4 in mind, just > was not sure if 43k is a lot for an Accord. > > On Apr 28, 9:39 pm, Dick > wrote: >> True enough, but a Honda Accord is a long way from a Rolls. Try a >> 4,000 or 5,000 mile trip in that civic then get back to us on the >> enjoyable part. Of course if you are under the age of 40 it probably >> wouldn't make any difference anyway. >> >> >> >> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 19:16:12 -0500, "Bob Jones" > wrote: >> >Hey, some people needs a Rolls Royce to feel comfortable, others feel >> >good >> >enough on a bike. I drive 50 miles on a beat up highway every day in a >> >Civic >> >and find it enjoyable. You just need a break in period on a new car. >> >> >"Dick" > wrote in message >> .. . >> >> We have a 2003 Accord EX. In 2004 we bought a new 2004 Civic LX for >> >> our granddaughter (she paid for it.) We drove it home (about 100 >> >> miles.) I know the new Civic's are really nice, but I have to say >> >> there is really no comparison between an Accord and a Civic unless you >> >> are just talking about something to get around town. When you get >> >> them out on the road on a long trip, the Civic can't hold a candle to >> >> the Accord when comparing ride comfort, performance and noise. >> >> Especially in the mountains. >> >> >> Dick >> >> >> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:17:46 -0500, "Bob Jones" > wrote: >> >> >>>I just can't tell the difference. After a while they all ride the >> >>>same. I >> >>>would get a new car over a used one any day. >> >> >> -- >> >> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com >> >> -- >> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com > > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2007 Civic EX Rattle | [email protected][_2_] | Honda | 1 | March 6th 07 12:38 AM |
2007 Civic EX vs. 2004 Accord EX | planetx | Honda | 13 | February 2nd 07 09:00 PM |
'99 Civic vs Accord | SQ | Honda | 4 | May 4th 06 12:13 AM |
Accord EX or Civic EX? | harry | Honda | 0 | February 22nd 06 04:12 AM |
Is my '94 Accord today's Civic? | [email protected] | Honda | 0 | October 16th 05 04:26 PM |